If it is a fine meal consisting of fresh fruits and vegetables, he might tell you, no, the meal evolved.Originally posted by googoomuck:Serve an atheist a fine meal and then ask him if he believes thereÂ’s a cook.![]()
To the idiot here who goes about calling people delusional, he will tell you that there is no cookOriginally posted by googoomuck:Serve an atheist a fine meal and then ask him if he believes thereÂ’s a cook.![]()
There was a kid who accidentally stepped on hell notes, and resulted in a strange problem with the leg not being able to straighten (straightening in causes intense pain), and for one entire year, going to doctors was useless, until the mother had to bring the kid to a medium before the leg was able to straighten. The doctors could not decipher what was the exact problem, and injections or drugs were all uselessTo be frank, wat u said is just a story which is unverifiable and IMO highly exaggerated and probably even fictionious. As someone had said, they step on hell notes and r perfectly healthy as well. Lets just ask u a question. If u r sick, will u see a doctor or a bomoh ?
As again this was never a thing about Science being right or wrong. Its understanding that current Science can only explain a very small amount of things happening in this universe.True. But it answer them correctly and truthfully and to put science as "explain a very small amount" of things happening is un understatement. At least u knwo the computer in front of u is working because of science. It is better than religion when they put in more questions than provide answers.
The best thing is, this person thinks he is right calling others stupid just because Science can prove a person is stupid. As I said, there are rogue scientists who insist on going their way ignoring the consequences, and this person is one such rogue. No ethics, and no respect for other people in this forum.To be frank, in forums u can always see people who r rude to others and showing no respect irrespective of their belief. R u sure u r not confrontational yourself ? And who had belittle ethics in the discussion of evolution ?
Serve an atheist a fine meal and then ask him if he believes thereÂ’s a cookyayaya... show a religious person a TV and he though god is hiding in it
That was not a posting by me, and I merely responded against a specific person.Originally posted by stupidissmart:To be frank, in forums u can always see people who r rude to others and showing no respect irrespective of their belief. R u sure u r not confrontational yourself ? And who had belittle ethics in the discussion of evolution ?
Serve an atheist a fine meal and then ask him if he believes thereÂ’s a cook
If you read the latest astronomical articles, it was said that Science currently can only explain about 2% of everything in the universe. And given the limitations of the human mind (which drives Science), its not an understatement because that's just what we are, small and tiny in the proportion of the universe.Originally posted by stupidissmart:True. But it answer them correctly and truthfully and to put science as "explain a very small amount" of things happening is un understatement. At least u knwo the computer in front of u is working because of science. It is better than religion when they put in more questions than provide answers.
Who are we to be arrogant bums to think that our limited Science is the holy grailWell there r limitations in science, but it is the best we have. U can claim science only provide 2% of the answer but evolution is part of the 2% and it is really a fact.
Its up to youOriginally posted by stupidissmart:To be frank, wat u said is just a story which is unverifiable and IMO highly exaggerated and probably even fictionious. As someone had said, they step on hell notes and r perfectly healthy as well. Lets just ask u a question. If u r sick, will u see a doctor or a bomoh ?
sorry its not my claim. You will have to ask the astronomer that made that claim.Originally posted by stupidissmart:Well there r limitations in science, but it is the best we have. U can claim science only provide 2% of the answer but evolution is part of the 2% and it is really a fact.
I respect people who support Science sensibly, such as Ibram or you, even though I do not know if he applies respect to others who are against his views.Originally posted by stupidissmart:Well there r limitations in science, but it is the best we have. U can claim science only provide 2% of the answer but evolution is part of the 2% and it is really a fact.
Anyway about flame wars, I myself experienced a lot of such things in the past. The best way is just to ignore them and not resort to such measures yourself.
LMAOOriginally posted by Ibram Gaunt:"God made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom."![]()
You have no idea how many times, and how many people had said that to him, but he is just too dense to get it and sooner or later, you too will have to conclude that he is just dense. It is no flaming, it is just stating facts.Originally posted by stupidissmart:Well there r limitations in science, but it is the best we have. U can claim science only provide 2% of the answer but evolution is part of the 2% and it is really a fact.
Anyway about flame wars, I myself experienced a lot of such things in the past. The best way is just to ignore them and not resort to such measures yourself.
That was my first post, page 5 at 19 September 2007 · 09:41 AM and still he doesn't get it!Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:19 September 2007 · 09:41 AMOnly stupid people believe that science is 100% correct and only people that are more stupid believe that there is anything else more believable than scientific discoveries.
Thanks for showing proof of your unethical behaviorOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:That was my first post, page 5 at 19 September 2007 · 09:41 AM and still he doesn't get it!
If that is not stupidity, I don't know what is.
http://sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=274077&page=4
read the posting above. This guy still thinks he is right.Originally posted by soul_rage:Ask that person if he admits to his behavior and he will tell you he does nothing wrong.
Simply put, I accept I make mistakes and its scientific to apologize.
But go and ask that person if he is willing to admit to his mistakes, even when its all in front of him, and you see he will be deluding himself by saying he is not wrong.
Nothing wrong of coz, for a guy who thinks he can be unethical and insult others just because he thinks science has proof.
Don't change the subject. The subject is whether or not you are too stupid to understand what I first said since page 5 and so many people have confirmed it since then and yet at page 18, after 13 x 25 posts = 325 postsOriginally posted by soul_rage:Thanks for showing proof of your unethical behavior
Why don't you remember further what you said
If Science can prove he is stupid, nothing wrong with calling him stupid
Ethics? You don't have.
If you still cannot fathom your obnoxious and rude behavior, continue to persist your ways. I suppose you don't believe either in karma.
and you need to be reminded:Originally posted by soul_rage:If you read the latest astronomical articles, it was said that Science currently can only explain about 2% of everything in the universe.
That is not stupidity then what is?Originally posted by stupidissmart:Well there r limitations in science, but it is the best we have. U can claim science only provide 2% of the answer but evolution is part of the 2% and it is really a fact.
Anyway about flame wars, I myself experienced a lot of such things in the past. The best way is just to ignore them and not resort to such measures yourself.
It's fine, go on and continue repeating and insist you are right.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:That is not stupidity then what is?
You want me to pull out all the other stupid things you said in this thread?![]()
If you are stupid and it has been proven, then it is not an insult, and my behavior is not obnoxious. I am just stating facts.Originally posted by soul_rage:It's fine, go on and continue repeating and insist you are right.
While you pull out the stupid things I said, do go ahead and find those rude statements that you made as well, which you have conveniently forget.
You just continue to re-emphasize the fact that you are rude and obnoxious, refusing to admit your mistakes.
You are not fit to talk about Science, because you insult Science with your behavior.