Will Israel be peaceful in 2008?
-
The Malays could have built up Malaysia into a first world countryOriginally posted by Spartans:Protonhybrid is spewing nonsense yet again. From most of your posts, we can you that you are nothing but a moronic bigot. Alway criticising Singaporeans especially the Chinese. Guess you are just a Malayisa Malay loser.
No fear, Singapore will never allow a flawed Bumpi policy like those in Malaysia. And Malaysia was also colonized by British.
Together with the help of the Chinese and Malays
But by creating the Bumiputra policy
They left out the Chinese and Indians
Causing many of them to leave the country, still are
They could have contributed to the country in many ways
Also, the politicians essentially made the average Malaysian Malay lazier
"I'm sure the government would provide this and that for me, no need to work hard one"
This would be on any Malaysian Malay's mind
Now, removing the policy would be the last thing on any
Malay's mind -
You are already blatantly and mindlessly criticising Singaporeans Chinese in many of your previous posts. Stop acting like an innocent when you are not.Originally posted by protonhybrid:hmm does it mean i can speak my mind on chinese in singapore, or christianity's fanatic streak? like wiping out 4 f*I*** continents of inhabitants of any sort of religion, also half of africa has been duped into duplicitious acts of christianity, also what about korea now becoming a strong christian stronghold. fanaticism growing? usa and korea?
You are unhappy that mass majority of Singapore is Chinese whereas 'native Malays' is of lesser percentage. You believe that the local natives should be given prority in all things(like Malaysia's Bumpi Policy)... what a flawed argument. Look at the Malaysia's Malays. Most are nothing, always waiting for the Government aid. If the Malaysian Chinese or Indians comment on the Bumpi Policy, they waved their Kris around (implying Bloodshed).
On the other hand, all Singaporeans are treated equally, regardless of races. 'We worked together, side by side to develop our small sunshine island to a developed nation.
Singaporeans Malays are so much better than their Malaysian counterparts'. This is wat my Malay lab technician told me. -
What so funny?Originally posted by protonhybrid:good 'facts' by you mate. like afghanistan is arab?
Wasn't Afghanistan invaded by Arabs? Is there no Ethnic Arab living in the country?
Are you denying that Arabs had destroyed evidence then and are still destroying evidence now?
Try and convince us first before you ask for sources again. We already know your style. -
Wah lau eh....you are really something....Originally posted by protonhybrid:that's a list of countries you provided. your source is google news? mate which nation owns it?
You are denying that the world has no conflict at all?
So, your source which nation owns it?
I let you answer your own question -
Look I've nothing agianst moslems...I know moslems that are more polite than non-moslems but that's not the point here...the germans and japanese are quite advanced during their times in WW2 yet even they can't help falling into their leaders hatred of jewsd and chinese.
Personally I'm sure we rather live under the rule of churchill coomonwealth law than Iran syriah law..I;m sure most civilised moslems will agree but if they dun..it's another story liao
-
I'm telling you the worldview of moslems and non moslems are there in regards of the support of USA and israel..non-moslems tend to be more supportive..why?Originally posted by Timmay:
The Malays could have built up Malaysia into a first world country
Together with the help of the Chinese and Malays
But by creating the Bumiputra policy
They left out the Chinese and Indians
Causing many of them to leave the country, still are
They could have contributed to the country in many ways
Also, the politicians essentially made the average Malaysian Malay lazier
"I'm sure the government would provide this and that for me, no need to work hard one"
This would be on any Malaysian Malay's mind
Now, removing the policy would be the last thing on any
Malay's mind -
Palestine celebration after 911 ,is this civilised?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJ0bWEnW_WU&feature=related -
Originally posted by protonhybrid:
No more source. You don't believe anyway.
l quote:Originally posted by googoomuck:
The Israelis are [b]special people. On the one hand, there are people who sympathize them. They faced persecution throughout history.
On the other hand, there are people who loathe them.
who doesn't think they're special?
quote:
News networks like CNN, BBC and of course the Arab owned ones are biasesd against them. Even the UN under Kofi Annan was biased against them when it drafted the resolutions for peace.
IF cnn, bbc are biased against israel and jews, then who does favour them? dont make a fool out of yourself, i urge you.
quote:Another instance is the Yom Kippur War. The Israelis were initially losing the war as the enemies launched a surprised attack when most of the Israeli citizen soldiers were congregated in the synagogues to pray.
the enemies? you seem to be siding with israelis instead of being a neutral observer reporting facts! hmmm.. Wink
quote:
Accept the US which swiftly shipped the war equipment to support the Israelis, no one else tried to stop the Arab Army's onslaught.
you meant 'except usa'....well it's the zionist regime's sole backer and as we all know and see usa' s days are numbered, zionist regime will probably vanish in a whimper.
quote:
When the tides were turned, the Egyptian Army chief suffered a heart attack. A 20,000 strong Egyptian army was under seige by Sharon's tanks and was in danger of been entirely wiped out. The Russians and the UN quickly demanded a truce to negotiate a ceasefire.
lol. source?
This time let you win.
Yes, the Arabs won the Yom Kippur War ( because I don't want to consider the end state)
Yes, the Arabs recaptured the Sinai ( I ignore the Camp David Accords)
Casualties
Israel
2,656 killed
7,250 wounded
400 tanks destroyed
600 tanks damaged/returned to service
102 planes shot down
Egypt, Syria, Iraq
8,528* – 15,000** each received 72 virgins
19,540* – 35,000** returned home safely
2,250 tanks became scrapped metal
432 planes did not return to base
You'd be happy ! -
Palestine celebration after 911 ,is this civilised?
That appears to be an anti-Palestinian propaganda video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJ0bWEnW_WU&feature=related
Footage of 9/11 Celebrations An Israeli Fake
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuvscDkrs3U
Below, however, is real, not propaganda.
The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9-11
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dancing+israelis+911&search=Search -
Face the truth if we do not want this
-
What truth?
-
Troubled future of the world:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w91MgE3mi80&NR=1
-
Like the conspiracy theoristsÂ’ and other dimwitsÂ’ beliefs that 9/11 attacks were plotted by the Israelis and the Bush Administration, I'm sure the Arab world and its supporters would also attempt to make us believe that the tape is 'highly suspect' even after it was broadcasted in Al Jareeza.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4clrHPMSh4
Quote:
Shortly before the U.S. presidential election in 2004, another taped statement was released and aired on Al Jazeera in which bin Laden abandoned his denials without retracting past statements. In it he told viewers he had personally directed the 19 hijackers, and gave what he claimed was his motivation:
I will explain to you the reasons behind these events, and I will tell you the truth about the moments when this decision was taken, so that you can reflect on it. God knows that the plan of striking the towers had not occurred to us, but the idea came to me when things went just too far with the American-Israeli alliance's oppression and atrocities against our people in Palestine and Lebanon.
According to the tapes, bin Laden claimed he was inspired to destroy the World Trade Center after watching the destruction of towers in Lebanon by Israel during the 1982 Lebanon War.
In two other tapes aired by Al Jazeera in 2006, Osama bin Laden announces,
I am the one in charge of the 19 brothers Â… I was responsible for entrusting the 19 brothers Â… with the raids [5 minute audiotape broadcast May 23, 2006],
and is seen with Ramzi Binalshibh, as well as two of the 9/11 hijackers, Hamza al-Ghamdi and Wail al-Shehri, as they make preparations for the attacks (videotape broadcast September 7, 2006) -
If malaysia and indo turn islamic states, sg trends towards that wil not be too far...
-
Like the conspiracy theoristsÂ’ and other dimwitsÂ’ beliefs that 9/11 attacks were plotted by the Israelis and the Bush Administration, I'm sure the Arab world and its supporters would also attempt to make us believe that the tape is 'highly suspect' even after it was broadcasted in Al Jareeza.
I just don't understand something
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4clrHPMSh4
Quote:
Shortly before the U.S. presidential election in 2004, another taped statement was released and aired on Al Jazeera in which bin Laden abandoned his denials without retracting past statements. In it he told viewers he had personally directed the 19 hijackers, and gave what he claimed was his motivation:
I will explain to you the reasons behind these events, and I will tell you the truth about the moments when this decision was taken, so that you can reflect on it. God knows that the plan of striking the towers had not occurred to us, but the idea came to me when things went just too far with the American-Israeli alliance's oppression and atrocities against our people in Palestine and Lebanon.
According to the tapes, bin Laden claimed he was inspired to destroy the World Trade Center after watching the destruction of towers in Lebanon by Israel during the 1982 Lebanon War.
In two other tapes aired by Al Jazeera in 2006, Osama bin Laden announces,
I am the one in charge of the 19 brothers Â… I was responsible for entrusting the 19 brothers Â… with the raids [5 minute audiotape broadcast May 23, 2006],
and is seen with Ramzi Binalshibh, as well as two of the 9/11 hijackers, Hamza al-Ghamdi and Wail al-Shehri, as they make preparations for the attacks (videotape broadcast September 7, 2006)
With all the conspiracy that Jews were responsible for the 9/11
And Osama declaring that he was responsible for it
Why haven't the Arabs invented the conspiracy that
Jews paid Osama for 9/11? -
There's also a conspiracy theory that Osama cannot be found or be killed because he's working for CIA.
-
Some of ther misconceptions of talmud the other teachings to the jews regarding gentiles that some views as racism:
http://www.angelfire.com/mt/talmud/ -
Let's face it the jews are talented people, perhaps the most talented group in the world despite their size.Envy give rise to jealousy then turn to hatred..why smart germans turn to nazism to rout out the jews?too much conspiracy theories I;m not saying all are false but you can't hang the whole group for the work of a few elite bankers that happens to be jews.Originally posted by Timmay:
I just don't understand something
With all the conspiracy that Jews were responsible for the 9/11
And Osama declaring that he was responsible for it
Why haven't the Arabs invented the conspiracy that
Jews paid Osama for 9/11? -
-
Zzzzz...
-
Originally posted by Catknight:Please remember while Israel may not have agood record as a western democratic, it is the only secular one in middle east
israel isn't western. nor is it secular. lol you made a complete fool out of yourself.
why is it a homeland for jews only then? why is it that israle allows persons from a certain religion only no matter where he was born to migrate to 'israel'? -
Originally posted by googoomuck:
a link will be appreciated. and kindly explain how polish, ukraininian, indian, ethiopian etc jews ALL are cananites?
Depends on which one you want to believe.
[b]Historical context / archaeological context (copied from a link provided by a Palestinian supporter)
Early History of the Region
Before the Hebrews first migrated there around 1800 B.C., the land of Canaan was occupied by Canaanites.
“Between 3000 and 1100 B.C., Canaanite civilization covered what is today Israel, the West Bank, Lebanon and much of Syria and Jordan...Those who remained in the Jerusalem hills after the Romans expelled the Jews [in the second century A.D.] were a potpourri: farmers and vineyard growers, pagans and converts to Christianity, descendants of the Arabs, Persians, Samaritans, Greeks and old Canaanite tribes.” Marcia Kunstel and Joseph Albright, “Their Promised Land.”
It is documented that after the Jews were expelled by the Romans, the old canaanites were still around. How they become extinct later you cannot blame the Jews because they(the Jews) had already vacated the land.
Biblical context (their God is also your God)
Specifically God was judging the Canaanites at that time, the Scripture says, for their gross idolatry, divination, witchcraft, sorcery, and mediums, i.e. those who call up the dead. In fact God says these "detestable practices" are the very reason they were driven out.
Likewise, God warned the Isralites "But if you do not drive out the inhabitants of the land, those you allow to remain will become barbs in your eyes and thorns in your sides. They will give you trouble in the land where you will live. And then I will do to you what I plan to do to them.' "
[/b] -
Originally posted by googoomuck:
mate your ignorance shines through (despite how ironic that may sound).
But what's wrong with that?
It's history. Christianity reached the continents first. If they didn't fight, all of Europe would have been converted to an alien religion.. Imperial Russia would have been 'converted'.
The early Europeans could cross the oceans to colonize the continents but the [b]Arabs couldn't.[/b]
I asked how did 4 out of six inhabited continents become almost entirely christian with no traces of any other religion left. answer that first.
then i will retort nicely and resoundingly to this shallow argument of yours. -
oh you support mass murder by christians eh? lol you just made a bigger fool out of yourself. and get your head out of your behind.Originally posted by googoomuck:But what's wrong with that?
It's history. Christianity reached the continents first. If they didn't fight, all of Europe would have been converted to an alien religion.. Imperial Russia would have been 'converted'.
The early Europeans could cross the oceans to colonize the continents but the Arabs couldn't.
Today, for every infidel killed by his enemies, the infidels eliminate more enemies in retaliation to maintain the status quo.
the most advanced society in europe was spain, andalusia i.e. thanks to arabs and muslims. it was ONLY after the fanatic christian murderers eliminated through extremely barbaric murders the inhabitants of spain, they went around murdering natives of south/central america. immediately after that. thanks to knowledge left behind by arabs
spaniards could never occupy arab lands though after such incidents.
and christianity also originates from the same region, arab today. stop spewing further garbage as this thread is getting polluted by your worthless tripe. speak some sense if you can, if you can't stop posting. -
Originally posted by Timmay:Which societies didn't gain from colonization?
Protonhybrid
From your history of posts
You are a vulgar person
Moreover, you seem to like to post questions
Just so that we'd do the research for you
Why don't you do it yourself?
what a buml!cker of a society are you from mate? you keep harping about colonization being a boon while it was undoubtedly a bane for almost all societies except for ilk of singapore which to this day remain a bastion of british colonialism.
NO CIVILIZED SOCIETY gained from colonization by anglophones or francophones for that matter.