Will Israel be peaceful in 2008?
-
No, you should be banned for even suggesting such fanatic thoughts. In fact history suggests as does present nuclear and othe WMD acquisition abilities show that RADICAL CHRISTIAN-zionist axis of terror is the worst threat facing the world.
Tell that to the suicide bombers who follow radical Islam
Out of world's six inhabited continents they've wiped 4 out of their original religions sometimes even inhabitants. half of africa too. and in asia they're gaining ground through treachery such is the menace.
I ask you, isn't radical Christianity-zionist axis a threat to entire world's peace?
Since they are a threat because they follow radical Islam
Thus, isn't radical Islam a threat?
Tell me than why isn't radical Islam a threat
I agree that many predominantly Christian countries have nuclear weapons
And other WMD
But the question is, have they used them on any countries at all?
Source please
Out of world's six inhabited continents they've wiped 4 out of their original religions sometimes even inhabitants. half of africa too. and in asia they're gaining ground through treachery such is the menace.you're the one without any sources i've provided plenty already. arabs have been living there and DO LIVE IN SURROUNDING countries. how come jews born in ukraine or poland can claim that palestine is theirs while so can those born in india or ethiopia?
"...you've not provided any sources for your claims..."?
yet you've not provided any sources for your claims or queries. or for that matter your speculations. i guess they're based on fantasies.
In an earlier post
"you call that nonbiased source Laughing that's a zionist source"
You contradict yourself.
Yet you state "yet you've not provided any sources for your claims or queries. or for that matter your speculations. i guess they're based on fantasies."
I've provided sources all the way from page 2 of this thread
You are the one living in fantasy -
in other words, you're shamless. and you're a shameless mindless fanatic who only believes without reason.
is that true?
that's fanatic zionist mindless idiotic retarded imbecile religious judaism for you!
not true judaism.
there are jews against israel too. israel has no right to exist, as zionism is a curse.Israel will never be peaceful for the simple reason it doesn't exist legally nor does it deserve to exist. stealing looting murdering isn't civilized behaviour. Of course there's an eery resemblance to bunch of workers coming from a certain nation settling in asean countries, and specifically making one such nation so badly 'infested' with them, that they got their own red dot for their independent nation.
britain which also played a part in illegal b@stard nation israel's creation played a part in this red dot's creation too. natives aren't the ones who aren't in majority, yet some of those fanatics from that group have the gall to even criticize or malign the very community, ethnic groups, religions, cultures etc that provided alms to these beggars to settle in asean region i nfirst place.Laughing hypocrisy at its best (worst, dep. on definition).
some b@stards brought over by british to lands that are foreign to them, then they become majority in tiny red dots or patch of lands thanks to british, and now they speak about democracy blah blah balh as their masters chant.
yet when it comes to facts they backtrack. in the region they occupy aren't the majority the very same groups they fight against and oppose. what retarded mentality is that? or is it hypocrisy at its worst/best again dep. on defn?well mate, that shows what a bloody bumlicker you're! now go kiss your master britain's smelly or plump or whatever it is ar$e!
and fyi, no not everybody 'gained' from colonization as they already had advanced knowledge, great societies in place. and no nor was everybody colonized.
brainwashed moron, if you're talking of uk.usa etc as 'allied powers', you already are speaking english and your forefathers have been doing so for centuries now thanks to the bloody anglophones already colonizing you and nothing changed for you. your leaders llike you are actually such great bumlickers that you like getting colonized Laughing typical of shameless stateless roving nomadic barbarian creatures.
now you're all agog about usa and uk. i dont see what difference is there.
churchill was a mongrel b@stard who've done nothing but sneakyy acts. he's a son of a b1tch from usa. and then his father who visited a harlot in usa found churchill's mother, story of churchill's birth. churchill's @$$ was still sore after losing to ottomans and ataturk in gallipolli (so did anzac, aus/nz)
And finally
Mr. Green what a buml!cker of a society are you from mate? you keep harping about colonization being a boon while it was undoubtedly a bane for almost all societies except for ilk of singapore which to this day remain a bastion of british colonialism.
NO CIVILIZED SOCIETY gained from colonization by anglophones or francophones for that matter.
Protonhybrid hahaha
it seems that when somebody loses an argument they can't put forth any more logical arguments or analysis they resort to personal insults or such.
mate IF you feel so insignificant being anglophone's servants, you can go for psychological therapy to boost your self confidence. no need to imagine everyone is a slave or must be a slave.
i see that freedom of thought expression ideas etc is lost on you. this concept doesn't exist for you sadly. that's the harmful aftermath of serving anglophones for too long to remember.
Going by your history of posts
I didn't know you are such a joker
Are you a stand-up comedian by chance?
So you admit that you lose the arguments all the time?(Look at your posts)
Hence you resort to insults?(Most of the time)
You are the real fanatic here
Hence fanatics should be banned from this forum
Err...That's you right?
"mate IF you feel so insignificant being losing arguments, you can go for psychological therapy to boost your self confidence."oh btw not replying to spartans but other losers like timmay etc
You are at it again
here's another source on british and israeli heist and terror
http://www.captiveminds.org/Poli/inpali.htm
You keep saying about posting neutral sources but yet your source is a Muslim
one, how neutral is that?
I do check the "About Us" section
You know?however state of israel being LESS advanced than almost all western european nations or germany or other nations shows that jews are probably not what you call them. probably.
Source? -
I somewhat enjoy debating in this thread
Against Poh Ah Pak etc
However, I can't stand Protonhybrid's insults of people who disagree with him
I really do hope that he'd shed that negative habit of his
-
Radical moslem groups in palestine and their counterparts worldwide always accused of crusaders incursion against them but forget what they done against all the non-moslem countries from north africa to asia. before the crusades
Poor record of dhimmitude policies and even if it not spread by sword..the state will turned islamic once the demographics turned moslem as history showns..
Will there be exceptions in the future of muslim states that separates mosque and state?We just have to wait and see but so far there's none -
Muslim brotherhood plans for US is more frightening than Europe:
Over the last 40 years, small groups of devout Muslim men have gathered in homes in U.S. cities to pray, memorize the Koran and discuss events of the day. But they also addressed their ultimate goal, one so controversial that it is a key reason they have operated in secrecy: to create Muslim states overseas and, they hope, someday in America as well. Â…
Brotherhood members emphasize that they follow the laws of the nations in which they operate. They stress that they do not believe in overthrowing the U.S. government, but rather that they want as many people as possible to convert to Islam so that one day—perhaps generations from now—a majority of Americans will support a society governed by Islamic law.
."
Would jefferson if alive will allow even mosques to be build in every US city if he's alive ?
USA will be DSA (Divided states of America) soon if it allowas MB to continue -
Israel fight is the fight of all infidels and moslems who believer in a free worldOriginally posted by Timmay:I somewhat enjoy debating in this thread
Against Poh Ah Pak etc
However, I can't stand Protonhybrid's insults of people who disagree with him
I really do hope that he'd shed that negative habit of his
"Benjamin Netanyahu, leader of the Israeli Likud party said, trying to disparage his enemies: 'The celebrated goal of Islamic Fundamentalism is to secure the worldwide victory of Islam by defeating the non-Muslim and infidels through Jihaad...'. Thank you very much, Mr. Netanyahu, for a very accurate description. "
--Muhammad 'Abdus Salam Faraj, Jihad: The Absent Obligation -
whoa timmay...relax man...this aint our fight. besides, u jewish?
-
Sad to say the fight already started worldwide with western world the first to bear the brunt, after their fall, they will turn their atttention to rest of the non-moslem world which they seen as western followersOriginally posted by lookingr82nite:whoa timmay...relax man...this aint our fight. besides, u jewish?
-
Participants and readers of this thread have seen for yourselves how the two camps discuss and argue the issues.
By now you must have a feeling of how frustrated the Israelis must be when they negotiate for peace with the Palestinian Arabs.
-
whoa timmay...relax man...this aint our fight. besides, u jewish?
Just standing up for what I believe in
Haha nope
Chinese Buddhist
That's what it says on my IC
But not practising Buddhism anymoreBy now you must have a feeling of how frustrated the Israelis must be when they negotiate for peace with the Palestinian Arabs.
Around 85%? -
hmmm.....I see. singapore I think has an arab street. and arabs from yemen form a minority in singpaore too. although merely less than 1% of population. does that make singapore arab?Originally posted by googoomuck:Former President of Afghanistan, Sibghatullah Mojadadi, a descendant of the first wave of Arabs into the region.
Don't believe me? You ask Sibghatullah Mojadadi.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Singaporean -
btw wiki is generally unreliable. and i found this on
http://www.afghanan.net/afghanistan/mojaddedi.htm
Sibghatullah Mojaddedi
Pir Sibghatullah Mojaddedi was born in 1925 in Herat province in western Afghanistan, Pashtun spiritual leader of the Naqshbandi Sufi order; designated after Bahauddin Naqshband, who died in1389.
Mujaddedi was the leading survivor of this extraordinarily influential family which had emigrated from India at the beginning of the century. -
The Arabs invaded parts of present day India, including Sirhind between 713 AD - 1300 AD. Can or not?Originally posted by protonhybrid:btw wiki is generally unreliable. and i found this on
http://www.afghanan.net/afghanistan/mojaddedi.htm
The Arabs in India then emigrated to Afganistan. Can or not?
The fact remains that Sibghatullah Mojaddedi is of Arab descent and he's born in Afghanistan.
You said that there's no Arab in Afghanistan.
And why are you getting your source from Google? Which nation owns it? -
Bush now want israel and palestine 2 state to be in peace..if he can do it...he will be famour laio
-
Bush's last throw against Iran
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JA10Ak03.html
Bush visits the good and bad guys in the Middle East
http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080109/95914122.html
Mideast peace process, a hard nut for weak Bush
http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/6335448.html -
And I thought this thread was dead -
Iran is the wild card now..if he wants to build up hitlerism in his country and spread to mideast..israel will be on the fringe ofbeing exterminated
-
How come suddenly Iran connected with Hitler?
-
Catknight, you are pro-Israel and anti-Iran, I have an idea that can kill two birds with one stone for you.
Why don't we set the Syrians against Iran by pushing it eastwards?
USA troops withdraw from Iraq, reach a deal to allow Syrian troops to enter Iraq as "peacekeepers".
Iran have their own interests in Iraq, if Syria competes with Iran in Iraq for influence, it's just a matter of time before the two fight each other.
I think we can instigate a Syrian-Iranian war and let the two finish each other off.
Israel can profit from this.
What do you think Catknight? -
[quote]
History of one of my posts. A solution is offered(right at the bottom of this post).Originally posted by googoomuck:
90%-95% OF ALL THE CONFLICTS ON THIS PLANET TODAY INVOLVE MUSLIMS FIGHTING NON-MUSLIMS OR EACH OTHER!
75% if you do not count Israel, Iraq and Afganistan where US and her Allies are involved. They can always argue that the West invaded Iraq and Afganistan.
They cannot claim to be innocent for the rest of the conflicts in the world.Originally posted by protonhybrid:
as false 'info' normally dont have a source and easy to disprove by asking for a source, i do this: where is your source?Originally posted by googoomuck:
Still want sources?
I provide a list of countries:
Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco, Ivory Coast, Chad, Eritrea, Sudan, Somalia, Nigeria, Kashmir, Bangladesh, India, Parkistan, fatah-hamas in Gaza , Philippines, S. Thailand, insurgency in Saudi Arabia, Kurds-Turks in Turkey, civil war in Iraq, Yemen, Greece, Albania, macedonia, Bosnia, Chechnya, Georgia, Dagestan, China, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Tajikistan, CyprusÂ…..
...the list can be further expanded
Just google any country in the list and get the source.Originally posted by protonhybrid:
that's a list of countries you provided. your source is google news? mate which nation owns it?Originally posted by googoomuck:
Wah lau eh....you are really something....
You are denying that the world has no conflict at all?
So, your source which nation owns it?
I let you answer your own questionOriginally posted by protonhybrid:
dont speak singlish it's gross and appalling.
if i ask you a question, it's expected that you answer it.
basic courtesy mate.
The way you deny the facts really amazes me. Alright, you can browse in the libraries or buy books from the book stores. Again, you might ask who own the libraries or the book stores or who author the books.
I have an idea. Why donÂ’t you become a scientist and turn back time. Then you can rewrite history and the facts anyway you want. ThatÂ’s the only way to silent your critics.
mate you're the one in denial. You stated that 90-95% of all conflicts on this planet at this time involve muslims fighting each other or others.
Where did you pull this figure out from? from your an.us?
How else did you get to QUANTIFY this baseless statement? And when I ask for proof, you ask me to go look up google on a number of countries. about 57 of world's ~200 countries are muslim majority, do you want me to dig up stories on other religion's majority countries' conflicts?
That only causes more misunderstanding and division. You're one troublemaker who needs to be behind bars. -
Spartans you're taking idiocity to a whole new low. stop spewing meaningless cr@p or bullsh!t or whatever it's that you savour so much.Originally posted by Spartans:Neutral sources? How do you define a neutral sources then?
If I am chirping meaningless crap, then you must be spewing stinky bullsh!t. code:neutral adj. Not aligned with, supporting, or favoring either side in a war, dispute, or contest. -
It's up to you, moron ! You are six years old kid or what? I'm not here to spoon feed you with facts. Give you tips and you ask for more?Originally posted by protonhybrid:mate you're the one in denial. You stated that 90-95% of all conflicts on this planet at this time involve muslims fighting each other or others.
Where did you pull this figure out from? from your an.us?
How else did you get to QUANTIFY this baseless statement? And when I ask for proof, you ask me to go look up google on a number of countries. about 57 of world's ~200 countries are muslim majority, do you want me to dig up stories on other religion's majority countries' conflicts?
That only causes more misunderstanding and division. You're one troublemaker who needs to be behind bars. -
Originally posted by Spartans:
dont talk irrelevant issues here. i dont recall saying singaporean chinese are pathetic losers or anything to that effect, whatever my intentions be.
Haiz u are really nothing but a pathetic loser. You are the first to insult Singaporean Chinese and you still dare to blatantly deny it. You have a malicious mindset against the Chinese right? That is why you love to drag Singaporean Chinese into these Middle Eastern topics.
it is singaporean chinese forumers in HERE that are dragging themselves into this middle eastern affair.
goes to show how badly indoctrinated you've been by yankee cowboy hillybilly marauding murderous idiotic propaganda.
Your mindless insults are here for all to see.
We have our independent thinking, unless you sucker. Go back and suck your Arab masters dicks ba. -
Originally posted by Spartans:
good on chinese. congratulations to chinese for this. however i dont see why you've to call malaysia/indonesia adverse places. they're your neighbours and you should learn to get alone.
oh so sorry to disappoint you that I do not have a inferior complex. We Chinese are able to survive in anywhere even in adverse places like Indonesia and Malaysia.
come again.
But the same thing cannot be said for a Pig and Human hybrid like yourself.
now that part in bold tells me what this is all about. ah i see.
Omg I have degraded and condesecended myself so much to engage in useless arguments with a hybrid like you. I must be losing my sanity. How can a hybrid understand the intricate world of human?
i'd urge your friends and families if possible to get you a shrink. -
Lee kuan Yew is an idiot, he also advocates racial superiority among other things. Of course somebody was parroting nazi germany was "evil" since supposedly some race was held to be inferior, what do we see now from this ugly old twerp? more of the same.Originally posted by Catknight:Lee Kuan Yew, former prime minister of Singapore, answering the question, how serious is the threat of radical Islam: "This battle is going to be won and lost in the Middle East. The problem in Iraq is very grave. If the jihadists win there, I'm in trouble here. [Their attitude will be]: We've beaten the Russians in Afghanistan, we've beaten the Americans and the coalition in Iraq. There's nothing we cannot do. We can fix Southeast Asia too. There will be such a surge of confidence for all jihadists. The U.S. must be seen—if not to have prevailed or to have created a democratic Iraq—to at least to have denied the jihadists a victory. Because otherwise the consequences for America and for the world are horrendous."
moreover he doesn't think twice bending over and licking his master anglopohne's bu.tts.