06 Dec, 12:29AM in sunny Singapore!

Singaporeans' 2007 income rose 9.6%

Subscribe to Singaporeans' 2007 income rose 9.6% 49 posts

Please Login or Signup to reply.
  • qlqq9's Avatar
    4,929 posts since Jul '07
    • Another piece of propaganda article from the PAP controlled press.   ST never stop publishing articles in the name of propaganda.

      ___________

      S'poreans' 2007 household income rose 9.6% - fastest in a decade - Wed, Feb 13, 2008
      The Straits Times

      THE average monthly household income of Singaporeans rose by 9.6 per cent to $6,280 in 2007 - the fast growth over the last decade, spurred by better wages on the back of a robust economy and a tight labour market.

      But reflecting the widening income gap, higher-income households continued to take home more pay, with higher wage increases for skilled and knowledge workers, according to a paper on key household income trends in 2007 released by the Singapore Department of Statistics on Wednesday.

      Among employed households - those with at least one working person - average monthly household income from work grew by 9.1 per cent to reach $6,830.

      After adjusing for inflation, these households enjoyed real income growth of 6.9 per cent last year.

       

      Half of the employed households had monthly income of at least $4,870, compared to the median household income of $4,500 in 2006.

      DOS said every household member from all income groups experienced increases income from work 'in real terms' in 2007.

      On the widening income distribution between the higher and lower-income households, DOS said the Gini coefficient, which measures income inequality, went up from 0.472 in 2006 to 0.485 in 2007.

      But the Government's GST (goods and services tax) offset package, which was weighted in favour of the lower-income groups, has helped mitigate the effects of widening household income disparity, it noted.

      After adjusting for Government benefits and taxes, DOS said the Gini coefficient among employed households was lower at 0.460 in 2007, compared with 0.485 before adjustment.

      More details on the household income trends in 2007 can be found on http://www.singstat.gov.sg.

      <!-- CONTENT : end --><!-- reader comment start --> <!-- story rating start -->

       

  • qlqq9's Avatar
    4,929 posts since Jul '07
    • Discrepancy in the percentage.  The Chinese channel 8 stated it is 10% as compared to what asiaone.com stated.   The gahmen can't even get their figure right

  • Medicated Oil's Avatar
    2,263 posts since Dec '03
    • This must the biggest statistical BS announced before the budget.

      Just ask the people around you, I have yet to know any one that is having a 10% increase in income.

      I only know that the value of money have shrinked with the shameful inflation incurred by the shamelessly greedy poodles.

       

  • 798's Avatar
    29,220 posts since Jun '03
  • 333225520's Avatar
    369 posts since Apr '04
    • Could it be due to somebody who increased their own multi-millions salaries which pull up the overall average? icon_rolleyes.gif

  • eagle's Avatar
    18,012 posts since Aug '01
    • Originally posted by 333225520:

      Could it be due to somebody who increased their own multi-millions salaries which pull up the overall average? icon_rolleyes.gif

      not somebody, but some group of people
      And almost everyone else in that same sector had a pay raise too.

  • eagle's Avatar
    18,012 posts since Aug '01
  • caleb_chiang's Avatar
    7,951 posts since Jul '05
  • BangHong's Avatar
    1,115 posts since Sep '03
  • HyperFocal's Avatar
    1,900 posts since Jul '07
    • ... where the hell did they get the stats from?

       

       

      ===================================================

      S'poreans' 2007 household income rose 9.6% - fastest in a decade  
      Wed, Feb 13, 2008
      The Straits Times
        
       
      THE average monthly household income of Singaporeans rose by 9.6 per cent to $6,280 in 2007 - the fast growth over the last decade, spurred by better wages on the back of a robust economy and a tight labour market.

      But reflecting the widening income gap, higher-income households continued to take home more pay, with higher wage increases for skilled and knowledge workers, according to a paper on key household income trends in 2007 released by the Singapore Department of Statistics on Wednesday.

      Among employed households - those with at least one working person - average monthly household income from work grew by 9.1 per cent to reach $6,830.

       

       
      After adjusing for inflation, these households enjoyed real income growth of 6.9 per cent last year.

      Half of the employed households had monthly income of at least $4,870, compared to the median household income of $4,500 in 2006.

      DOS said every household member from all income groups experienced increases income from work 'in real terms' in 2007.

      On the widening income distribution between the higher and lower-income households, DOS said the Gini coefficient, which measures income inequality, went up from 0.472 in 2006 to 0.485 in 2007.

      But the Government's GST (goods and services tax) offset package, which was weighted in favour of the lower-income groups, has helped mitigate the effects of widening household income disparity, it noted.

      After adjusting for Government benefits and taxes, DOS said the Gini coefficient among employed households was lower at 0.460 in 2007, compared with 0.485 before adjustment.

      More details on the household income trends in 2007 can be found on http://www.singstat.gov.sg.
       

  • Lin Yu's Avatar
    2,893 posts since Jul '07
    • why can't they show the ppl the numbers in income gap before averaging up.

       

      if these figures are true, where did all the poor people come from?

       

  • Ed11790's Avatar
    1,068 posts since Feb '08
  • qlqq9's Avatar
    4,929 posts since Jul '07
    • I have always have doubt about figures given by them.   I doubt they are sincere to be accurate in their finding.  

      The most laughable thing is asiaone.com said it is 9.6% but over at channel 8 from the brief mobile news text, it stated is 10%.   See they can't even agree on the same figure, so expect all of us to believe them.   Be it 9.6% or 10%, looks clear they are not sincere at all.  

  • Ed11790's Avatar
    1,068 posts since Feb '08
  • qlqq9's Avatar
    4,929 posts since Jul '07
    • Originally posted by Ed11790:

      9.6 and 10 is pretty much the same......they just round it up so it looks better

      Don't think they should round it up.  

  • Ed11790's Avatar
    1,068 posts since Feb '08
  • qlqq9's Avatar
    4,929 posts since Jul '07
    • Originally posted by Ed11790:

      its only .4.....not much differentomg.png


      Every number counts OK.  

  • googoomuck's Avatar
    1,912 posts since Feb '06
  • weiqimun's Avatar
    805 posts since May '06
    • my increment is less than 2%. ~grin & bear it~

      inspite of what is said abt job creation/etc.by the media/gahmen, i have been told tt nobody's job in the company is secure.

      i agree some are more lucky than me,

      FOr me, I need to get real!

  • eagle's Avatar
    18,012 posts since Aug '01
    • No matter what they say, I'm still aiming for 10k per month within 3~5 years of graduation.

  • charlize's Avatar
    8,526 posts since Mar '05
    • Originally posted by eagle:

      No matter what they say, I'm still aiming for 10k per month within 3~5 years of graduation.

       You can be MP within 3 - 5 years of graduation?

      Really? icon_lol.gif

       

       

  • fymk's Avatar
    3,803 posts since Sep '04
    • Originally posted by eagle:

      No matter what they say, I'm still aiming for 10k per month within 3~5 years of graduation.

      To achieve that , your most probable options are:

      A. Have a rich daddy with a company .

      B. to run for MP and win the campaign

      C. work in two jobs

      D. Marry a heiress to a large company

      E. Get headhunted

       

      Or else you will be bitter and twisted from the frustration.

       

       

  • Googlelian's Avatar
    69 posts since Feb '08
  • Googlelian's Avatar
    69 posts since Feb '08
  • Panache1976's Avatar
    76 posts since Jun '07
    • I think it's sad whenever the average income pulls away from the median income. Singapore's income curve used to be more bell-shaped. Now it's skewing towards the left, like the US, meaning the rich are getting richer. If PAP wants to maintain social order, they must look towards increasing the income of the lower quartiles. I am all for a minimum wage scheme to redistribute income more fairly. Yes, labour and prices will go up, but it will mostly be bourne by the rich and well-off, who can well afford it.

Please Login or Signup to reply.