Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by Uncle Ver SG @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:59:28 +0800

Uncle Ver SG — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:59:28 +0800

He didnt win in a landslide you know.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by Uncle Ver SG @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:58:58 +0800

Uncle Ver SG — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:58:58 +0800

Yeah how to get paid well and run a one party system. Does Ma Ying Jeou want to revert back to old KMT? Is he not worried that after one term the same "xia tai" cry will be applied to him too.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by kingchan @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:55:28 +0800

kingchan — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:55:28 +0800

Originally posted by drawer:

Ma Ying Jeou praise Singapore perhaps he was visiting Singapore at that time.If i am visiting a country,i will also praise that country more or less.Out of courtesy,or whatever u may call it.

But i believe,whats more important is his "action".I believe Ma also know our PAP style of ruling is not suitable for Taiwan,as they have been through this one party ruling stage before as well.

Ma Ying Jeou praised singapore government just recently after he won the Taiwan elections. He says there is much to learn from the sg government.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by fishbuff @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:22:54 +0800

fishbuff — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:22:54 +0800

Originally posted by t_a_s:

his assets worth billions of dollars, dont know keep where

will he sacrifice a thousand virgins and kill off several battalion of SAF soldiers to bury with him?

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by t_a_s @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:11:48 +0800

t_a_s — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:11:48 +0800

his assets worth billions of dollars, dont know keep where

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by qlqq9 @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:27:34 +0800

qlqq9 — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:27:34 +0800

Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:

Lee Kuan Yew won't give up power.

The only way he will leave is when he dies.

The reason why he refuses to retire is his fear of losing power.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by qlqq9 @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:26:53 +0800

qlqq9 — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:26:53 +0800

Race does not matter. The most important is the PM serves the people with genuine heart, passion, compassion, commitment, kindness, fairness, intelligence and so on. These which I just mentioned are not found in lhl the ah qua kia.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by drawer @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:25:02 +0800

drawer — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:25:02 +0800

Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:

Lee Kuan Yew won't give up power.

The only way he will leave is when he dies.

Amen....

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by Poh Ah Pak @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:23:40 +0800

Poh Ah Pak — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:23:40 +0800

Lee Kuan Yew won't give up power.

The only way he will leave is when he dies.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by drawer @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:23:23 +0800

drawer — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:23:23 +0800

Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:

CNN has improved, it used to be very biased in favour of USA policies.

Fox news is the worst, nothing but propaganda drivel.

LOL.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by drawer @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:22:20 +0800

drawer — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:22:20 +0800

Originally posted by Airbus330Captain:

LKY is earning 3 million $ a year at the age of 80 plus, do you think he will step down with that kind of money he earns?

Well,if i were him,i will step down.I believe LKY's wealth already accumulated to a figure that even if he retired n stay at home watching TV 24/7,for dont know how many years to come,he also dont need to worry about money.

During this point,reputation will turn out to be more important than money.If i were LKY,i will definitely step down than to be cursed by my countrymen n women days n nights.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by Poh Ah Pak @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:22:10 +0800

Poh Ah Pak — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:22:10 +0800

CNN has improved, it used to be very biased in favour of USA policies.

Fox news is the worst, nothing but propaganda drivel.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by drawer @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:17:09 +0800

drawer — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:17:09 +0800

Now i like to watch Taiwan's news or CNN,i dont watch Singapore's propaganda news anymore.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by Airbus330Captain @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:14:59 +0800

Airbus330Captain — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:14:59 +0800

LKY is earning 3 million $ a year at the age of 80 plus, do you think he will step down with that kind of money he earns?

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by Poh Ah Pak @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:05:35 +0800

Poh Ah Pak — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:05:35 +0800

PAP style of rule can only work on apathetic and politically ignorant population.

Depoliticised people.

They are easy to fool.

Taiwan so many political talkshows and their media is so politicised, the Taiwanese watch this type of media they have become very politicised people.

They won't be fooled that easily.

PAP will die if it tries its crap in Taiwan.

Only Singaporeans will swallow PAP's bullshit.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by drawer @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:00:26 +0800

drawer — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:00:26 +0800

Ma Ying Jeou praise Singapore perhaps he was visiting Singapore at that time.If i am visiting a country,i will also praise that country more or less.Out of courtesy,or whatever u may call it.

But i believe,whats more important is his "action".I believe Ma also know our PAP style of ruling is not suitable for Taiwan,as they have been through this one party ruling stage before as well.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by Poh Ah Pak @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:52:49 +0800

Poh Ah Pak — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:52:49 +0800

They suck both PRC and USA cock.

Ma Ying Jeou for some strange reason also sings the praises of PAP.

Very strange.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by drawer @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:50:35 +0800

drawer — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:50:35 +0800

Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:

I think it is misleading to label PAP regime communist, since it does not believe in or practise communism.

It might confuse people.

Singapore can be called a one-party state, a democratic facade, a despotic regime or authoritarian state.

This is more clear.

Tell that to our Lee's family,they are cork sucking Communist China more than ever.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by 798 @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:47:30 +0800

798 — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:47:30 +0800

frankly speaking, i dun trust indians. cos they have the tend to change policy like flicking roti prata.

just like the former education minister who cmi!

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by Poh Ah Pak @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:46:36 +0800

Poh Ah Pak — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:46:36 +0800

I think it is misleading to label PAP regime communist, since it does not believe in or practise communism.

It might confuse people.

Singapore can be called a one-party state, a democratic facade, a despotic regime or authoritarian state.

This is more clear.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by drawer @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:42:21 +0800

drawer — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:42:21 +0800

Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:

Why you label PAP regime as communist drawer?

Communist doctrine is to create a classless society, but singapore is now divided into three classes, one elite class, one middle class and one poor class.

Although by right,Communist policy is to create a "classless" society.But,due to the fact that there is no general election,only one party,communist party is running the country.Therefore,only privilege ppl enjoy privilege treatment,while the majorities suffers.Look a Soviet Union,u will know why it falls.

Singapore,on the other hand,although got general election.But,only 2 opposition seats hanging in the parliament like Ding Dong Bell.And similar to Communist state,only privilege ppl enjoy privilege treatment,the majorities suffers.So to me,our country is no difference to a Communist country.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by Poh Ah Pak @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:30:05 +0800

Poh Ah Pak — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:30:05 +0800

Why you label PAP regime as communist drawer?

Communist doctrine is to create a classless society, but singapore is now divided into three classes, one elite class, one middle class and one poor class.

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by drawer @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:28:15 +0800

drawer — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:28:15 +0800

Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:

I would not be as harsh on the PAP ruling clique.

There is actually only one ruler of Singapore and that is Lee Kuan Yew.

There are good things to say about Lee Kuan Yew and there are bad things to say about Lee Kuan Yew.

That is a topic for historians.

But one thing is for sure.

Lee Kuan Yew's era must end now or Singapore will never improve, never progress, the people will never mature and will never develop their talents to the full potential under Lee Kuan Yew's ruling style.

So I say, thank you Lee Kuan Yew, but please fuck off now Lee Kuan Yew.

50 years is enough.

Fidel Castro also stepped down. He came to power in 1959, same as you.

It is time Lee Kuan Yew.

There is a chinese saying, if one picks something up, one must also be wise enough to know when to let go.

Lee Kuan Yew clearly have no idea when to let go.

True,this Lee Kuan Yew really need to go.He proves to be a terrible politician during his old age,just like Mao Ze Dong,who dont know when to let go.Sad isnt it?.....

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by drawer @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:23:28 +0800

drawer — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:23:28 +0800

Originally posted by kench-an:

Now, you ask why PAP folks can't bring down the costs. Actually it's possible. First, we must control the oil supply from those angmohs and invade Mid-East. Control oil supply and you can have cheap oil. Expensive food? Blame global warming for wreaking havoc, and Argentinian PM for raising farm tax, so our soya bean gets pricier to quote an example.

Oh,now u act like those PAP ministers,blame the worldwide oil price and food price surge for the culprit of cost of living rises.No doubt oil price n food supply does cause an impact to our living,but,our government can help reduce the impact by imposing some of the controllable factors to reduce the cost.

Take Taxi fares for instance,the government increase taxi fare saying they are helping taxi drivers to increase their income n reduce the impact of the global oil price surge on them.

But,if the government want to reduce the impact of oil price surge n increase taxi driver's income,they could have just reduce their "Rental fees".Let say,from 90 dollars per day to 60 dollars per day.In that way,it will relieve taxi driver's financial burden and also,wont cause taxi passengers to pay unreasonable fares when they take taxi to work when emergency.(Cost of taxi fares from Ang Mo Kio to Orchard during peak hours=$18++,Non peak hours=9.00+)[

But did our Communist PAP government do that?No,instead,they raise taxi fees n make taxi drivers more difficult to find passengers to take their cabs n commuters to pay for ridiculous high price for taking a cabs.Our Communist PAP government just sit down there n let the cost of living surging.Now,who's fault is it?

Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM replied by redDUST @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:53:21 +0800

redDUST — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:53:21 +0800

Originally posted by kench-an:

You guys think PAP is so bad, every other govt is so much better. Take a trip outside your bloody HDB flat and see for yourself, how other countries are like.

PAP greedy? Selfish? Like all the world's politicians are so kind? 7% GST you all complain, want to be like those Scandinavian countries whose tax goes beyond 50%? I'm also hit hard by the rising costs, but if you can't do anything about it, just shut up, bear it and grin it.

Now, you ask why PAP folks can't bring down the costs. Actually it's possible. First, we must control the oil supply from those angmohs and invade Mid-East. Control oil supply and you can have cheap oil. Expensive food? Blame global warming for wreaking havoc, and Argentinian PM for raising farm tax, so our soya bean gets pricier to quote an example.

Maybe you let WP win for once and see for yourself how 'holy' your dear politicians are. People are sometimes anti-establishment, voting for the opposition not bcos it's better, but to see the govt lose. We let them lose and we see how things improve.

Hope you realise all politicians are crap. They're just there for money and power and fame. Indian or Chinese or Malay. Or angmoh.

I hate to admit it, but there are some truth in what you say. There are indeed very few good governance of countries out there that you can point to, especially in relatively young nation like Singapore.

There are definitely areas the PAP can improve. I for one do not subscribe to all that PAP presribed. I think they hoard too much money for a start, and do not subscribe to their rationale of pay to the government. They also could have done more to the lower strata of the society here.

However, you cannot deny the fact that today, your living conditions is not worse off than any of the countries that has gotten their independance post WWII.

Recent Posts in 'Our Chinese PAP leaders sucks,we should have an Indian PM' | sgForums.com