what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:41:19 +0800

Atobe — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:41:19 +0800

Originally posted by kiekergaard:

I laughed at the people here trying to assert their respective positions about Ms. Lim, even to the extent of mentioning their assessment of the "type" of person she is.

Haha, hello, so what if she's eloquent enough to express her views in such a beautiful way? TS jealous ah? LOL.

It's like watching a troupe of blind people pointing out where the elephants or tigers are in a circus- they don't even know if the elephants or tigers exist in the first place!

How did one limping man even escape such a high security place unnoticed? It's not a hospital you know. And if they want to fire someone, I don't really care who they fire, I'm more interested in them debunking the various conspiracy theories that are flying around the internet and such.

Till today, his escape still remains a mystery to me. I just cannot, for the life of me, fathom how the hell he managed to escape. It's so unbelievable that I'm better off believing that he's actually dead by the hands of the people there.

The thought of MSK's death was a plausible factor from the beginning - considering the very surprising low operational standards that were initiated to pursue and recapture MSK..

The entire search and recapture efforts - that was initiated immediately and cointinuing the next morning - was incredibly of ''keystone cop standard''.

The search was confined to less then two kilometer radius from the Detention Centre after more then 14 hours since MSK's escape.

It was only on the fourth day after the escape that a mystery lady lecturer surfaced from the wood work claiming her sighting of MSK on the loose about one hour after the escape was realised - and heading in the opposite direction of the seach and almost 1.5 km from the WRDC.

WKS retort to WP Low Thia Kiang's remarks of public speculation that ''MSK is dead'', was quite 'dead pan' with WKS asking WP Low if he believe the speculation himself.

Catherine Lim's letter was no longer discussing MSK escape, but was her critique of the Government's dispensing of punishment only to the lower ranks prsonnel, while the Political Leadership walked free.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by kiekergaard @ Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:15:39 +0800

kiekergaard — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:15:39 +0800

I laughed at the people here trying to assert their respective positions about Ms. Lim, even to the extent of mentioning their assessment of the "type" of person she is.

Haha, hello, so what if she's eloquent enough to express her views in such a beautiful way? TS jealous ah? LOL.

It's like watching a troupe of blind people pointing out where the elephants or tigers are in a circus- they don't even know if the elephants or tigers exist in the first place!

How did one limping man even escape such a high security place unnoticed? It's not a hospital you know. And if they want to fire someone, I don't really care who they fire, I'm more interested in them debunking the various conspiracy theories that are flying around the internet and such.

Till today, his escape still remains a mystery to me. I just cannot, for the life of me, fathom how the hell he managed to escape. It's so unbelievable that I'm better off believing that he's actually dead by the hands of the people there.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:59:04 +0800

Atobe — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:59:04 +0800

Originally posted by Point_blank:

With your anticipated crap post that provided no evidence to back up your statements, you, Asswipe Atobe, had proven yourself nothing more than a piece of shit BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT. Out of respect for the owners of this site, I rest my case.

With a 'Point_blank' mind that refuse to allow any points to fill the vast cavity, what other points can you delude yourself with except to believe in your own vain speculation of my failing ?

After vandalising this site across two pages, it is about time that you make amends if you cannot even point out which part of my post lacks the supporting evidence.

Does anyone need to speculate the reasons for you to take a rest and abandon your useless pursuit in a vain attempt to flatten me ?

Coming from a 'Point_blank' position, you have already shown yourself to be impotent to crumble my points, as you have nothing to offer - not even the ability to show where the lies that you claim exist.

All that you can do is to resort to loud juvenile insults, and childish acts of that is similar to those dibilated with autistic disease in the repetitive actions - which in your case is your autistic repetitive postings of 'blank_points'.

Rest your case ?

Are you still stuffed with vanity in deluding yourself playing to the gallery ?

If you must rest after being consistently swiped, you should have done so a few days earlier when you mentioned you will be gone for a long while - or did you quote your 'Point_blank' thoughts out of context ?

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by lotus999 @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:20:42 +0800

lotus999 — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:20:42 +0800

<I disagree with her that she should use such strong emotive words like , deeply dissapointed, saddened by the decisions made by govt, (somewhere along this line), because she could influence many people.>

there must be reasons for her to be influential.

<To catherine, pls stop expressing your powerful english essays on local media again....>

because some people can't handle the truths!

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by redDUST @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:57:00 +0800

redDUST — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:57:00 +0800

after countless regurgitations, an anti-climatic end.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:26:52 +0800

Point_blank — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:26:52 +0800

Originally posted by Atobe:

Does it really make me look bad, or does it not reveal the 'Point_blank' side of you that is shown to be bankrupt of further words or hard 'points' to debunk all that have been said in my post ?

Do you think that this simplisic juvenile efforts at vandalising this thread can hope to help you score some desparate points in your 'Point_blank' score card ?

One can lead an ass to the water, but if the ass refuse to take a sip - can one swipe the ass to do so ?

Even if the ass refuse to drink, it will surely be made to carry the burden under pain of being further swiped.

Are you prepared to be swiped further ?

The evidence and facts that have been offered in my last responses to your repeated post have also been posted by others in which I had also extracted and quoted in robbertteh's thread - ‘The Culture of Fear and Selfish Existence in our society’

If you cannot handle facts and evidences, it clearly confirms that you are no better than your own selected choice of nick at being 'Point_blank' - which explains for your blank efforts at giving any critical anaylysis to what has been offered.

Juveniles will always be juveniles, when they are sore - they simply vent their anger with acts of vandalism.

Try peeling through my response and give your ''point of view'' to the items that you are disputing - if you can penetrate your ''blank'' thoughts.

With your anticipated crap post that provided no evidence to back up your statements, you, Asswipe Atobe, had proven yourself nothing more than a piece of shit BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT. Out of respect for the owners of this site, I rest my case.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:48:14 +0800

Atobe — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:48:14 +0800

Originally posted by Point_blank:

Crap again? When will you ever learn. This gonna make you look bad:- repost

Talk all the crap you want. Use arrogance to cover up for your ignorance and perfidy. BUT SHOW ME THE EVIDENCES OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS. Afterall, you were the one who made these allegations. I repost incase you were blind, more clearly:-

What is parliament if MPs do not debate on an issue? And if debate is over, had not a concensus been obtained? Did any MP stood up and said otherwise? Are you so stupid you don't even realized this?

And you dare alleged "since when have you been able to appreciate the under-current dissatisfaction amongst the veteran MPs ?" - so you had been able to appreciate it. Can you name them, these so called veteran MPs whom you obtained such alleged information on THE MAS ISSUE and their statements or did you just finished some marijuana and envision it?

"Are our MPs already satisfied, or has the debate been stopped by the Parliamentary Speaker, and the Political Party Whip ?" - Are you alleging that they are less than honest and stop the debate? Can you back up such a statement, give names and statements of the MPs who had been stopped, over the Mas affair?

Or what are your true intentions- is it to create strife and mistrust - leading to anarchy in our society?

I am STILL awaiting for your claims. Show claims please.

Any?

Does it really make me look bad, or does it not reveal the 'Point_blank' side of you that is shown to be bankrupt of further words or hard 'points' to debunk all that have been said in my post ?

Do you think that this simplisic juvenile efforts at vandalising this thread can hope to help you score some desparate points in your 'Point_blank' score card ?

One can lead an ass to the water, but if the ass refuse to take a sip - can one swipe the ass to do so ?

Even if the ass refuse to drink, it will surely be made to carry the burden under pain of being further swiped.

Are you prepared to be swiped further ?

The evidence and facts that have been offered in my last responses to your repeated post have also been posted by others in which I had also extracted and quoted in robbertteh's thread - ‘The Culture of Fear and Selfish Existence in our society’

If you cannot handle facts and evidences, it clearly confirms that you are no better than your own selected choice of nick at being 'Point_blank' - which explains for your blank efforts at giving any critical anaylysis to what has been offered.

Juveniles will always be juveniles, when they are sore - they simply vent their anger with acts of vandalism.

Try peeling through my response and give your ''point of view'' to the items that you are disputing - if you can penetrate your ''blank'' thoughts.

Tantrums, tantrums, tantrums - if this is not blind rage that erupts from pure frustration at being constantly swiped.

You seem to be unhealthily hung up with events at the rear end - with ''asswipe and fart'' - as this exchange develop, has the gas delivered you to giddy heights ?

It is entertaining to read your bankrupt efforts in repeating your position each time when facts given are ignored by your poor reading ability, or simply by your bankrupt attempt at entertaining your ego by playing to the public in this Speakers' Corner.

Have I evade you, or have you preferred to ignore the evidence that I have managed to dig up ?

As have been repeated so often - can you handle evidence ?

Can you handle the TRUTH - or are you simply too dishonest to be genuine ?

All you can do is to ignore the details in my post, and make pompous remarks about the seriousness of unsubstantiated allegations, false accusations and your loads of useless imitation of the typical ''scare tactics'' to discourage further debate - as used so often by your God Father to avoid being having to admit his own failures.

alk all the crap you want. Use arrogance to cover up for your ignorance and perfidy. BUT SHOW ME THE EVIDENCES OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS. Afterall, you were the one who made these allegations. I repost incase you were blind, more clearly:-

Show you the evidences of the allegations ?

Can you handle the evidences in any logical manner with your bankrupt 'point_blank' approach in using and avoiding evidences that do not suit you ?

What is parliament if MPs do not debate on an issue? And if debate is over, had not a concensus been obtained? Did any MP stood up and said otherwise? Are you so stupid you don't even realized this?

Can the MIW MP continue to stand up and say otherwise ?

Or are you too stupid to believe that they can ?

And you dare alleged "since when have you been able to appreciate the under-current dissatisfaction amongst the veteran MPs ?" - so you had been able to appreciate it. Can you name them, these so called veteran MPs whom you obtained such alleged information on THE MAS ISSUE and their statements or did you just finished some marijuana and envision it?

How did you so brilliantly relate the veteran MPs to the debate in Parliament about the MAS issue ?

The named veteran MPs are all retired, which Parliament are they debating in ?

What MAS issue - Monetary Authority of Singapore; or MSK - Mas Selamat Kastari issue which is the current concern that the named veteran MPs in my recent posts in this Thread could not possibly have participated.

How did you brilliantly attempt to link my named veteran MPs to your own imagined issues to ''fix'' me ?

Do you think I am as sutpidly naive as you are - in making statements that have repeatedly lead you to a ''point-that-is-blank'' ?

"Are our MPs already satisfied, or has the debate been stopped by the Parliamentary Speaker, and the Political Party Whip ?" - Are you alleging that they are less than honest and stop the debate? Can you back up such a statement, give names and statements of the MPs who had been stopped, over the Mas affair?

Or what are your true intentions- is it to create strife and mistrust - leading to anarchy in our society?

I am truly amaze that despite all your seeming vulgar attitude towards my position, you seem to have a huge propensity of respect in my influence and ability in creating ''strife and mistrust..leading to anarchy in our society'' from this little Speakers' Corner ?

Or are you simply bankrupt of any further way to debate sensibly to all the counter-points in reply to your previous posts in this Thread - and that all you can do now is simply to reprint your posts again with some modification by adding the Fear Factor ?

Do you think that you can imitate MM LKY by simply plagiarising his style of silencing debate with warnings of ''dire consequences'' if strife and mistrust is the outcome of further debate ?

He is the only person who can interprete the word "consequences'' as having any threat value, as he is the only one that use this word directly as a warning of the ''dire consequences" to fall on anyone who will challenge his established nature of things.

I am STILL awaiting for your claims. Show claims please.

Any?

Why do you have to wait for the evidence when it has already been given in my last post on Page 4 of this Thread ?

The names of the Veteran MPs from the MIW Team were already given.

It was proven that Mr Tan Soo Koon - PAP backbencher had to give an apology to Parliament for speaking his mind honestly and ''offended'' his party leader - PM LHL.

Can you handle evidence ?

If you are too cheapskate, or as proven to be too ''point_blank" stupid to visit the Hansard records of Parliamentary debate - perhaps you may wish to peruse the following article from the New Paper

‘The New Paper: Will it be farewell for a few good men ?

THEY give voice to the masses, champion the underdogs, sometimes even step on powerful toes.

One even had to publicly apologise in 2002 for a careless comment he made about then-Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

Their contribution often begs the question: Who says Singapore politics and parliamentary proceedings are boring ?

If you raise your hand, you're obviously not sat through many hard-hitting speeches by several of the most hard-hitting backbenchers.

USUAL SUSPECTS

The usual names come to mind: Mr Tan Soo Khoon {East Coast GRC}, Dr Tan Cheng Bock {Ayer Rajah}, Dr Wong Kai Yuen {Bukit Timah}, Mr Charles Chong {Pasir Ris-PUnggol GRC}.

These are veteran MPs, "senior" in age and experience who were never picked for the Front Bench, but who have, over the years, built up a reputation for being vocal and passionate - both in and out of the House.

"The speak from the heart," ex-Nominated MP Chandra Mohan K Nair told The New Paper

This New Paper report confirm the event of Tan Soo Khoon speech of dissent made, and the apology that he had to give, as well as confirming the names of the other MPs who were outspoken towards Governmental Policies.

Yet, each and everyone of them had consistently voted to approve the Bills that they have been most vocally against.

Hansard Parliamentary records are there to be checked - unless you are simply 'Point_blank' stupid to know how to reach for it.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:12:43 +0800

Point_blank — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:12:43 +0800

Originally posted by Atobe:

Not only should you ROFLMAO - but RODFLMFAO - as your ass have been kicked so often that you surely need a long time to laughed it off on the floor.

So you managed to respond the medicine offered in my last post, and managed to retain some of your composure ?

How could you feel that I have insulted you, when all I did was to redirect your attention to your destructive juvenile ways with your vandlistic acts, your vulgarity and slow decline in depravity with your 'Point_blank' arguments as each 'point' has been proven to be constantly 'blank' ?

This response must surely be seen as a positive act from the positive effects of my counsel - unfortunately, juveniles are seldom grateful.

Do you seriously believe your own 'Point_blank' thoughts that you wish others to be stupid, or is it not your own deluded assumptions that everyone else are stupid enough and unable to discern anything posted, and require your supreme 'Point_blank' intelligence to guide them in the correct paths of your God Father ?

Are you capable enough to perform the thankless task without pulling on your own sensitive emotions and launch into a diatribe of vulgar insults that surely does not reflect the qualities of your God Father ?

It is best to keep your own blanks to your own points, and no one will be able to assess the shallow depths of those blanks.

Crap again? When will you ever learn. This gonna make you look bad:- repost

Talk all the crap you want. Use arrogance to cover up for your ignorance and perfidy. BUT SHOW ME THE EVIDENCES OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS. Afterall, you were the one who made these allegations. I repost incase you were blind, more clearly:-

What is parliament if MPs do not debate on an issue? And if debate is over, had not a concensus been obtained? Did any MP stood up and said otherwise? Are you so stupid you don't even realized this?

And you dare alleged "since when have you been able to appreciate the under-current dissatisfaction amongst the veteran MPs ?" - so you had been able to appreciate it. Can you name them, these so called veteran MPs whom you obtained such alleged information on THE MAS ISSUE and their statements or did you just finished some marijuana and envision it?

"Are our MPs already satisfied, or has the debate been stopped by the Parliamentary Speaker, and the Political Party Whip ?" - Are you alleging that they are less than honest and stop the debate? Can you back up such a statement, give names and statements of the MPs who had been stopped, over the Mas affair?

Or what are your true intentions- is it to create strife and mistrust - leading to anarchy in our society?

I am STILL awaiting for your claims. Show claims please.

Any?

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:10:31 +0800

Atobe — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:10:31 +0800

Originally posted by Point_blank:

Ha! Crap again, and you call me a sore loser? ROFLMAO! What an idiot you are, asswipe! You and your bunch of losers here can insult me all you want but others who are not fools reading the exchange will judge me accordingly. They aren't as stupid as you would like them to be, you know? lol!

Not only should you ROFLMAO - but RODFLMFAO - as your ass have been kicked so often that you surely need a long time to laughed it off on the floor.

So you managed to respond the medicine offered in my last post, and managed to retain some of your composure ?

How could you feel that I have insulted you, when all I did was to redirect your attention to your destructive juvenile ways with your vandlistic acts, your vulgarity and slow decline in depravity with your 'Point_blank' arguments as each 'point' has been proven to be constantly 'blank' ?

This response must surely be seen as a positive act from the positive effects of my counsel - unfortunately, juveniles are seldom grateful.

Do you seriously believe your own 'Point_blank' thoughts that you wish others to be stupid, or is it not your own deluded assumptions that everyone else are stupid enough and unable to discern anything posted, and require your supreme 'Point_blank' intelligence to guide them in the correct paths of your God Father ?

Are you capable enough to perform the thankless task without pulling on your own sensitive emotions and launch into a diatribe of vulgar insults that surely does not reflect the qualities of your God Father ?

It is best to keep your own blanks to your own points, and no one will be able to assess the shallow depths of those blanks.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:54:26 +0800

Point_blank — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:54:26 +0800

Originally posted by Atobe:

So the juvenile is prepared to read, but somehow cannot accept the medicine given.

Unfortunately, all you can offer is just words that dismiss what are facts that are offered as evidence.

It is not surprising that you are incapable of stating what is it in my facts offered as evidence that you cannot find acceptable - as you are here merely to post your 'Point_blank' opinions merely to drown out alternative views that are not so complimentary to your God Father.

If you think you are vicious and venomous by merely repeating your 'cut-and-paste' efforts, it merely shows the very juvinile vindictive side of a bankrupt 'Point_blank' person that you truly are in reality.

One can read the character of the person by simply reading the level of tolerance and thought process to be able to gauge the maturity and depth of the person in the manner arguments and words are presented.

What you have offered to-date has consistently been weak and open yourself to being debunked, as the original position that you have taken is indefensible, as you lack the wherewithall to achieve what you set up to do - imitate your God Father's ways.

Learn to walk, before you run like your God Father - he has been through alot more then you, why bother to imitate him when he is walking half-bent and you are probably walking in a more upright posture then him.

Juveniles will always be juvenile...so quick to idolise...so quick to imitate the idols,... and always intolerant towards wiser counsel... and forever a sore loser.

Ha! Crap again, and you call me a sore loser? ROFLMAO! What an idiot you are, asswipe! You and your bunch of losers here can insult me all you want but others who are not fools reading the exchange will judge me accordingly. They aren't as stupid as you would like them to be, you know? lol!

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:37:03 +0800

Atobe — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:37:03 +0800

Originally posted by Point_blank:

Hey Asswipe Atobe, are you blind? You call those as evidences to back up your insidious allegations? I wouldnt had bothered were they not serious. But you ask for it. I repost it again for, bag of farts!

Talk all the crap you want. Use arrogance to cover up for your ignorance and perfidy. BUT SHOW ME THE EVIDENCES OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS. Afterall, you were the one who made these allegations. I repost incase you were blind, more clearly:-

What is parliament if MPs do not debate on an issue? And if debate is over, had not a concensus been obtained? Did any MP stood up and said otherwise? Are you so stupid you don't even realized this?

And you dare alleged "since when have you been able to appreciate the under-current dissatisfaction amongst the veteran MPs ?" - so you had been able to appreciate it. Can you name them, these so called veteran MPs whom you obtained such alleged information on THE MAS ISSUE and their statements or did you just finished some marijuana and envision it?

"Are our MPs already satisfied, or has the debate been stopped by the Parliamentary Speaker, and the Political Party Whip ?" - Are you alleging that they are less than honest and stop the debate? Can you back up such a statement, give names and statements of the MPs who had been stopped, over the Mas affair?

Or what are your true intentions- is it to create strife and mistrust - leading to anarchy in our society?

I am STILL awaiting for your claims. Show claims please.

Any?

Continue to paste and post your trash, asswipe, i'm prepared to go the long haul to prove what you really are doing here - twisting words, giving malicious lies, half truths that does nothing else but to sow hatred and contempt for our society.

So the juvenile is prepared to read, but somehow cannot accept the medicine given.

Unfortunately, all you can offer is just words that dismiss what are facts that are offered as evidence.

It is not surprising that you are incapable of stating what is it in my facts offered as evidence that you cannot find acceptable - as you are here merely to post your 'Point_blank' opinions merely to drown out alternative views that are not so complimentary to your God Father.

If you think you are vicious and venomous by merely repeating your 'cut-and-paste' efforts, it merely shows the very juvinile vindictive side of a bankrupt 'Point_blank' person that you truly are in reality.

One can read the character of the person by simply reading the level of tolerance and thought process to be able to gauge the maturity and depth of the person in the manner arguments and words are presented.

What you have offered to-date has consistently been weak and open yourself to being debunked, as the original position that you have taken is indefensible, as you lack the wherewithall to achieve what you set up to do - imitate your God Father's ways.

Learn to walk, before you run like your God Father - he has been through alot more then you, why bother to imitate him when he is walking half-bent and you are probably walking in a more upright posture then him.

Juveniles will always be juvenile...so quick to idolise...so quick to imitate the idols,... and always intolerant towards wiser counsel... and forever a sore loser.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:24:31 +0800

Point_blank — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:24:31 +0800

Originally posted by Atobe:

Hahaha.. that will be the manner of your God Father in handling your reply.

If at all, your conduct is no better than CSJ's effort at banging his head on the wall, attempting to break the wall till some juice of your own preferred evidence will flow out, meanwhile, your God Father will simply put CSJ at arms length and maintain his own position handing out sufficient molass of evidence of his own choosing.

For one who pretend to imitate the workings of the God Father, all you can do is simply fall back on to vulgarities, insults, and debasing vocaubulary to express your personal vile and venom towards one who has surely got deep into your nerves and sensitivities.

It must surely tasted sour like vinegar your virginal mouth, which explains for the vileness that spew out in return.

Enough for starters, now for the real thing - did you finally decide to engage with some sensible thoughts instead of being exposed for juvenile vandalism in repeated paste and cut without any further points at rebuttal ?

The evidence were already given, in my twice repeated post that were underscored - did you not read through with some degree of diligence, or did the words missed your 'point_blank' gaze as your burn your eyes rapidly down each paragraph ?

For your sake, and that of the Speakers' Corner - I will not reprint my piece, as you can always refer to my piece in the last two replies.

Calm down, juvenile, or your pipe will burst and you will not be able to be here again for the entertainment of others and your ego.

Hey Asswipe Atobe, are you blind? You call those as evidences to back up your insidious allegations? I wouldnt had bothered were they not serious. But you ask for it. I repost it again for, bag of farts!

Or what are your true intentions- is it to create strife and mistrust - leading to anarchy in our society?

I am STILL awaiting for your claims. Show claims please.

Any?

Continue to paste and post your trash, asswipe, i'm prepared to go the long haul to prove what you really are doing here - twisting words, giving malicious lies, half truths that does nothing else but to sow hatred and contempt for our society.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:19:32 +0800

Atobe — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:19:32 +0800

Originally posted by Point_blank:

That's your best effort? LOL! Asswipe Atobe, YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCES AT ALL and yet brazenly continue on. You talk so much about credibility of others and YET, you offer nothing. You are not just hot air, but a bag of FART. This will be your reputation forever. Till you answer allegations you yourself made, word whore!

Hahaha.. that will be the manner of your God Father in handling your reply.

If at all, your conduct is no better than CSJ's effort at banging his head on the wall, attempting to break the wall till some juice of your own preferred evidence will flow out, meanwhile, your God Father will simply put CSJ at arms length and maintain his own position handing out sufficient molass of evidence of his own choosing.

For one who pretend to imitate the workings of the God Father, all you can do is simply fall back on to vulgarities, insults, and debasing vocaubulary to express your personal vile and venom towards one who has surely got deep into your nerves and sensitivities.

It must surely tasted sour like vinegar your virginal mouth, which explains for the vileness that spew out in return.

Enough for starters, now for the real thing - did you finally decide to engage with some sensible thoughts instead of being exposed for juvenile vandalism in repeated paste and cut without any further points at rebuttal ?

The evidence were already given, in my twice repeated post that were underscored - did you not read through with some degree of diligence, or did the words missed your 'point_blank' gaze as your burn your eyes rapidly down each paragraph ?

For your sake, and that of the Speakers' Corner - I will not reprint my piece, as you can always refer to my piece in the last two replies.

Calm down, juvenile, or your pipe will burst and you will not be able to be here again for the entertainment of others and your ego.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:56:58 +0800

Point_blank — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:56:58 +0800

Originally posted by Atobe:

You are quite a joke for the masochistic crowd.

Surely your constant efforts in simply cut and paste without any further efforts to reply is simply trying to occupy the pages to tire me out from further reply to your empty pieces so as to claim moral victory to your own position.

Unfortunately, your continued silence and meer repeating with cut-and-paste of your piece reveal the typical 'point_blank' thinking of a juvenile who has lost an argument and is merely behaving badly by vandalising the debate with your repeated posting without further comments.

Juvenile tantrums need to be handled with repeated drumming of the medicine that the juvenile refused to absorb.. here goes and try not to put on a sour face after going through the lot ....

That's your best effort? LOL! Asswipe Atobe, YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCES AT ALL and yet brazenly continue on. You talk so much about credibility of others and YET, you offer nothing. You are not just hot air, but a bag of FART. This will be your reputation forever. Till you answer allegations you yourself made, word whore!

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:46:56 +0800

Atobe — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:46:56 +0800

Originally posted by Point_blank:

You failed once again to read my post properly. Are you wilfully blind or just maliciously stupid? Look, you made the allegations, so you better supply the evidences, or you are nothing more than a bag of fart? Stop evading and giving crap answers. Who do you think you are fooling? I repost again.

Another asswiping long post, but STILL NO EVIDENCE OF YOUR CLAIMS. I repost again:-

Asswipe Atobe, YET AGAIN you EVADE giving full answers for the allegations you made. Why be so irresponsible and reprehensible? You Dare to ACCUSE and yet you do not SHOW EVIDENCE? Arent you just a bag of wind? If it had been harmless, no one would have minded. BUT you made SERIOUS allegations of our ELECTED representatives, now where is the proof? Are you just all FART?

Talk all the crap you want. Use arrogance to cover up for your ignorance and perfidy. BUT SHOW ME THE EVIDENCES OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS. Afterall, you were the one who made these allegations. I repost incase you were blind, more clearly:-

What is parliament if MPs do not debate on an issue? And if debate is over, had not a concensus been obtained? Did any MP stood up and said otherwise? Are you so stupid you don't even realized this?

And you dare alleged "since when have you been able to appreciate the under-current dissatisfaction amongst the veteran MPs ?" - so you had been able to appreciate it. Can you name them, these so called veteran MPs whom you obtained such alleged information on THE MAS ISSUE and their statements or did you just finished some marijuana and envision it?

"Are our MPs already satisfied, or has the debate been stopped by the Parliamentary Speaker, and the Political Party Whip ?" - Are you alleging that they are less than honest and stop the debate? Can you back up such a statement, give names and statements of the MPs who had been stopped, over the Mas affair?

Or what are your true intentions- is it to create strife and mistrust - leading to anarchy in our society?

I am STILL awaiting for your claims. Show claims please.

Any?

You are quite a joke for the masochistic crowd.

Surely your constant efforts in simply cut and paste without any further efforts to reply is simply trying to occupy the pages to tire me out from further reply to your empty pieces so as to claim moral victory to your own position.

Unfortunately, your continued silence and meer repeating with cut-and-paste of your piece reveal the typical 'point_blank' thinking of a juvenile who has lost an argument and is merely behaving badly by vandalising the debate with your repeated posting without further comments.

Juvenile tantrums need to be handled with repeated drumming of the medicine that the juvenile refused to absorb.. here goes and try not to put on a sour face after going through the lot ....

Tantrums, tantrums, tantrums - if this is not blind rage that erupts from pure frustration at being constantly swiped.

You seem to be unhealthily hung up with events at the rear end - with ''asswipe and fart'' - as this exchange develop, has the gas delivered you to giddy heights ?

It is entertaining to read your bankrupt efforts in repeating your position each time when facts given are ignored by your poor reading ability, or simply by your bankrupt attempt at entertaining your ego by playing to the public in this Speakers' Corner.

Have I evade you, or have you preferred to ignore the evidence that I have managed to dig up ?

As have been repeated so often - can you handle evidence ?

Can you handle the TRUTH - or are you simply too dishonest to be genuine ?

All you can do is to ignore the details in my post, and make pompous remarks about the seriousness of unsubstantiated allegations, false accusations and your loads of useless imitation of the typical ''scare tactics'' to discourage further debate - as used so often by your God Father to avoid being having to admit his own failures.

alk all the crap you want. Use arrogance to cover up for your ignorance and perfidy. BUT SHOW ME THE EVIDENCES OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS. Afterall, you were the one who made these allegations. I repost incase you were blind, more clearly:-

Show you the evidences of the allegations ?

Can you handle the evidences in any logical manner with your bankrupt 'point_blank' approach in using and avoiding evidences that do not suit you ?

What is parliament if MPs do not debate on an issue? And if debate is over, had not a concensus been obtained? Did any MP stood up and said otherwise? Are you so stupid you don't even realized this?

Can the MIW MP continue to stand up and say otherwise ?

Or are you too stupid to believe that they can ?

And you dare alleged "since when have you been able to appreciate the under-current dissatisfaction amongst the veteran MPs ?" - so you had been able to appreciate it. Can you name them, these so called veteran MPs whom you obtained such alleged information on THE MAS ISSUE and their statements or did you just finished some marijuana and envision it?

How did you so brilliantly relate the veteran MPs to the debate in Parliament about the MAS issue ?

The named veteran MPs are all retired, which Parliament are they debating in ?

What MAS issue - Monetary Authority of Singapore; or MSK - Mas Selamat Kastari issue which is the current concern that the named veteran MPs in my recent posts in this Thread could not possibly have participated.

How did you brilliantly attempt to link my named veteran MPs to your own imagined issues to ''fix'' me ?

Do you think I am as sutpidly naive as you are - in making statements that have repeatedly lead you to a ''point-that-is-blank'' ?

"Are our MPs already satisfied, or has the debate been stopped by the Parliamentary Speaker, and the Political Party Whip ?" - Are you alleging that they are less than honest and stop the debate? Can you back up such a statement, give names and statements of the MPs who had been stopped, over the Mas affair?

Or what are your true intentions- is it to create strife and mistrust - leading to anarchy in our society?

I am truly amaze that despite all your seeming vulgar attitude towards my position, you seem to have a huge propensity of respect in my influence and ability in creating ''strife and mistrust..leading to anarchy in our society'' from this little Speakers' Corner ?

Or are you simply bankrupt of any further way to debate sensibly to all the counter-points in reply to your previous posts in this Thread - and that all you can do now is simply to reprint your posts again with some modification by adding the Fear Factor ?

Do you think that you can imitate MM LKY by simply plagiarising his style of silencing debate with warnings of ''dire consequences'' if strife and mistrust is the outcome of further debate ?

He is the only person who can interprete the word "consequences'' as having any threat value, as he is the only one that use this word directly as a warning of the ''dire consequences" to fall on anyone who will challenge his established nature of things.

I am STILL awaiting for your claims. Show claims please.

Any?

Why do you have to wait for the evidence when it has already been given in my last post on Page 4 of this Thread ?

The names of the Veteran MPs from the MIW Team were already given.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:24:27 +0800

Point_blank — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:24:27 +0800

Originally posted by Atobe:

It seems that your 'Point_blank' dishonesty has surely reached stellar status - with your inability to produce anything more but to simply reject what has been offered as clear facts and evidences without even attempting to dispute them..

You are too juvenile to make any effort to read the Hansard records of Parliamentary proceedings to get the necessary evidence to rebut my position, AND PROVE YOURSELF right that the Parliamentary Speaker NEVER stop anyone from debating any Bills beyond the time bar ?

You cannot even show any evidence to prove me wrong that the remaining 82 MPs - that exclude the Cabinet members - has the option to vote according to their conscience and for the interest of their constituents more then the Party Policies.

Read again my posts, which has consistently given you the evidence, unless you are disputing the issues that I have raised.

Are you not following your God Father's way of repetitive lies, and hope that having done so repeatedly it will magically become the truth ?

Unfortunately, he is far more reputable in his self-created God Father's way than your proven ability at merely being ''Point_blank" puny.

Try harder if you believe you can fit your God Father's shoes, as your arse is on the line and have been swiped by me with sheer delight...

In response to your repeated attempts, this is my last post, where the evidence that you cry for did not register in your agitated puny brain:

Did you arrive to the bottom of this footnote ?

Thanks for reading, now do some ''Point_blank" thinking to reach beyond your ''blank_point" abilities - for your own hopeless sake .... Juvenile

You failed once again to read my post properly. Are you wilfully blind or just maliciously stupid? Look, you made the allegations, so you better supply the evidences, or you are nothing more than a bag of fart? Stop evading and giving crap answers. Who do you think you are fooling? I repost again.

Another asswiping long post, but STILL NO EVIDENCE OF YOUR CLAIMS. I repost again:-

Asswipe Atobe, YET AGAIN you EVADE giving full answers for the allegations you made. Why be so irresponsible and reprehensible? You Dare to ACCUSE and yet you do not SHOW EVIDENCE? Arent you just a bag of wind? If it had been harmless, no one would have minded. BUT you made SERIOUS allegations of our ELECTED representatives, now where is the proof? Are you just all FART?

Or what are your true intentions- is it to create strife and mistrust - leading to anarchy in our society?

I am STILL awaiting for your claims. Show claims please.

Any?

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:42:01 +0800

Atobe — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:42:01 +0800

Originally posted by Point_blank:

Another asswiping long post, but STILL NO EVIDENCE OF YOUR CLAIMS. I repost again:-

Asswipe Atobe, YET AGAIN you EVADE giving full answers for the allegations you made. Why be so irresponsible and reprehensible? You Dare to ACCUSE and yet you do not SHOW EVIDENCE? Arent you just a bag of wind? If it had been harmless, no one would have minded. BUT you made SERIOUS allegations of our ELECTED representatives, now where is the proof? Are you just all FART?

Talk all the crap you want. Use arrogance to cover up for your ignorance and perfidy. BUT SHOW ME THE EVIDENCES OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS. Afterall, you were the one who made these allegations. I repost incase you were blind, more clearly:-

What is parliament if MPs do not debate on an issue? And if debate is over, had not a concensus been obtained? Did any MP stood up and said otherwise? Are you so stupid you don't even realized this?

And you dare alleged "since when have you been able to appreciate the under-current dissatisfaction amongst the veteran MPs ?" - so you had been able to appreciate it. Can you name them, these so called veteran MPs whom you obtained such alleged information on THE MAS ISSUE and their statements or did you just finished some marijuana and envision it?

"Are our MPs already satisfied, or has the debate been stopped by the Parliamentary Speaker, and the Political Party Whip ?" - Are you alleging that they are less than honest and stop the debate? Can you back up such a statement, give names and statements of the MPs who had been stopped, over the Mas affair?

Or what are your true intentions- is it to create strife and mistrust - leading to anarchy in our society?

I am STILL awaiting for your claims. Show claims please.

Any?

It seems that your 'Point_blank' dishonesty has surely reached stellar status - with your inability to produce anything more but to simply reject what has been offered as clear facts and evidences without even attempting to dispute them..

You are too juvenile to make any effort to read the Hansard records of Parliamentary proceedings to get the necessary evidence to rebut my position, AND PROVE YOURSELF right that the Parliamentary Speaker NEVER stop anyone from debating any Bills beyond the time bar ?

You cannot even show any evidence to prove me wrong that the remaining 82 MPs - that exclude the Cabinet members - has the option to vote according to their conscience and for the interest of their constituents more then the Party Policies.

Read again my posts, which has consistently given you the evidence, unless you are disputing the issues that I have raised.

Are you not following your God Father's way of repetitive lies, and hope that having done so repeatedly it will magically become the truth ?

Unfortunately, he is far more reputable in his self-created God Father's way than your proven ability at merely being ''Point_blank" puny.

Try harder if you believe you can fit your God Father's shoes, as your arse is on the line and have been swiped by me with sheer delight...

In response to your repeated attempts, this is my last post, where the evidence that you cry for did not register in your agitated puny brain:

Tantrums, tantrums, tantrums - if this is not blind rage that erupts from pure frustration at being constantly swiped.

You seem to be unhealthily hung up with events at the rear end - with ''asswipe and fart'' - as this exchange develop, has the gas delivered you to giddy heights ?

It is entertaining to read your bankrupt efforts in repeating your position each time when facts given are ignored by your poor reading ability, or simply by your bankrupt attempt at entertaining your ego by playing to the public in this Speakers' Corner.

Have I evade you, or have you preferred to ignore the evidence that I have managed to dig up ?

As have been repeated so often - can you handle evidence ?

Can you handle the TRUTH - or are you simply too dishonest to be genuine ?

All you can do is to ignore the details in my post, and make pompous remarks about the seriousness of unsubstantiated allegations, false accusations and your loads of useless imitation of the typical ''scare tactics'' to discourage further debate - as used so often by your God Father to avoid being having to admit his own failures.

alk all the crap you want. Use arrogance to cover up for your ignorance and perfidy. BUT SHOW ME THE EVIDENCES OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS. Afterall, you were the one who made these allegations. I repost incase you were blind, more clearly:-

Show you the evidences of the allegations ?

Can you handle the evidences in any logical manner with your bankrupt 'point_blank' approach in using and avoiding evidences that do not suit you ?

What is parliament if MPs do not debate on an issue? And if debate is over, had not a concensus been obtained? Did any MP stood up and said otherwise? Are you so stupid you don't even realized this?

Can the MIW MP continue to stand up and say otherwise ?

Or are you too stupid to believe that they can ?

And you dare alleged "since when have you been able to appreciate the under-current dissatisfaction amongst the veteran MPs ?" - so you had been able to appreciate it. Can you name them, these so called veteran MPs whom you obtained such alleged information on THE MAS ISSUE and their statements or did you just finished some marijuana and envision it?

How did you so brilliantly relate the veteran MPs to the debate in Parliament about the MAS issue ?

The named veteran MPs are all retired, which Parliament are they debating in ?

What MAS issue - Monetary Authority of Singapore; or MSK - Mas Selamat Kastari issue which is the current concern that the named veteran MPs in my recent posts in this Thread could not possibly have participated.

How did you brilliantly attempt to link my named veteran MPs to your own imagined issues to ''fix'' me ?

Do you think I am as sutpidly naive as you are - in making statements that have repeatedly lead you to a ''point-that-is-blank'' ?

"Are our MPs already satisfied, or has the debate been stopped by the Parliamentary Speaker, and the Political Party Whip ?" - Are you alleging that they are less than honest and stop the debate? Can you back up such a statement, give names and statements of the MPs who had been stopped, over the Mas affair?

Or what are your true intentions- is it to create strife and mistrust - leading to anarchy in our society?

I am truly amaze that despite all your seeming vulgar attitude towards my position, you seem to have a huge propensity of respect in my influence and ability in creating ''strife and mistrust..leading to anarchy in our society'' from this little Speakers' Corner ?

Or are you simply bankrupt of any further way to debate sensibly to all the counter-points in reply to your previous posts in this Thread - and that all you can do now is simply to reprint your posts again with some modification by adding the Fear Factor ?

Do you think that you can imitate MM LKY by simply plagiarising his style of silencing debate with warnings of ''dire consequences'' if strife and mistrust is the outcome of further debate ?

He is the only person who can interprete the word "consequences'' as having any threat value, as he is the only one that use this word directly as a warning of the ''dire consequences" to fall on anyone who will challenge his established nature of things.

I am STILL awaiting for your claims. Show claims please.

Any?

Why do you have to wait for the evidence when it has already been given in my last post on Page 4 of this Thread ?

The names of the Veteran MPs from the MIW Team were already given.

It was proven that Mr Tan Soo Koon - PAP backbencher had to give an apology to Parliament for speaking his mind honestly and ''offended'' his party leader - PM LHL.

Can you handle evidence ?

If you are too cheapskate, or as proven to be too ''point_blank" stupid to visit the Hansard records of Parliamentary debate - perhaps you may wish to peruse the following article from the New Paper

‘The New Paper: Will it be farewell for a few good men ?

THEY give voice to the masses, champion the underdogs, sometimes even step on powerful toes.

One even had to publicly apologise in 2002 for a careless comment he made about then-Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

Their contribution often begs the question: Who says Singapore politics and parliamentary proceedings are boring ?

If you raise your hand, you're obviously not sat through many hard-hitting speeches by several of the most hard-hitting backbenchers.

USUAL SUSPECTS

The usual names come to mind: Mr Tan Soo Khoon {East Coast GRC}, Dr Tan Cheng Bock {Ayer Rajah}, Dr Wong Kai Yuen {Bukit Timah}, Mr Charles Chong {Pasir Ris-PUnggol GRC}.

These are veteran MPs, "senior" in age and experience who were never picked for the Front Bench, but who have, over the years, built up a reputation for being vocal and passionate - both in and out of the House.

"The speak from the heart," ex-Nominated MP Chandra Mohan K Nair told The New Paper

This New Paper report confirm the event of Tan Soo Khoon speech of dissent made, and the apology that he had to give, as well as confirming the names of the other MPs who were outspoken towards Governmental Policies.

Yet, each and everyone of them had consistently voted to approve the Bills that they have been most vocally against.

Hansard Parliamentary records are there to be checked - unless you are simply 'Point_blank' stupid to know how to reach for it.

Did you arrive to the bottom of this footnote ?

Thanks for reading, now do some ''Point_blank" thinking to reach beyond your ''blank_point" abilities - for your own hopeless sake .... Juvenile

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:30:34 +0800

Point_blank — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:30:34 +0800

Originally posted by Atobe:

Tantrums, tantrums, tantrums - if this is not blind rage that erupts from pure frustration at being constantly swiped.

You seem to be unhealthily hung up with events at the rear end - with ''asswipe and fart'' - as this exchange develop, has the gas delivered you to giddy heights ?

It is entertaining to read your bankrupt efforts in repeating your position each time when facts given are ignored by your poor reading ability, or simply by your bankrupt attempt at entertaining your ego by playing to the public in this Speakers' Corner.

Have I evade you, or have you preferred to ignore the evidence that I have managed to dig up ?

As have been repeated so often - can you handle evidence ?

Can you handle the TRUTH - or are you simply too dishonest to be genuine ?

All you can do is to ignore the details in my post, and make pompous remarks about the seriousness of unsubstantiated allegations, false accusations and your loads of useless imitation of the typical ''scare tactics'' to discourage further debate - as used so often by your God Father to avoid being having to admit his own failures.

Show you the evidences of the allegations ?

Can you handle the evidences in any logical manner with your bankrupt 'point_blank' approach in using and avoiding evidences that do not suit you ?

Can the MIW MP continue to stand up and say otherwise ?

Or are you too stupid to believe that they can ?

How did you so brilliantly relate the veteran MPs to the debate in Parliament about the MAS issue ?

The named veteran MPs are all retired, which Parliament are they debating in ?

What MAS issue - Monetary Authority of Singapore; or MSK - Mas Selamat Kastari issue which is the current concern that the named veteran MPs in my recent posts in this Thread could not possibly have participated.

How did you brilliantly attempt to link my named veteran MPs to your own imagined issues to ''fix'' me ?

Do you think I am as sutpidly naive as you are - in making statements that have repeatedly lead you to a ''point-that-is-blank'' ?

I am truly amaze that despite all your seeming vulgar attitude towards my position, you seem to have a huge propensity of respect in my influence and ability in creating ''strife and mistrust..leading to anarchy in our society'' from this little Speakers' Corner ?

Or are you simply bankrupt of any further way to debate sensibly to all the counter-points in reply to your previous posts in this Thread - and that all you can do now is simply to reprint your posts again with some modification by adding the Fear Factor ?

Do you think that you can imitate MM LKY by simply plagiarising his style of silencing debate with warnings of ''dire consequences'' if strife and mistrust is the outcome of further debate ?

He is the only person who can interprete the word "consequences'' as having any threat value, as he is the only one that use this word directly as a warning of the ''dire consequences" to fall on anyone who will challenge his established nature of things.

Why do you have to wait for the evidence when it has already been given in my last post on Page 4 of this Thread ?

The names of the Veteran MPs from the MIW Team were already given.

It was proven that Mr Tan Soo Koon - PAP backbencher had to give an apology to Parliament for speaking his mind honestly and ''offended'' his party leader - PM LHL.

Can you handle evidence ?

If you are too cheapskate, or as proven to be too ''point_blank" stupid to visit the Hansard records of Parliamentary debate - perhaps you may wish to peruse the following article from the New Paper

This New Paper report confirm the event of Tan Soo Khoon speech of dissent made, and the apology that he had to give, as well as confirming the names of the other MPs who were outspoken towards Governmental Policies.

Yet, each and everyone of them had consistently voted to approve the Bills that they have been most vocally against.

Hansard Parliamentary records are there to be checked - unless you are simply 'Point_blank' stupid to know how to reach for it.

Another asswiping long post, but STILL NO EVIDENCE OF YOUR CLAIMS. I repost again:-

Or what are your true intentions- is it to create strife and mistrust - leading to anarchy in our society?

I am STILL awaiting for your claims. Show claims please.

Any?

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:30:40 +0800

Atobe — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:30:40 +0800

Originally posted by Point_blank:<

Asswipe Atobe, YET AGAIN you EVADE giving full answers for the allegations you made. Why be so irresponsible and reprehensible? You Dare to ACCUSE and yet you do not SHOW EVIDENCE? Arent you just a bag of wind? If it had been harmless, no one would have minded. BUT you made SERIOUS allegations of our ELECTED representatives, now where is the proof? Are you just all FART?

Tantrums, tantrums, tantrums - if this is not blind rage that erupts from pure frustration at being constantly swiped.

You seem to be unhealthily hung up with events at the rear end - with ''asswipe and fart'' - as this exchange develop, has the gas delivered you to giddy heights ?

It is entertaining to read your bankrupt efforts in repeating your position each time when facts given are ignored by your poor reading ability, or simply by your bankrupt attempt at entertaining your ego by playing to the public in this Speakers' Corner.

Have I evade you, or have you preferred to ignore the evidence that I have managed to dig up ?

As have been repeated so often - can you handle evidence ?

Can you handle the TRUTH - or are you simply too dishonest to be genuine ?

All you can do is to ignore the details in my post, and make pompous remarks about the seriousness of unsubstantiated allegations, false accusations and your loads of useless imitation of the typical ''scare tactics'' to discourage further debate - as used so often by your God Father to avoid being having to admit his own failures.

alk all the crap you want. Use arrogance to cover up for your ignorance and perfidy. BUT SHOW ME THE EVIDENCES OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS. Afterall, you were the one who made these allegations. I repost incase you were blind, more clearly:-

Show you the evidences of the allegations ?

Can you handle the evidences in any logical manner with your bankrupt 'point_blank' approach in using and avoiding evidences that do not suit you ?

What is parliament if MPs do not debate on an issue? And if debate is over, had not a concensus been obtained? Did any MP stood up and said otherwise? Are you so stupid you don't even realized this?

Can the MIW MP continue to stand up and say otherwise ?

Or are you too stupid to believe that they can ?

And you dare alleged "since when have you been able to appreciate the under-current dissatisfaction amongst the veteran MPs ?" - so you had been able to appreciate it. Can you name them, these so called veteran MPs whom you obtained such alleged information on THE MAS ISSUE and their statements or did you just finished some marijuana and envision it?

How did you so brilliantly relate the veteran MPs to the debate in Parliament about the MAS issue ?

The named veteran MPs are all retired, which Parliament are they debating in ?

What MAS issue - Monetary Authority of Singapore; or MSK - Mas Selamat Kastari issue which is the current concern that the named veteran MPs in my recent posts in this Thread could not possibly have participated.

How did you brilliantly attempt to link my named veteran MPs to your own imagined issues to ''fix'' me ?

Do you think I am as sutpidly naive as you are - in making statements that have repeatedly lead you to a ''point-that-is-blank'' ?

"Are our MPs already satisfied, or has the debate been stopped by the Parliamentary Speaker, and the Political Party Whip ?" - Are you alleging that they are less than honest and stop the debate? Can you back up such a statement, give names and statements of the MPs who had been stopped, over the Mas affair?

Or what are your true intentions- is it to create strife and mistrust - leading to anarchy in our society?

I am truly amaze that despite all your seeming vulgar attitude towards my position, you seem to have a huge propensity of respect in my influence and ability in creating ''strife and mistrust..leading to anarchy in our society'' from this little Speakers' Corner ?

Or are you simply bankrupt of any further way to debate sensibly to all the counter-points in reply to your previous posts in this Thread - and that all you can do now is simply to reprint your posts again with some modification by adding the Fear Factor ?

Do you think that you can imitate MM LKY by simply plagiarising his style of silencing debate with warnings of ''dire consequences'' if strife and mistrust is the outcome of further debate ?

He is the only person who can interprete the word "consequences'' as having any threat value, as he is the only one that use this word directly as a warning of the ''dire consequences" to fall on anyone who will challenge his established nature of things.

I am STILL awaiting for your claims. Show claims please.

Any?

Why do you have to wait for the evidence when it has already been given in my last post on Page 4 of this Thread ?

The names of the Veteran MPs from the MIW Team were already given.

It was proven that Mr Tan Soo Koon - PAP backbencher had to give an apology to Parliament for speaking his mind honestly and ''offended'' his party leader - PM LHL.

Can you handle evidence ?

If you are too cheapskate, or as proven to be too ''point_blank" stupid to visit the Hansard records of Parliamentary debate - perhaps you may wish to peruse the following article from the New Paper

‘The New Paper: Will it be farewell for a few good men ?

THEY give voice to the masses, champion the underdogs, sometimes even step on powerful toes.

One even had to publicly apologise in 2002 for a careless comment he made about then-Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

Their contribution often begs the question: Who says Singapore politics and parliamentary proceedings are boring ?

If you raise your hand, you're obviously not sat through many hard-hitting speeches by several of the most hard-hitting backbenchers.

USUAL SUSPECTS

The usual names come to mind: Mr Tan Soo Khoon {East Coast GRC}, Dr Tan Cheng Bock {Ayer Rajah}, Dr Wong Kai Yuen {Bukit Timah}, Mr Charles Chong {Pasir Ris-PUnggol GRC}.

These are veteran MPs, "senior" in age and experience who were never picked for the Front Bench, but who have, over the years, built up a reputation for being vocal and passionate - both in and out of the House.

"The speak from the heart," ex-Nominated MP Chandra Mohan K Nair told The New Paper

This New Paper report confirm the event of Tan Soo Khoon speech of dissent made, and the apology that he had to give, as well as confirming the names of the other MPs who were outspoken towards Governmental Policies.

Yet, each and everyone of them had consistently voted to approve the Bills that they have been most vocally against.

Hansard Parliamentary records are there to be checked - unless you are simply 'Point_blank' stupid to know how to reach for it.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by eagle @ Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:24:11 +0800

eagle — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:24:11 +0800

Originally posted by maurizio13:

He's the P4P's homologous of CSJ?

A black sheep amongst the white sheeps.

There must be a reason why they know CSJ (as said by LHL)

知己知彼, 百战百胜

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by charlize @ Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:22:22 +0800

charlize — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:22:22 +0800

Originally posted by maurizio13:

Who?

Do tell.

No point lah.

Wait he bombard me with his nonsense.

I don't have so much time replying to him.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by maurizio13 @ Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:20:26 +0800

maurizio13 — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:20:26 +0800

Originally posted by eagle:

CSJ lor

He's the P4P's homologous of CSJ?

A black sheep amongst the white sheeps.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by eagle @ Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:17:09 +0800

eagle — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:17:09 +0800

Originally posted by maurizio13:

Who?

Do tell.

CSJ lor

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by maurizio13 @ Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:16:55 +0800

maurizio13 — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:16:55 +0800

Originally posted by oxford mushroom:

Do you have the balls to identify yourself and repeat that? Would you dare defend your statement in court? Oops...you have no balls, no guts and no brain :)

How come you throw in the towel so early this time?

Resorting to threats and name calling before you even start arguing your facts of the case.

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by maurizio13 @ Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:12:15 +0800

maurizio13 — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:12:15 +0800

Originally posted by charlize:

Point blank is starting to behave and sound like a particular opposition member.

The irony of it all.

Who?

Do tell.

Recent Posts in 'what is wrong with catherine lim?' | sgForums.com

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:41:19 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by kiekergaard @ Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:15:39 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:59:04 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by lotus999 @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:20:42 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by redDUST @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:57:00 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:26:52 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:48:14 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:12:43 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:10:31 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:54:26 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:37:03 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:24:31 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:19:32 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:56:58 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:46:56 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:24:27 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:42:01 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Point_blank @ Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:30:34 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by Atobe @ Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:30:40 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by eagle @ Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:24:11 +0800

知己知彼, 百战百胜

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by charlize @ Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:22:22 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by maurizio13 @ Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:20:26 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by eagle @ Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:17:09 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by maurizio13 @ Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:16:55 +0800

what is wrong with catherine lim? replied by maurizio13 @ Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:12:15 +0800