LKY? TOC: Character Assasination
-
Dear All
Not sure if permission needs to be obtained for posting the article here. Please go to the link below to read about it.
http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/06/character-assassination-of-the-most-uncharitable-kind/
-
Sorry, in my rush I have spelt wrongly, correct spelling should be assassination.
-
Character assassination of the most uncharitable kind
Anthony Yeo, Consultant Therapist at the Counselling and Care Centre, wrote the following letter to the Straits Times political editor, Chua Lee Hoong.
Morning Chua Lee Hoong,
I cannot deny how appalled I was reading your article on Chee Soon Juan (ST June 7).
It appears to be an unwarranted scathing attempt at character assassination of the most uncharitable kind.
This attack culminated in your amateurish attempt at offering a diagnosis of his personality that is flawed in all ways as a diagnosis of personality disorder requires a fuller expose of that which constitutes a disorder.
MM Lee Kuan Yew decided to engage in such denigration of Chee Soon Juan on more than one occasion. His name calling of him as being a psychopath reflects his ignorance as to what a psychopath is.In any case, such labelling with psychological nomenclature merely exposes his truncated understanding of what a psychopath is, of which Chee does not in any way qualify.
This goes for you as well in your rather denigrating, demeaning and dismissive description of Chee.
You have chosen to highlight whatever you consider to be flaws in his approach and even worse, his character.
And yet, those of us who know him and have worked in some ways with him know otherwise.
I do wonder if you would do yourself, and the public for whom you wrote that article, a favour by embarking on a careful research of everything else he stands for and all that he has been doing without fanfare and publicity. And having done that, would you then have the integrity to offer another perspective of him, another “truth”, that you have so carefully sought to present in your article.
I would have thought there could be a little more charity in commenting on Chee rather than indulge in augmenting the already prejudicial opinions of this man.
One would have thought that any person regardless of what he does deserves respect and regard for human worth and dignity.
In any case, if you do wish to be better acquainted with what would present as an anti-social disorder, I would gladly assist on the basis of my more than 36 years of psychological work with disturbed people.
Anthony Yeo
Consultant Therapist
Counselling and Care Centrehttp://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/06/character-assassination-of-the-most-uncharitable-kind/
-
Chua Lee Hoong, why do you even bother?
Written by Ng E-Jay
08 June 2008Although I have been a contributor to the Straits Times Forum page now and then, I know full well that it is a well-oiled propaganda machine designed to support the establishment and spin the yarn of the PAP Government.
Throughout the entire hearing of PM Lee’s and MM Lee’s defamation suit against SDP leaders Dr Chee Soon Juan and his sister Ms Chee Siok Chin, the Straits Times has been telling the story in a one-sided fashion, demonizing the Chee siblings as inept trouble-makers out to create a political theatre out of a court case and peppering the court proceedings with irrelevant questions, questionable antics, even outright lies.
I would like to remind readers of what Lee Kuan Yew said in 1956 as part of the Legislative Assembly debates:
“Repression, Sir is a habit that grows. I am told it is like making love - it is always easier the second time! The first time there may be pangs of conscience, a sense of guilt. But once embarked on this course with constant repetition you get more and more brazen in the attack. All you have to do is to dissolve organizations and societies and banish and detain the key political workers in these societies. Then miraculously everything is tranquil on the surface. Then an intimidated press and the government-controlled radio together can regularly sing your praises, and slowly and steadily the people are made to forget the evil things that have already been done, or if these things are referred to again they’re conveniently distorted and distorted with impunity, because there will be no opposition to contradict.” - Lee Kuan Yew as an opposition PAP member speaking to David Marshall, Singapore Legislative Assembly Debates, 4 October 1956
Today, we see this philosophy enacted in full by the Straits Times, which published an article in the Insight page written by ex-ISD officer and current Political Editor Ms Chua Lee Hoong on Saturday 07 June 2008. This article, which puts the finishing touches on a long and disgusting propaganda campaign against Dr Chee Soon Juan, was published at a time when Dr Chee is in prison and is unable to respond directly to her.
“… or if these things are referred to again they’re conveniently distorted and distorted with impunity, because there will be no opposition to contradict …”
No opposition to contradict, because the person is in jail!
Entitled “The squandered potential of Chee Soon Juan”, Chua Lee Hoong puts together such a splendidly craftily summary of the entire propaganda attack on Dr Chee Soon Juan and the SDP that it does not leave any doubt in my mind the true intentions of our state-controlled media in fixing the Opposition.
Chua Lee Hoong begins by saying Dr Chee created a stir when he first entered politics in 1992, drawing high praise from even the then-leader of the SDP, Mr Chiam See Tong. Then the niceties stop abruptly. She goes on to question rhetorically, “What has happened in the 16 years hence? Today, one cannot help but conclude that the trailblazer is more a sputtering meteor, and perhaps one with an antisocial personality disorder.”
Apparently, Ms Chua now wants to be a psychiatrist as well. Perhaps she aspires to be the “doctor” who allegedly told MM Lee that Dr Chee was “near psychopath”.
Chua Lee Hoong says the SDP of today is “hardly credible as an opposition party”.
So how does Chua Lee Hoong argue her case that SDP is not credible? She states that during the 3-day court hearing to assess damages in the defamation suit brought on by PM Lee and MM Lee, the public gallery was invariably full, whilst SDP supporters numbered at most 15 or so.
I say Chua Lee Hoong is hardly credible herself. Does she not recall that on the first day of the court hearing, it was announced in the state media, in particular the New Paper, that PAP grassroots members went down by the busloads to show their support for the Lees? I am amazed that the PAP can be considered to render other opposition parties less credible by merely pulling on their vast machinery and bringing out huge numbers in force.
And who is to say SDP did not have silent supporters in the gallery, who followed the proceedings without publicly showing where their hearts were leaning toward?
Chua Lee Hoong then goes on to say that the SDP argument that the ruling party has used all means at its disposal to suppress it cuts “no ice with the majority of Singaporeans”, citing Mr Chiam See Tong and Mr Low Thia Khiang as examples of Opposition politicians who have succeeded despite the odds.
My question: Succeeded in what sense? In the sense of just holding on to their single seat in Parliament? Or in the sense of building a more credible Opposition that can stand up to the PAP and provide a sound challenge to its power base?
How about the alternative explanation that the PAP has held back from destroying Mr Chiam and Mr Low, for whatever reason, but has chosen not to pull its punches when it comes to Dr Chee, for the simple reason that Dr Chee, if left unchecked, will provide a far more forceful and comprehensive challenge to the system? I will let my readers decide for themselves on this one, as I’m sure most already know where I stand.
Chua Lee Hoong claims that Dr Chee has “disappointed an entire generation of voters” with acts that include misuse of university funds, a hunger strike that included the intake of glucose, the ouster of Mr Chiam from SDP, and the so-called heckling of then-PM Goh Chok Tong near a Jurong hawker centre in 2001.
Look Ms Chua, I know you are trying your darnest to bring down that man, but do you really believe that thinking people will buy into this old refrain any longer? For one, Mr Chiam was not ousted from SDP by Dr Chee. He voluntarily engineered his own exit, contrary to what the state media would have us believe.
Dr Chee’s question to Goh Chok Tong, “Where is the money”, remains valid even till today, as Singaporeans are forced to helplessly watch as the nation’s reserve are funnelled into dubious foreign investments whilst their CPF is still earning a very low interest rate and they are forced to take up schemes such as CPF Life because the national pension system can no longer adequately take care of their retirement needs.
On the heckling of then-PM Goh, our dearest Ms Chua sobs that “It was my misfortune to have witnessed the incident with my own eyes.” Oh, poor thing, that is so sad! Another “Poor me! I’m a victim” mentality, so it seems — exactly the same thing she has accused SDP of having.
But Ms Chua is not done yet. She goes on to mention the International Bar Association (IBA) conference held in Suntec City in 2006 in which Ms Sylvia Lim distanced herself from Dr Chee by siding with the establishment in implying that our laws are fair and just, and saying that “Singaporeans are quite capable of deciding for themselves the kind of country they want and did not need foreigners to canvass our agenda for us … … Singapore is not perfect, and we don’t pretend that it is. But neither should we make it out to be worse than it really is.”
In a country where basic civil rights such as the freedom of speech and assembly are regularly denied, it is astounding how Sylvia Lim could have come up with such a blatantly one-sided comment. Yet our dearest Chua Lee Hoong spares no effort in putting Sylvia Lim on a pedestal so as to make Dr Chee look small in comparison.
So was that the end of her tirade? Fat hope. What came after this makes the previous parts of Ms Chua’s article pale in comparison.
Chua Lee Hoong said that last Monday (02 June 2008), it was JBJ’s turn to distance himself from Dr Chee. She quoted JBJ as saying, ” the counsel doesn’t have to agree with whatever has been done by the client.”
In the first place, that was blatantly taken out of context. JBJ’s main concern at that time was that he did not sufficient time to prepare the appeal for Dr Chee (against his contempt-of-court conviction) as the court had given them too short a notice. Mr Jeyaretnam, counsel for Dr Chee, had made two preliminary applications: one for Judge Ang to recuse herself from the matter, and the second for more time to study the facts of the case as he had only received the Judge’s citations only during the weekend. Both applications were rejected. Dr Chee accordingly discharged Mr Jeyaretnam as counsel and said that he would not be defending the charges.
And to top the icing on the cake, our dearest Ms Chua drags out Dr Chee’s Christian faith and unceremoniously questions whether “Christians will accept his pattern of behaviour as being particularly Christian”.
I wonder if any Christians are actually offended by the dragging of their faith into what is undoubtedly a political discussion, and a horribly lop-sided one at that.
As for our dear Ms Chua’s remarks that Dr Chee could be suffering from antisocial personality disorder (APD), even going to the extent of saying “if he does, we have got to feel sorry for him”, the tragic irony of her audacious claim is that people suffering from APD have a lack of regard for the rights of others, which is precisely what Dr Chee has been fighting for on behalf of all Singaporeans.
Let me say this, even if Dr Chee is indeed suffering from APD, our dearest Ms Chua need not feel sorry for him. I would feel sorry for her instead, for her shameless engagement in gutter journalism, for her putting up such a shoddy and lame attempt at finishing Dr Chee off.
Chua Lee Hoong has made absolutely no effort at hiding the true intentions of the state media which she works for. One propaganda piece after another, each one distorting the facts with greater and greater impunity, leaves me no doubt that Ms Chua and her state media are obsessed with putting the man down at all cost, even at the risk of destroying whatever credibility they have left (if any).
At the end of the day, Ms Chua cannot even put together a coherent piece that is even remotely rational.
Ms Chua Lee Hoong, why do you even bother to try?
-
Chua Lee Hoong cannot be considered a journalist.
A better term to describe her is state propagandist.
Her job is simply to sing praises of state, propagate state propaganda and defend state policies and actions and also attack, criticise and denounce Singapore opposition parties or any critics of the state.
Bare this in mind, next time you read state times.
-
is she practising journalism at all. She sounds more like a spokesperson for lky and leegime.
I have more than once read her articles and find her a "one track mind" person. Credibility of this woman is zero.
-
seriously, CSJ doesn't need help to disgrace himself.. he's doing a mighty good job with his idiot sister
-
Originally posted by the Bear:
seriously, CSJ doesn't need help to disgrace himself.. he's doing a mighty good job with his idiot sister
Seriously, you will be more credible if you can explain for your diligent overtime work to drive deep piles of lies that are twisted and loudly published with such authority - when you have stated with such serious conviction that - "CSJ doesn't need help to disgrace himself''.If he does not need any help, why do you even bother to risk your unsolicited and bias derogatory comments about CSJ, and get yourself tarred for your wicked devotion to run down a fallen person ?
Are you bitten by the same bug that made CSJ an 'attention seeking whore' - by seeking attention for your whoring ways as a dishonest political commentator ?
This surely speaks alot about you - who will identify yourself closer to a carnivore then the sensitivity of any Human Being with reason.
Even if you cannot side with CSJ or his cause, there is no reason for you to trample a fallen person deeper into the rut that he got himself into.
-
Originally posted by the Bear:
seriously, CSJ doesn't need help to disgrace himself.. he's doing a mighty good job with his idiot sister
Another rubbish that you wrote. Heck somebody give this man an award for rubbish content. So that he can start writing and most importantly thinking and judging well.
I think somebody has been doing the thinking for him for way tooo long. His bucket is full of rubbish.
-
Originally posted by the Bear:
seriously, CSJ doesn't need help to disgrace himself.. he's doing a mighty good job with his idiot sister
Mr Chua..is that you? lol.. juz kidding.. xD
-
Originally posted by Atobe:
Seriously, you will be more credible if you can explain for your diligent overtime work to drive deep piles of lies that are twisted and loudly published with such authority - when you have stated with such serious conviction that - "CSJ doesn't need help to disgrace himself''.If he does not need any help, why do you even bother to risk your unsolicited and bias derogatory comments about CSJ, and get yourself tarred for your wicked devotion to run down a fallen person ?
Are you bitten by the same bug that made CSJ an 'attention seeking whore' - by seeking attention for your whoring ways as a dishonest political commentator ?
This surely speaks alot about you - who will identify yourself closer to a carnivore then the sensitivity of any Human Being with reason.
Even if you cannot side with CSJ or his cause, there is no reason for you to trample a fallen person deeper into the rut that he got himself into.
"CSJ doesn't need help to disgrace himself''.Thanks for your diligent overtime work to prove it here.
"why risk your unsolicited and bias derogatory comments about CSJ, and get yourself tarred for your wicked devotion to run down a fallen person ?"
Aren't you equally doing to the same? but this time you done well and rightly too.
"Are you bitten by the same bug that made CSJ an 'attention seeking whore' - by seeking attention for (his) whoring ways as a dishonest political commentator ?"
At least you were honest to admit CSJ as what he really is.
"This surely speaks alot about you - who will identify yourself closer to a carnivore then the sensitivity of any Human Being with reason."
No, i will say you are no carnivore, just speaking your mind honestly and finally on what you really think CSJ is.
"Even if you cannot side with CSJ or his cause, there is no reason for you to trample a fallen person deeper into the rut that he got himself into."
You trampled CSJ well. I applaud you. Just telling it as it is. Well done. In your own words too.
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
"CSJ doesn't need help to disgrace himself''.Thanks for your diligent overtime work to prove it here.
"why risk your unsolicited and bias derogatory comments about CSJ, and get yourself tarred for your wicked devotion to run down a fallen person ?"
Aren't you equally doing to the same? but this time you done well and rightly too.
"Are you bitten by the same bug that made CSJ an 'attention seeking whore' - by seeking attention for (his) whoring ways as a dishonest political commentator ?"
At least you were honest to admit CSJ as what he really is.
"This surely speaks alot about you - who will identify yourself closer to a carnivore then the sensitivity of any Human Being with reason."
No, i will say you are no carnivore, just speaking your mind honestly and finally on what you really think CSJ is.
"Even if you cannot side with CSJ or his cause, there is no reason for you to trample a fallen person deeper into the rut that he got himself into."
You trampled CSJ well. I applaud you. Just telling it as it is. Well done. In your own words too.
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Your way is to challenge viewpoints is by dissecting it into little parts in the hope of catching errors.
-
You know Deer, you can just use the quotes properly as they were ment to be used, instead of your confusing way of doublequoting that makes your post difficult to read.
Communication skills: fail sia...
-
Hmmm guys, do you think Gazelle needs acting lessons? Even when he tries to act rational he's not doing a very good job at it...
-
Originally posted by SingaporeTyrannosaur:
Hmmm guys, do you think Gazelle needs acting lessons? Even when he tries to act rational he's not doing a very good job at it...
Just send shim to IMH. -
Originally posted by SingaporeTyrannosaur:
Hmmm guys, do you think Gazelle needs acting lessons? Even when he tries to act rational he's not doing a very good job at it...
should post your sock puppet definition out also -
Originally posted by Miracles&Prophecies:
Another rubbish that you wrote. Heck somebody give this man an award for rubbish content. So that he can start writing and most importantly thinking and judging well.
I think somebody has been doing the thinking for him for way tooo long. His bucket is full of rubbish.
Give him award for slamming and self righteous, too. His condescending attitude really puts people off.
-
oh.. back to the topic..
about CSJ?
just ask CST.. the man he backstabbed
just look at SDP.. the party he destroyed..
dig a little?
sheesh!
-
just ask CST.. the man he backstabbed
just look at SDP.. the party he destroyed..
Bear, what are your views on this:
- Blurred by spin Said,
“For one, Mr Chiam was not ousted from SDP by Dr Chee. He voluntarily engineered his own exit, contrary to what the state media would have us believe.” Ng E-Jay, you are absolutely correct. If one reads the 1994 Volume 1 of the Singapore Law Report at page 278, the following sequence of events were established:
(1) On 17/5/1993, at a Cenral Executive Committee (CEC) meeting of the SDP, Chiam tried to introduce a motion to censure Chee SJ for his hunger stike. NOBODY (not even his 2 favoured party members (I’m not referring to CSJ) brought into SDP by him) supported him. Not being a team player, he wrote out a resignation note on the spot. (During the trial Chiam famously declared - and this was reported in the Straits Times - that he was like a General; when he gives an order everyone must charge!)
(2) For the next few weeks, several attempts were made by CEC members to ask Chiam to withdraw his resignation. He refused and instead started making demands. Meanwhile, the CEC tried to keep a tight lid on Chiam’s resignation.
(3) On 18/6/1993, when the local media started to sniff closer to the door, the CEC had no choice but to announce Chiam’s resignation and even then tried to put a positive spin to the event by praising Chiam for his contribution to opposition politics.
(4) On 16/7/1993, Chiam did the unthinkable, and, to me as an outside observer, an unforgivable thing: he went to the very core of the PAP propaganda machine, namely, the Times House (then at Kim Seng Road), and gave a talk denouncing his fellow CEC members.
(5) Events were then set in motion when the SDP CEC asked Chiam to appear before a disciplinary committee. Chiam was found guilty and expelled from SDP.Look, if you join a club with rules and you start bad-mouthing the leadership and your own members, the leaders really have no choice but to haul you up for discipline isn’t it? Although the judge found the disciplinary process against Chiam ineptly conducted - and there are some who do not quite agree with the reasoning of the judge - nonetheless it was Chiam who brought it upon himself. After the judgment, Chiam was reinstated as SDP member, but he chose to resign thereafter.
So you see, the above sequence of events have been morphed, by a sleight of hand, assisted no doubt by the likes of Chua Lee Hoong, into Chee Soon Juan (the ingrate brought in by Chiam) having ousted Chiam See Tong.
- http://www.sgpolitics.net/?p=243#more-243
- Blurred by spin Said,
-
i'm sorry.. i saw it happen with my own eyes.. and not on tv...
i saw the look in CST's face.. his eyes..
i saw the shock which CST had when CSJ stuck it in him...
i saw the depths of which SDP has been plunged into.. and CSJ has continued to dig even further..
i have no love for Lau Lee and his son.. i totally loathe them for their horrible nature...
but they have been right about CSJ..
CSJ could not have done the MIW's work better...
look in the past.. when SDP was becoming a credible opposition, CSJ stuck one in CST.. and SDP went to SHIT after that..
for that, you self-professed "politically aware" should bloody well know... as for your "references", they are no better than that of the MIW website.. each side publishes their own propaganda...
for that, you self-professed "politically active" should hate CSJ like the asshole he is.. the man who destroyed ALL the credibility of the opposition had.. the credibility which was slowly EARNED by those before.. and the credibility which has to be slowly recovered by those who will come after...
CSJ, by stabbing CST in the back, stabbed and almost mortally wounded the whole opposition movement...
and you.. you self-professed "politically informed" people, should never forgive him for that..
yet.. you guys seem to think that his fart is perfume.. his verbal diarrhoea is caviar... his bullshit is foie gras...
you guys deserve all the shit Lau Lee and his cronies heap on you... you're no better than the idiots in white.. just the other side of the coin...
and i weep for my country...
-
i saw the look in CST's face.. his eyes..
i saw the shock which CST had when CSJ stuck it in him...
That is not good enough.
We need evidence.
CSJ, by stabbing CST in the back, stabbed and almost mortally wounded the whole opposition movement...
Evidence?
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
"CSJ doesn't need help to disgrace himself''.Thanks for your diligent overtime work to prove it here.
Had the DeerHunter again decided to become foolish to return again to hunt for his delusded deer in Singapore ?
There are more ''Gazelles and Bears'' which are plentiful at ten cents for a dozen at your favorite toy shop then there are deers for you to hunt.
"why risk your unsolicited and bias derogatory comments about CSJ, and get yourself tarred for your wicked devotion to run down a fallen person ?"
Aren't you equally doing to the same? but this time you done well and rightly too.
Are you certain you are looking at the right end of your hunting scope ?
Or are you looking at a 'blank poiint' with your 'Pont Blank' vision ?
"Are you bitten by the same bug that made CSJ an 'attention seeking whore' - by seeking attention for (his) whoring ways as a dishonest political commentator ?"
At least you were honest to admit CSJ as what he really is.
Are you suggesting that you are also an 'attention seeking whore' in the same manner that you keep returning for more swipes, just as you have announced your hanging up of your impotent useless pop-gun ?
"This surely speaks alot about you - who will identify yourself closer to a carnivore then the sensitivity of any Human Being with reason."
No, i will say you are no carnivore, just speaking your mind honestly and finally on what you really think CSJ is.
Is this a back-handed compliment ?
It seems that you cannot help yourself from not admiring me and conclude that I am no carnivore like a sly Bear.
"Even if you cannot side with CSJ or his cause, there is no reason for you to trample a fallen person deeper into the rut that he got himself into."
You trampled CSJ well. I applaud you. Just telling it as it is. Well done. In your own words too.
The best compliment that you can offer is with your effort at imitating my style.
Unfortunately, a juvenile will remain forever a juvenile - no matter how hard the effort to be accelerate the wheels of time, you will have to wait to get past puberty.
A fool will always hope to wear shoes that are too big for his feet, but will surely find use for it as his head is bigger than his feet.
Did you not claim that you will be embarrass to become a fool arguing with me ?
If you continued making your useless 'blank point' arguements in at least two threads now, have you not been embarrassed already after proven again to be a fool ?
-
Originally posted by the Bear:
i'm sorry.. i saw it happen with my own eyes.. and not on tv...
i saw the look in CST's face.. his eyes..
i saw the shock which CST had when CSJ stuck it in him...
i saw the depths of which SDP has been plunged into.. and CSJ has continued to dig even further..
i have no love for Lau Lee and his son.. i totally loathe them for their horrible nature...
but they have been right about CSJ..
CSJ could not have done the MIW's work better...
look in the past.. when SDP was becoming a credible opposition, CSJ stuck one in CST.. and SDP went to SHIT after that..
for that, you self-professed "politically aware" should bloody well know... as for your "references", they are no better than that of the MIW website.. each side publishes their own propaganda...
for that, you self-professed "politically active" should hate CSJ like the asshole he is.. the man who destroyed ALL the credibility of the opposition had.. the credibility which was slowly EARNED by those before.. and the credibility which has to be slowly recovered by those who will come after...
CSJ, by stabbing CST in the back, stabbed and almost mortally wounded the whole opposition movement...
and you.. you self-professed "politically informed" people, should never forgive him for that..
yet.. you guys seem to think that his fart is perfume.. his verbal diarrhoea is caviar... his bullshit is foie gras...
you guys deserve all the shit Lau Lee and his cronies heap on you... you're no better than the idiots in white.. just the other side of the coin...
and i weep for my country...
'i weep for my country' ?
If this is not a half-baked twisted attempt at plagiarising Shakespeare's well crafted lines from one of his dark plays, when betrayals amongst conspiirators attempting to save their own skins after mudering the people's Hero.
Have you been diligently reading Shakespear's writings and learning the treachorous speeches of Antony and Brutus in their efforts to divert public anger from their own muderous acts on Julius Caesar ?
You should save your false tears for your attempt to murder every single budding option from the Alternative Parties that dare to confront the Autocratic Political Party; and for your acts of sabotage to the efforts to change the existing political status quo.
Were you a member of the SDP Exco when they collectively voted for CST to be disciplined for the actions he took at making his Press Conference ?
For a Bear that is not even lucid to the events that led to CST ouster by the SDP Exco - can you even be present to see any shock appearing on CST's face ?
Was SDP fall in its fortune due entirely to CSJ, or was it the mobilising of the entire political machinery to demolish CSJ completely - with the politially machinery owned and operated by the Government and its GLCs that are controlled by the PAP ?
Is this not the handiwork of LKY to make CSJ an example for all other professionals to stay clear from politics if they were to reject a PAP invitation to join them ?
Could CSJ alone - single-handedly - murder the entire Opposition Movement - when WP Low Thia Kiang and SDA-Chiam See Tong continue to successfully retain their own constituency seats ?
If others are having diarohhea, you seem to be having choked up constipation with your inability to produce anything of consequence - except for the constant bad odour that spew from your mouth with the smell similar to fart from a stinking Bear ?
If Chiam See Tong had disputed the events as reported in Wikipedia concerning the History of SDP - has he produced anything on his blogs or the SDA website to make corrections with his own views to the poltical course of events that affected him ?
All you have to offer is your dubuious views and statements made without any substantial evidence that does more damage to the reputation of CSJ and the Alternative Parties.
It is clear that your obscene agenda in helping LKY and the PAP to destroy CSJ and the Alternative Parites with your efforts to divert attention and cover up for LKY in mobilising the efforts of His Team, and the machinery ''owned and controlled'' by him to destroy the Alternative Parties to control Singapore without any interference from any other Politicians or Political Parties.
CSJ has been able to stand up to LKY, as CSJ refused to play football based on the International Foot Federation Rules that is specially interpreted by LKY to suit his own size football field, and his own specially design Goal Post that he constantly shift depending on the weather that refuse to follow his own choice.
LKY can hope to control anything and everything that he can think that he can touch, but only Nature's elements will be beyond his reach, and the political minds of Singaporeans' are out-of-his reach.
He can attempt to buy the hearts and minds of Singaporeans, but he will still have to shift the goal posts come every Big Game that comes along every five years, tinker at the rules that will govern the Game, and may even redraw the perimeter lines and change the shape of the corners or even redesign the standard Goal Posts, or make the field muddier by soaking the playing field and making it unlevel.
Are you better than all those whom you accuse as better than the "idiots in white" ?
With everyone being an idiot, where does that place you when you are living within your deluded nation of idiots ?
Are you in some kind of state of denial ?
No wonder you are in a constant state of constipation, unable to produce anything beyond the foul air from every blank spoof with every one of your effort.
-
Originally posted by Atobe:
Had the DeerHunter again decided to become foolish to return again to hunt for his delusded deer in Singapore ?
There are more ''Gazelles and Bears'' which are plentiful at ten cents for a dozen at your favorite toy shop then there are deers for you to hunt.
Are you certain you are looking at the right end of your hunting scope ?
Or are you looking at a 'blank poiint' with your 'Pont Blank' vision ?
Are you suggesting that you are also an 'attention seeking whore' in the same manner that you keep returning for more swipes, just as you have announced your hanging up of your impotent useless pop-gun ?
Is this a back-handed compliment ?
It seems that you cannot help yourself from not admiring me and conclude that I am no carnivore like a sly Bear.
The best compliment that you can offer is with your effort at imitating my style.
Unfortunately, a juvenile will remain forever a juvenile - no matter how hard the effort to be accelerate the wheels of time, you will have to wait to get past puberty.
A fool will always hope to wear shoes that are too big for his feet, but will surely find use for it as his head is bigger than his feet.
Did you not claim that you will be embarrass to become a fool arguing with me ?
If you continued making your useless 'blank point' arguements in at least two threads now, have you not been embarrassed already after proven again to be a fool ?
Huh? Twisting your own words again? Isn't the following your very own words on the true nature of CSJ?:-
"Are you bitten by the same bug that made CSJ an 'attention seeking whore' "
Defined lucidly in your own words:-whoring ways as a dishonest political commentator ?" -
DeerHunter, you might be interested in "The Dictator Hunter".