16 Oct, 10:06AM in sunny Singapore!

US Army to Retire BDUs

Subscribe to US Army to Retire BDUs 7 posts

Please Login or Signup to reply.
  • LRRP's Avatar
    308 posts since Mar '04
  • edwin3060's Avatar
    260 posts since Jun '07
    • Digital camo is just the in-thing nowadays lah. It is only slightly more effective in tests than the old BDUs at best. Not worth the cost of changing over, because to print the digital pattern requires more expensive inks and a new printing process. Lots of problems with durability reported also. I'd rather they keep the same No.4 Pattern and change the design of the uniform with shoulder pockets and stuff. One advantage would be no more folding of smart 4 Laughing

      Edited by edwin3060 26 Jan `08, 6:47PM
  • LRRP's Avatar
    308 posts since Mar '04
  • i spy with my night vision eyes.
    wonderamazement's Avatar
    11,438 posts since Dec '04
  • sgf's Avatar
    368 posts since Feb '06
  • Moderator
    Shotgun's Avatar
    5,896 posts since Jul '00
    • Originally posted by edwin3060:
      Digital camo is just the in-thing nowadays lah. It is only slightly more effective in tests than the old BDUs at best. Not worth the cost of changing over, because to print the digital pattern requires more expensive inks and a new printing process. Lots of problems with durability reported also. I'd rather they keep the same No.4 Pattern and change the design of the uniform with shoulder pockets and stuff. One advantage would be no more folding of smart 4 Laughing

      Not slightly... its really a lot more effective. Very hard to spot in vegetation because theres not real outline in the prints.

      Edited by Shotgun 27 Jan `08, 3:01AM
  • edwin3060's Avatar
    260 posts since Jun '07
    • Not really… in the US Army tests, Multicam, which is non-digital, beat out all the digital prints. The US Army chose the digital print because the company had more experience in mass production.

Please Login or Signup to reply.