<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in 'SAR 21 combine modified Kalashnikov/Stoner operating sys' | sgForums.com</title>
    <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/315533</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://www.sgforums.com/open_search.xml"/>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>SAR 21 combine modified Kalashnikov/Stoner operating sys replied by Sepecat @ Thu, 08 May 2008 23:08:35 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;What a pity !&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SAR21 cud have been a much better
rifle. Buying off the shelf&amp;nbsp; or sticking to M16 or M4 like
Malaysia&amp;nbsp;is probably&amp;nbsp;better decision.&amp;nbsp; SAR21 has no
significant improvement over M16 / M4 &amp;nbsp;series.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After all, battle weary Americans have been using it since 1960s
; so it&amp;nbsp;is still a good weapon.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:08:35 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1164:315533:8071915</guid>
      <author>Sepecat</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/315533</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAR 21 combine modified Kalashnikov/Stoner operating sys replied by SingaporeTyrannosaur @ Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:14:56 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LOL OWNAGE..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course what, lionnoisy too itchy already despite having been
totally discredited he still feel the urge to post. After one day
he cannot tahan liao.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So instead of improving himself and learning more things so he
can make sensible posts, he just comes back here with some copy and
past of technobabble and think that will save him from being
owned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But lol, notice how he has fallen totally silent about the thing
we are really INTERESTED in about him?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And that is not his posts, but his:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CLONE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/forums/10/topics/315326" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;http://sgforums.com/forums/10/topics/315326&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A sock puppet is an &lt;em&gt;additional&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=
"http://sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/mb.pl?OnlineIdentity" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0066cc;"&gt;OnlineIdentity&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
used by someone who already has another &lt;a href=
"http://sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/mb.pl?OnlineIdentity" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0066cc;"&gt;OnlineIdentity&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
for participating in a given community, particularly when done in a
non-transparent manner and where the identities interact with each
other in some way. &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;The term
originates with the metaphor of carrying on a conversation with
oneself using a puppet in each hand.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;Deception&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Use of a&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;a href="http://sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/mb.pl?SockPuppet"
rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SockPuppet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;span style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;is typically frowned
on.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The social convention against sock puppets
arises from the &lt;a href=
"http://sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/mb.pl?RealWorld" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0066cc;"&gt;RealWorld&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. We
do not expect to discover that the guy who runs the coffee shop is
also our neighbour, but with a fake mustache and beard. In most
communities there is at least a social expectation, and sometimes a
site policy, that each person will use only a single identity.
&lt;span style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thus, use of sock puppets is
a&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href=
"http://sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/mb.pl?DeceptivePractice"
rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DeceptivePractice&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href="http://sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/mb.pl?PenName"
rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0066cc;"&gt;PenName&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (or
anonymous posting) is about discretionary exposure of personally
identifying information, and doesn't exclude the possibility of
participating with a measure of integrity since discretion and
deception are not at all the same thing. It is fair to expect that
we all exercise a certain measure of discretion, but it is hoped
that we do not engage in intentional deception. &lt;span style=
"color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href=
"http://sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/mb.pl?SockPuppet" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SockPuppet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;,
on the other hand, is dishonestly represented as being a unique
individual, distinct from the existing identities already in use in
the community.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Uses&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By using several Sock Puppets all posting in favour of an idea,
&lt;span style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;a dishonest person can give
the impression that the idea has more grass-roots support than it
really has.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; See also &lt;a href=
"http://sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/mb.pl?StuffingTheBallotBox"
rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #0066cc;"&gt;StuffingTheBallotBox&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, which is a
similar problem in a more formal, voting context. Sock puppets make
it harder to enforce "one man, one vote."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sock puppet identities are disruptive in conversation because
they are often used so that a person can &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #ff0000;"&gt;ask questions of himself and appear to be
carrying on a thread between two individuals.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:14:56 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1164:315533:8039506</guid>
      <author>SingaporeTyrannosaur</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/315533</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAR 21 combine modified Kalashnikov/Stoner operating sys replied by tankfanatic @ Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:04:20 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;LOL OWNAGE..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;anyway lion...the only way a REAL advanced improvement in
assault rifle is when someone (like you) invent the plasma
gun....untill then its all about refreshing previous design.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:04:20 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1164:315533:8039482</guid>
      <author>tankfanatic</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/315533</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAR 21 combine modified Kalashnikov/Stoner operating sys replied by SingaporeTyrannosaur @ Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:58:55 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just to refresh u guys about SAR 21:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don't bother, we know much MORE about the SAR-21 then you. Many
of us have shot it, taken it apart, and trained with it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have you?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fact&amp;nbsp;we are&amp;nbsp;more interested to know about one
thing:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What happened to makepeace? Your clone?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just to refresh you about makepeace:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=
"http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x320/singaporetyrannosaur/clone1.jpg"
class="" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;img src=
"http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x320/singaporetyrannosaur/clone1.jpg"
height="440" alt="the clone appears" width="288" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=
"http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x320/singaporetyrannosaur/clone2.jpg"
class="" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;img src=
"http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x320/singaporetyrannosaur/clone2.jpg"
height="88" alt=
"his &amp;amp;amp;quot;reply&amp;amp;amp;quot; to his clone" width=
"288" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=
"http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x320/singaporetyrannosaur/clone3.jpg"
class="" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;img src=
"http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x320/singaporetyrannosaur/clone3.jpg"
height="203" alt="irrational replies and excuses" width=
"288" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=
"http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x320/singaporetyrannosaur/clone4.jpg"
class="" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;img src=
"http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x320/singaporetyrannosaur/clone4.jpg"
height="53" alt="more desperate replies" width="288" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:58:55 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1164:315533:8039469</guid>
      <author>SingaporeTyrannosaur</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/315533</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAR 21 combine modified Kalashnikov/Stoner operating sys replied by SingaporeTyrannosaur @ Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:57:53 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some may offer ideas to wait for new technologies mature then SG
make a better rifle.No country can afford to wait defending her
people.A ready product is much better than a very advanced
rifle,but appearing only in the monitor!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What rubbish are you talking about?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Technology has already matured enough to provide a superior
rifle to the basic SAR-21, one can easily see this in the TAR-21
that came out&amp;nbsp;at around the same time as&amp;nbsp;the SAR but was
already more advanced with better sights as well as being lighter,
as well as having found far more customers overseas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even the H&amp;amp;K G36 had far better sights and was around before
the SAR came about.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You just can't accept facts can you? The SAR-21 is not an
advanced AR given even modest firearm technologies, the main reason
is because it is cheap compared to other systems and could be
produced locally. But there are better rifles out there then the
SAR-21 basic for our soldiers. When ST made the SAR, technology was
already there to make a better weapon but they didn't and other
people did. And it's only later that they decide to play catch up
in coming up with variants that the SAF is not using at all while
our soldiers are stuck with a less-then-adequate weapon (as opposed
to what we could have done).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LOL, you just can't accept that ST makes only so-so weapons and
exists because we have a need for a local arms industry. Despite
all your claptrap, it's FAR from being the best in many things.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:57:53 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1164:315533:8039465</guid>
      <author>SingaporeTyrannosaur</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/315533</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAR 21 combine modified Kalashnikov/Stoner operating sys replied by lionnoisy @ Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:33:08 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AR 21 is not a good rifle.There are still some problems as
reflectd by some forumers here,if their views reflecting the
general performances of SAR 21.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But it is the best SAR 21 SG can offer,based on the CURRENT
technology avaiable to SG and funding .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some may offer ideas to wait for new technologies mature then SG
make a better rifle.No country can afford to wait defending her
people.A ready product is much better than a very advanced
rifle,but appearing only in the monitor!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=
"font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;
Whether u like to hear or not,SAR 21&amp;nbsp; combine the features
of&amp;nbsp; ''&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=
"font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;
modified Kalashnikov/ Stoner operating system&lt;/span&gt;,''&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just to refresh u guys about SAR 21:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=
"font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"&gt;''...The
trigger mechanism is excellent with a relatively light, crisp
release - which we estimate to be around 2.3kg -with little creep
or backlash. This is accomplished via a stiff sliding plate that
links the trigger and fire-control unit, rather than a flexible rod
or similar mechanism used in some bullpup designs that result in a
heavy and sluggish trigger pull.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SAR-21 uses what might best be described &lt;span style=
"color: #ff0000;"&gt;as a modified Kalashnikov/ Stoner operating
system&lt;/span&gt;, with a long Kalashnikov-style operating rod in a gas
tube over the barrel and a Stoner-style unitary bolt carrier with
firing pin, retained cam pin and bolt. This melding of two proven
operating systems should be extremely reliable and robust.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gas port settings are adjustable without tools to compensate
for heavy use. Adjustment is accomplished by simply lifting the gas
regulator and rotating the adjustment knob to one of its three
settings. The bolt itself is of the conventional rotating type, its
two massive lugs locking into recesses in the barrel extension. The
polymer receiver therefore, receives little
stress.....''&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.enemyforces.com/firearms/sar21_3.jpg"
height="239" alt="" width="464" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.enemyforces.com/firearms/sar21.htm&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://world.guns.ru/assault/akm_cut.jpg" alt=
"" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://world.guns.ru/assault/akm_cut.jpg&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://world.guns.ru/assault/m16a3xray.jpg" height=
"350" alt="" width="461" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;&amp;lt;!--[endif]--&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;M 16A3 receiver X ray image.Aluminum parts in
blue color,steel are balck.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://world.guns.ru/assault/m16a3xray.jpg&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://world.guns.ru/assault/as18-e.htm#tech&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=
"http://home.comcast.net/~sfischer397/stoner/stonerpics/63abg.jpg"
height="127" alt="" width="385" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 class=""&gt;The Stoner 63A Receiver&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://home.comcast.net/~sfischer397/index.htm&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://home.comcast.net/~sfischer397/stoner/receiver.htm&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2.Question&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=
"font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"&gt;What
is&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;''&lt;span style=
"font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"&gt;a
Stoner-style unitary bolt carrier with firing pin, retained cam pin
and bolt.''&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;any cross section,video clip etc can help to explain&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:33:08 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1164:315533:8038753</guid>
      <author>lionnoisy</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/315533</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
