17 May, 04:36PM in sunny Singapore!

Leo 2 New Armour Upgrade

Subscribe to Leo  2 New  Armour Upgrade 19 posts

Please Login or Signup to reply.
  • Vincepcb's Avatar
    14 posts since Jan '08
    •  

      Will Singapore be getting this new armour upgraded Leos instead ? Look menacing icon_evil.gif

      Edited by Vincepcb 04 May `08, 9:41PM
  • wonderamazement's Avatar
    8,426 posts since Dec '04
  • Shotgun's Avatar
    5,562 posts since Jul '00
    • No, its a Leo2A4 w/ AMAP. I think there was some posts on this already.  This was on JDW about a month ago.  They started selling this package only in February I think...

  • tankfanatic's Avatar
    1,008 posts since Mar '07
  • edwin3060's Avatar
    204 posts since Jun '07
    • Wouldn't it change the MLC of the L2A4 tt we bought? It will be hard to hide something like that.

  • CM06's Avatar
    612 posts since Dec '06
    • 1) This new armour upgrade will weight under 60 tons. IOW, no problem

      2) This new armour set is like lego.  When you want to use it, put it on. When you dont, take it off.

  • Vincepcb's Avatar
    14 posts since Jan '08
  • I_love_my_toilet's Avatar
    629 posts since Sep '04
    • passive and reactive armor "passé" liao leh

      i tot active is the "in" thing now ? :D

  • Sepecat's Avatar
    39 posts since Jan '08
  • edwin3060's Avatar
    204 posts since Jun '07
    • Oh cool I didn't know that. IIRC, active protection is just another layer of defence just like passive or reactive, it can get overwhelmed, it may trigger spuriously etc etc. Besides, passive armour is the only one that allows Infantry to work in close support without being shredded by their own side's protection :P

  • Bionic Animals's Avatar
    35 posts since Jan '07
  • Shotgun's Avatar
    5,562 posts since Jul '00
  • Sepecat's Avatar
    39 posts since Jan '08
  • I_love_my_toilet's Avatar
    629 posts since Sep '04
  • sgf's Avatar
    357 posts since Feb '06
    • I think the only thing they are adding is the battlefield mgmt system.  Doubt they'd be slapping on more armour or firepower.

  • Shotgun's Avatar
    5,562 posts since Jul '00
    • Originally posted by Sepecat:

      MINDEF is not infallible ?   

      To be sure, someone please send a note to MINDEF


      Nope, but I'm saying that KWM would have informed Mindef of such development going on for the 2A4s to "sweeten" the deal.  I sure wasn't talking about Mindef.

  • justcooler's Avatar
    358 posts since Sep '05
    • But what is the used of having this additional armour when here is not immediate tread to us. It cost more per tank to buy and to run.

       

      OR why not have a clean Leo and we fix our own strong and light weight armour pack

  • edwin3060's Avatar
    204 posts since Jun '07
    • MINDEF is not infallible but it is not stupid either-- this is one of the most expensive items in the Army inventory-- I'm sure they have considered this upgrade. Whether they adopt it or not will ultimately be based on factors, not all of which will be known to the general public.

  • Bionic Animals's Avatar
    35 posts since Jan '07
    • Wait for NDP 2008. Maybe we will see the 'add-ons'. If not, drop another note to MINDEF to review the capability of the NDP organising chairman. Head must roll!!icon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gif

Please Login or Signup to reply.