http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 en-US 60 <p>Wait for NDP 2008. Maybe we will see the 'add-ons'. If not, drop another note to MINDEF to review the capability of the NDP organising chairman. Head must roll!!<img src= "/images/emoticons/classic/icon_lol.gif" alt= "icon_lol.gif" /><img src="/images/emoticons/classic/icon_lol.gif" alt="icon_lol.gif" /><img src= "/images/emoticons/classic/icon_lol.gif" alt="icon_lol.gif" /></p> Thu, 15 May 2008 16:55:30 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8088780 Bionic Animals http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>MINDEF is not infallible but it is not stupid either-- this is one of the most expensive items in the Army inventory-- I'm sure they have considered this upgrade. Whether they adopt it or not will ultimately be based on factors, not all of which will be known to the general public.</p> Fri, 09 May 2008 20:23:35 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8074043 edwin3060 http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>But what is the used of having this additional armour when here is not immediate tread to us. It cost more per tank to buy and to run.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>OR why not have a clean Leo and we fix our own strong and light weight armour pack</p> Fri, 09 May 2008 11:11:45 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8072885 justcooler http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <blockquote> <div class="quote_from">Originally posted by Sepecat:</div> <div class="quote_body"> <p>MINDEF is not infallible ?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p>To be sure, someone please send a note to MINDEF</p> </div> </blockquote> <p><br /> Nope, but I'm saying that KWM would have informed Mindef of such development going on for the 2A4s to "sweeten" the deal.&nbsp; I sure wasn't talking about Mindef.</p> Wed, 07 May 2008 21:13:19 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8068994 Shotgun http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>I think the only thing they are adding is the battlefield mgmt system.&nbsp; Doubt they'd be slapping on more armour or firepower.</p> Wed, 07 May 2008 13:50:10 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8068116 sgf http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>Ang Mos are good at "washing hands" <img src= "/images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/set1/smile.png" alt="smile.png" /></p> Wed, 07 May 2008 00:26:52 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8067183 I_love_my_toilet http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>MINDEF is not infallible ?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p>To be sure, someone please send a note to MINDEF</p> Tue, 06 May 2008 23:43:40 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8067020 Sepecat http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>You honestly think that Mindef wasn't informed by KWM when they made the purchase?</p> Tue, 06 May 2008 20:59:30 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8066475 Shotgun http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p><span style="color: #0000ff;">Can someone please sent a note to MINDEF?<img src="/images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/redones/biggrin.png" alt="biggrin.png" /></span></p> Tue, 06 May 2008 18:05:10 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8066047 Bionic Animals http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>Oh cool I didn't know that. IIRC, active protection is just another layer of defence just like passive or reactive, it can get overwhelmed, it may trigger spuriously etc etc. Besides, passive armour is the only one that allows Infantry to work in close support without being shredded by their own side's protection :P</p> Tue, 06 May 2008 14:51:36 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8065604 edwin3060 http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>Cant wait to see an upgraded SAF Leo2 A4. Hope it comes soon.</p> Tue, 06 May 2008 13:33:26 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8065436 Sepecat http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>passive and reactive armor "<span class="">passé</span>" liao leh</p> <p>i tot active is the "in" thing now ? :D</p> Mon, 05 May 2008 20:02:46 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8063711 I_love_my_toilet http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>Looks more aggressive then our neighbour's&nbsp; PT-91M.</p> Mon, 05 May 2008 19:57:27 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8063695 Vincepcb http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>1) This new armour upgrade will weight under 60 tons. IOW, no problem</p> <p>2) This new armour set is like lego.&nbsp; When you want to use it, put it on. When you dont, take it off.</p> Mon, 05 May 2008 17:11:39 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8063249 CM06 http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>Wouldn't it change the MLC of the L2A4 tt we bought? It will be hard to hide something like that.</p> Mon, 05 May 2008 16:31:41 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8063171 edwin3060 http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>oh what a beauty....pretier than my girlfriend</p> Mon, 05 May 2008 01:17:05 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8062019 tankfanatic http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>No, its a Leo2A4 w/ AMAP. I think there was some posts on this already.&nbsp; This was on JDW about a month ago.&nbsp; They started selling this package only in February I think...</p> Mon, 05 May 2008 00:53:59 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8061965 Shotgun http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p>looks like leclercs though.</p> Sun, 04 May 2008 21:55:00 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8061408 wonderamazement http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482 <p><img src= "http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/8660/leopard2a4nv4hi8.jpg" alt= "" /></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Will Singapore be getting this new armour upgraded Leos instead ? Look menacing <img src="/images/emoticons/classic/icon_evil.gif" alt="icon_evil.gif" /></p> Sun, 04 May 2008 21:17:02 +0800 www.sgforums.com:1164:316482:8061326 Vincepcb http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1164/topics/316482