06 Sep, 03:07PM in sunny Singapore!

U.S. Army gets new combat uniform

Subscribe to U.S. Army gets new combat uniform 26 posts

Please Login or Signup to reply.
  • cavsg's Avatar
    779 posts since Oct '02
    • WASHINGTON (Army News Service, June 14, 2004) - The Army will be fielding a new combat uniform designed by NCOs and tested by Stryker Brigade Soldiers in Iraq since October.

      On the Army's 229th birthday, senior leadership introduced the Army Combat Uniform during a Pentagon cake-cutting ceremony. Soldiers were on display, suited-up in the wrinkle-free uniform with a digitized camouflage pattern.

      image

      image

      image

      image

      http://www4.army.mil/news/article.php?story=6042

      Edited by cavsg 15 Jun `04, 9:57AM
  • sgboy2004's Avatar
    43,907 posts since Dec '02
  • kopiosatu's Avatar
    50,132 posts since Jan '03
  • Obersturmfuhrer's Avatar
    1,196 posts since Jun '04
    • A combat uniform need not neccessarily look good to function properly. If you want to look good, go get Armani to design your own uniform, but then again, this is not your Ah Kong's army right? Laughing

  • ziezoe's Avatar
    375 posts since May '04
  • orionlight's Avatar
    1,101 posts since Jun '04
  • spencer99's Avatar
    1,913 posts since Jan '03
    • Looks like a Russian Interior Ministry trooper.

      probably designed with urban warfare in mind. But kind of strange to an army that is not wearing brown/green.

  • wuming78's Avatar
    17,147 posts since May '03
  • FG42's Avatar
    102 posts since Jun '04
    • i personally feel that like having good equipments, uniform is very important as it’ll affect the morale of troops. Germany fought well in the beginning of WW2 and their uniforms were designed by Hugo Boss, especially the Waffen SS. They were almost invincible until the war with the Soviets when they actually lost it due to weather. The Allies will have no chance at all if Germany have enough supplies and fuel. A smart set of uniform is a morale booster.

  • you cannot has
    ditzy's Avatar
    49,661 posts since Dec '03
  • Icemoon's Avatar
    12,797 posts since May '03
  • LazerLordz's Avatar
    34,776 posts since Apr '03
    • Well it looks very totalitarian to me..Don;t ask me why but it really looks like somethings out from a B-grade Cold War-themed movie where Soviet-like states dressed their foot soldiers in. Cool

  • sgboy2004's Avatar
    43,907 posts since Dec '02
  • psykror7's Avatar
    41 posts since Jun '04
    • dun look too good for hot weather.... imagine if we got someting like dat, and sbo over it, too easy to get heatstroke even for soc run. Neutral

  • LazerLordz's Avatar
    34,776 posts since Apr '03
    • Disruptive pattern BDU..looks best for urban warfare in dusty areas.But wonder how there isn't a sandy hue to it..unless the US wants to use it in Nordic city centers. Twisted Evil

  • wuming78's Avatar
    17,147 posts since May '03
    • Originally posted by psykror7:
      dun look too good for hot weather.... imagine if we got someting like dat, and sbo over it, too easy to get heatstroke even for soc run. Neutral

      tt is not meant for singaporean weather mah. anyway the impt is the camouflage pattern.

  • SingaporeMacross's Avatar
    5,897 posts since Jan '03
  • southpark2000's Avatar
    64 posts since Apr '04
  • Kaczynski's Avatar
    804 posts since Feb '03
    • Hmm, I guess the reactions were typical to when the US Army adopted it’s Green Camo uniform then…

  • bcoy's Avatar
    687 posts since Jun '02
  • Tango1's Avatar
    225 posts since Feb '03
    • Originally posted by southpark2000:
      http://www.network54.com/Forum/thread?forumid=211833&messageid=1087254976&lp=1087297734

      Dunno why the digital / pixelated pattern - to foil digital equipment?

      To foil the human eye basically. The CADPAT (Canadian version) was the first in digital camo actually. The little pixels, in various sizes and colours, is actually quite confusing to our eyes at abt 100 metres, if I remember. This is because we cannot process the images properly, owing to the constant break in colours. Whereas for our no. 4, we are able to discern the leafy stripes after awhile... Mr. Green

  • |-|05|'s Avatar
    4,296 posts since Oct '02
    • Originally posted by Tango1:
      To foil the human eye basically. The CADPAT (Canadian version) was the first in digital camo actually. The little pixels, in various sizes and colours, is actually quite confusing to our eyes at abt 100 metres, if I remember. This is because we cannot process the images properly, owing to the constant break in colours. Whereas for our no. 4, we are able to discern the leafy stripes after awhile... Mr. Green

      ya that's the reason.
      Btw there are other colours and shades(well at least the marines and candians do)....this 1 shld be for urban fighting...

  • bcoy's Avatar
    687 posts since Jun '02
    • Originally posted by |-|05|:
      ya that's the reason.
      Btw there are other colours and shades(well at least the marines and candians do)....this 1 shld be for urban fighting...

      From what I understand - the US army will adopt only one camo pattern for all environments.

  • southpark2000's Avatar
    64 posts since Apr '04
    • Originally posted by bcoy:
      From what I understand - the US army will adopt only one camo pattern for all environments.

      True, but might wanna distinguish "pattern" and "colour".....you can have a digital pattern of our existing No. 4 in different colours for different environment (jungle, desert, artic, etc.)

      http://www.hyperstealth.com/CADPAT-MARPAT.htm

      Southpark
      The Dude

  • |-|05|'s Avatar
    4,296 posts since Oct '02
    • taken frm the article frm the 1st post

      "The color scheme in the ACU capitalizes on the environments that we operate in," Myhre said. "The current colors on the ACU are green-woodland, grey-urban environments and sand brown-desert. The pattern is not a 100-percent solution in every environment, but a good solution across the board."

Please Login or Signup to reply.