<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in 'All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists' | sgForums.com</title>
    <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://www.sgforums.com/open_search.xml"/>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:18:13 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the eyes of Buddhism,the doctrine of dependent arising solves
all&lt;br /&gt;
metaphysical philosophical problems.Etiology is solved because
there is,&lt;br /&gt;
not an absolute beginning, but an temporally indeterminate welling
up of&lt;br /&gt;
mutually-conditioned factors.Since no factor is temporally prior,
as such,&lt;br /&gt;
the discussions of genesis manage to avoid positing an absolute
beginning&lt;br /&gt;
without recourse either to a metaphysical entity like a
transcendent&lt;br /&gt;
God or to causal priority ad infinitum. Eschatology is solved
because,&lt;br /&gt;
since the ultimate end of existence is merely the appeasement of
arising&lt;br /&gt;
through appeasement of ignorant dispositions, there is no need to
predict&lt;br /&gt;
apocalypses or nihilistic destruction of existence. Things arose,
but there&lt;br /&gt;
was no ultimate cause, and things will cease, but there is no
ultimate fate.&lt;br /&gt;
Soteriology is likewise solved; one need not face either a final
Judgment&lt;br /&gt;
Day nor mere annihilation, but rather one will just face the
self-caused&lt;br /&gt;
abandonment of equally self-caused afflicted existence.When
ignorance&lt;br /&gt;
ceases, birth ceases, and death ceases. Karma, metempsychosis, and
the&lt;br /&gt;
nature of the soul are also all solved without recourse to abstract
soul-&lt;br /&gt;
theories. Karma is neither an adventitious elemental defilement,
like it is&lt;br /&gt;
for the Jains, nor a subtle and transcendental deterministic fate,
like for&lt;br /&gt;
certain schools of Hinduism. Karma is simply the correlation
between&lt;br /&gt;
cause and effect. Karma is determined by one&#8217;s actions and
dispositions,&lt;br /&gt;
and when one appeases one&#8217;s dispositions then, when eventually the
lingering effects of prior causes have come to fruition, existence
will be no&lt;br /&gt;
more. The simple conditioning of one link by another link enables
the&lt;br /&gt;
Buddhist karma to be determined without being deterministic,and
subtle&lt;br /&gt;
without being transcendental. Reincarnation is similarly solved
with no&lt;br /&gt;
recourse to atman-theories.Death is conditioned by birth, which is
in turn&lt;br /&gt;
conditioned by ignorance.Thiscontiguous contingencyobviates the
need&lt;br /&gt;
to posit a substantial and transcendently-enduring soul. The
perceived&lt;br /&gt;
existence and continuity of the individual is likewise explained
without&lt;br /&gt;
recourse to atman: since the aggregates of the individual arise
together,&lt;br /&gt;
and these aggregates account for the entire nature of the
individual, there&lt;br /&gt;
is no need to posit an extraneous metaphysical entity like the
self.The debate&lt;br /&gt;
of free will versus determinism is also solved.There can be no
&#8220;free&#8221;&lt;br /&gt;
will, for no element of existence is independent. All things are
dependent&lt;br /&gt;
upon other things, and so is the will. This does not mean that the
universe&lt;br /&gt;
is bound by inexorable determinism: the Buddha declared himself to
be&lt;br /&gt;
an upholder of &#8220;free action,&#8221;1 for it is one&#8217;s will in the form of
volitional&lt;br /&gt;
dispositions which both caused existence in the first place and
will ultimately&lt;br /&gt;
bring about appeasement and freedom.2 Two more theories
repugnant&lt;br /&gt;
to the Buddha, the extremes of eternalism and
annihilationism,&lt;br /&gt;
are obviated by dependent arising. Nothing is eternal, for, when a
thing&#8217;s&lt;br /&gt;
conditioning factors cease, then it will cease.Neither is anything
destined&lt;br /&gt;
to face destruction in non-existence for,as contingent upon other
things, it&lt;br /&gt;
was never independently real in the first place. Finally, dependent
arising&lt;br /&gt;
solves ontology. Things are empirically real, for they were arisen.
However,&lt;br /&gt;
they are not ultimately real, for there is no substance, t&#242;n, on
which&lt;br /&gt;
they are founded. There is Becoming, but no Being. Since things are
not&lt;br /&gt;
ultimately real, the affliction of suffering can be vanquished; if
suffering&lt;br /&gt;
were ultimately real, then it could never be abolished.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Abhidharma schools were the first to offer an interpretation of
the doctrine of dependent arising, but interpretation probably was
not their intent. They understood the doctrine to mean the temporal
succession of momentary and discrete elements (dharmas) which were
in themselves real.1They did not see dependent arising to mean that
the elements were only relatively real, but rather they saw it as
describing the interactions&lt;br /&gt;
between already-existing elements. The point of the doctrine
dependent&lt;br /&gt;
arising, they felt,was solely to negate soul-theories, not to
negate&lt;br /&gt;
the elements themselves. Dependence was thus seen as referring to
the&lt;br /&gt;
conditioning relations between the elements,which relations were
meticulously&lt;br /&gt;
analyzed and systematized. It was these relations that became&lt;br /&gt;
seen as the dynamic force of becoming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Perfection of Wisdom (Prajnaparamita) writings criticized
the&lt;br /&gt;
Abhidharma theory of relations as being, not an explanation of
dependent&lt;br /&gt;
arising, but an interpretation of it, and an interpretation with
which&lt;br /&gt;
they disagreed. The systematic hierarchy of relations was seen as
being&lt;br /&gt;
no less metaphysical than the speculative theories of causality
which the&lt;br /&gt;
Buddha was trying to avoid.2 A further problem was that, while it
was&lt;br /&gt;
not explicitly wrong to describe the universe as made up of
discrete elements,&lt;br /&gt;
it was misleading. To isolate an element temporally was to
take&lt;br /&gt;
a first step towards conceptually reifying that element. The
approach&lt;br /&gt;
adopted by the Perfection of Wisdom school was to elevate the
theory of&lt;br /&gt;
dependent arising from the empirical to the conceptual by
formulating a&lt;br /&gt;
two- truth theory, a theory later embraced by Nagarjuna. This
approach&lt;br /&gt;
declared that the Abhidharma schools saw reality from the
standpoint of&lt;br /&gt;
lower, conventional truth, and so they saw all as being composed of
real&lt;br /&gt;
elements which are mutually dependent in terms of causal efficacy.
The&lt;br /&gt;
Perfection of Wisdom, on the other hand, believed themselves to
have&lt;br /&gt;
access to perfect prajna, &#8220;wisdom&#8221; (hence the name of this school,
Prajnaparamita).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the standpoint of higher, ultimate truth afforded by&lt;br /&gt;
such wisdom, elements were seen as being, not just causally
conditioned,&lt;br /&gt;
but even ontologically conditioned. That is, the elements did not
merely&lt;br /&gt;
constitute conglomerate things which, as an assemblage, had no
inherent&lt;br /&gt;
identity and real existence;moreover, rather, the elements
themselves had&lt;br /&gt;
no inherent identity or real existence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result of this interpretation of dependent arising is that the
elements&lt;br /&gt;
are &#8220;empty;&#8221; as dependent arisen, they are not real and are
without&lt;br /&gt;
self-nature. Furthermore, concepts, too, are unreal.3 All concepts
are&lt;br /&gt;
based on dualities as &#8220;tallness&#8221; is dependent on &#8220;shortness.&#8221; The
ultimate&lt;br /&gt;
implication of this interpretation is a shift from emphasis on
logical reasoning,&lt;br /&gt;
as evidenced in the Abhidharma, to non-dual intuition, or
prajna.&lt;br /&gt;
This non-dual intuition prefigured Nagarjuna&#8217;s use of
comprehensive&lt;br /&gt;
four-fold negations and the later mysticism of Zen.1 In the
writings of both the Perfection ofWisdom school and Nagarjuna, all
propositions regarding&lt;br /&gt;
a subject are negated (e.g. something is, is not, both is and is
not,&lt;br /&gt;
neither is nor is not), but no alternative proposition is offered.
The only&lt;br /&gt;
way to grasp the subject is through non-dual, non-conceptual
intuition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(pls continue reading from the book...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Nagarjuna's Mulamadhyamakakarika with Commentary (You can
msg me for a request of this E-Book, I think there are some very
valuable teachings in there but I haven't got the time to read
much. Sent by a friend.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:18:13 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6772009</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:17:03 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;More on Dependent Origination:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;7.1. Dependant Arising as a Central Notion in
Buddhism&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Buddha&#8217;s theory of dependent arising has an immediately
obvious&lt;br /&gt;
significance &#8212; it is the only positive ontological theory expounded
by&lt;br /&gt;
the Buddha.The formulations of the four Noble Truths and the
Eightfold&lt;br /&gt;
Path are of course positive teachings,but they are not really
philosophical&lt;br /&gt;
dogmas. They are descriptions of the condition of humankind, the
ultimate&lt;br /&gt;
goal of humankind, and teachings about how to achieve that
goal.&lt;br /&gt;
Only dependent arising describes the ontic status of the universe
(dependence), its mode of creation (dispositions conditioned by
ignorance), its&lt;br /&gt;
future fate (the appeasement of dispositions which reverses the
cycle of&lt;br /&gt;
arising), the ontic nature of the individual (impersonal aggregates
conditioned&lt;br /&gt;
by ignorance), and the future fate of the individual
(extinction&lt;br /&gt;
through enlightenment). Scholar Gunapala Malalasekera has
expressed&lt;br /&gt;
the status of these various formulations well in saying that &#8220;Just
as the&lt;br /&gt;
Four Noble Truths&#8230; form the heart of the Buddha&#8217;s teaching, so
does&lt;br /&gt;
the doctrine of dependent arising constitute its backbone.&#8221;1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dependent arising was likewise of supreme importance for
Nagarjuna.&lt;br /&gt;
As explained above, Nagarjuna opened his treatise with a
dedication&lt;br /&gt;
that placed dependent arising at the center of his appreciation
of&lt;br /&gt;
the Buddha and as central for Madhyamika thought. Indeed,
renowned&lt;br /&gt;
scholar of Buddhism Gadjin Nagao has gone so far as to say that
Nagarjuna&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;regarded Sakyamuni as the great master precisely because of
his&lt;br /&gt;
elucidation of dependent arising.&#8221;2 As with the above discussion of
selfnature,&lt;br /&gt;
a prefatory presentation of the doctrine and its development
is&lt;br /&gt;
necessary. Dependent arising is not a theory that the Buddha
developed,&lt;br /&gt;
but one that he saw. As he sat under the Bodhi tree on the night of
his&lt;br /&gt;
full awakening he discovered the fact of the mutual contingency of
all&lt;br /&gt;
existent things.This awareness led him to the &#8220;threefold knowledge&#8221;
that&lt;br /&gt;
marked his station as one who had achieved full enlightenment
sambuddhah).&lt;br /&gt;
First, he saw, through his new- found knowledge of dependent&lt;br /&gt;
arising, the origin of suffering in ignorance and the end of
suffering in&lt;br /&gt;
wisdom. Second, fixing &#8220;his mind upon the chain of causation, in
direct&lt;br /&gt;
and reverse order,&#8221;1 he obtained the knowledge of all of his
previous existences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This provided him with the recollection of his previous
actions&lt;br /&gt;
and their karmic consequences, enabling him to see that he had
lived out&lt;br /&gt;
all of his accrued karma and that this would be his last existence.
Third,&lt;br /&gt;
having so clearly perceived the origin of the cycle, he knewwith
certainty&lt;br /&gt;
that he had fully erased the binding ignorance, and would surely
never&lt;br /&gt;
return to existence.He knew himself to be &#8220;Thus Gone;&#8221; he was a
Tathagata.&lt;br /&gt;
2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A key to the Buddha&#8217;s teaching is that he was not the only one
privileged&lt;br /&gt;
to see dependent arising. Anyone who follows the path he
recommended&lt;br /&gt;
can realize its nature and workings. More than this,
individual&lt;br /&gt;
freedom requires that one verify these truths for him- or herself.
The importance of and possibility of perceivingdependent arising
isexemplified&lt;br /&gt;
by the story of the conversion of Sariputta and Moggallana related
in&lt;br /&gt;
chapter one,above:all thatwas needed for each of them to realize
nirvana&lt;br /&gt;
was to be told &#8220;all things that arise will cease.&#8221; The duty of the
Buddhist&lt;br /&gt;
monk who is aware of the Buddha&#8217;s formulation of dependent arising
is&lt;br /&gt;
to examine each of the links for him- or herself, discover how they
are&lt;br /&gt;
conditioned, howthey arose, and howthey can be ceased.3 This is the
key&lt;br /&gt;
to the Buddhist path. The import of this duty is far greater than
merely&lt;br /&gt;
verifying one aspect of the Buddha&#8217;s teachings. Rather, one who
follows&lt;br /&gt;
this will understand the entirety of the Buddha&#8217;s teachings, his
&#8220;dharma,&#8221;&lt;br /&gt;
and, more, one who follows this is guaranteed to see the Buddha
himself.&lt;br /&gt;
He once said &#8220;those who see dependent arising will see the
dharma;those&lt;br /&gt;
who see the dharma will see dependent arising,&#8221; and another time he
said&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;those who see the dharma will see me; those who see me will see
the&lt;br /&gt;
dharma.&#8221;4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;7.2. The Meaning of Dependent Arising&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main formulations of dependent arising, one general
and&lt;br /&gt;
the other specific. In its most abstract form, the theory holds
that &#8220;That&lt;br /&gt;
being, this comes to be; from the arising of that, this arises;
that being&lt;br /&gt;
absent, this is not; from the cessation of that, this ceases.&#8221;1 The
more specific&lt;br /&gt;
formulation details the process by which links in the chain arise,
one&lt;br /&gt;
after the other, and which links directly influence which
others.The most&lt;br /&gt;
common of these specific formulations is the twelve-link one
described&lt;br /&gt;
in chapter two, but there are minor variations on this. The crux of
all formulations of the theory is the mutual interdependence of all
things.Every&lt;br /&gt;
element is both conditioned and is a conditioner, so every element
is both&lt;br /&gt;
an effect and a cause. There is no transcendent law of
cause-and-effect&lt;br /&gt;
ruling the process, for there is only a relative &#8220;before&#8221; and
&#8220;after,&#8221; only a&lt;br /&gt;
relative causal sequence. On the one hand no element is
individually autonomous, and on the other hand neither is there a
higher force ruling the&lt;br /&gt;
process. Since no thing exists on its own, no thing is real in
itself.A thing&lt;br /&gt;
is dependent on another, then, not just for its identification, as
&#8220;tallness&#8221;&lt;br /&gt;
is dependent on &#8220;shortness,&#8221; but for its very existence, as the
piece of&lt;br /&gt;
clothing is dependent upon the threads which constitute it.&lt;br /&gt;
Thus far, the doctrine of dependent arising may seem clear
and&lt;br /&gt;
obvious. If so, it is only because one does not yet understand it
in all of&lt;br /&gt;
its implications.The Buddha&#8217;s attendant, ananda, once said to his
master,&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;It is surprising, sir, it is wonderful, sir, how profound this
dependent&lt;br /&gt;
arising is and how profound is its illumination. Yet it seems to me
as if&lt;br /&gt;
very simple.&#8221; &#8220;Say not so, ananda, say not so,&#8221; admonished the
Buddha&lt;br /&gt;
in reply.2 The theory is abstruse and its ramifications vast.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:17:03 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6771999</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by TWE @ Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:35:49 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As for roaches those who staying as high as 6th floor and above
, most of the time is due to the cockroach flying in sometimes
kamikaze type &lt;img title="Razz" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_razz.gif" alt="Razz" /&gt; cos i
almost got hit in the face by one &lt;img title="Confused" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_confused.gif" alt="Confused" /&gt; .
And mainly is because sometime the cockroach manage to get into
some higher floor homes and then got noticed and was thrown out of
the window alive by some " compassionate beings " but what follows
is the cockroach in a bid to save their own live and also their
future offspring which was mentioned somewhere that only the female
cockroach fly in order to protect their eggs . So while trying to
save their eggs , the cockroach will try their best to fly into any
home that they can reach and try to lay their eggs there . And the
same thing will repeat agn getting caught n thrown out agn floor by
floor till the cockroach get killed or reach the ground floor . Oh
by the way , i noticed that some of the brands of insect killer for
example baygon ( just an example cos i forgot the brand name
already ) they boast of quick knockdown rate where as they actually
dun really kill them but instead only render them unconcious which
we always assume to be killed . I witness an incident that my
engineer ask me to get a can of insecticide to kill the entire nest
of ants . I do as what i was told and walk away when i saw all of
them motionless on the floor . But to my surprise abt 2 hours later
, one by one the ants resume their concious and carry on their
activities . Well the knock down rate is indeed fast but they only
render them unconcious not dead .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:35:49 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6695707</guid>
      <author>TWE</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by cycle @ Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:15:17 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;My ways with ants is this:&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, keep our place clean, especially the kitchen. Wipe
off food debris after we eat, don't leave sweet things around.
Next, if too bad the ants are here, don't panic, just look for the
source which is usually easy to find; then remove the source ( most
of the time just a tiny bit of food) and shake off the ants that
are clinging on the source if any, and viola, they will all run
away and disappear before you finish counting to 5. &lt;img title=
"Smile" src="/images/emoticons/classic/icon_smile.gif" alt=
"Smile" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And those flying insects, I would try to lure them onto a piece of
paper or magazine, then slowly walk to the window and throw them
out. Just the insect, NOT the paper; or else it becomes
littering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for cockroaches, the grandmother's tales is to place pandang
leaves. I don't know how effective is this though, but to keep our
home clean is the basic prevention. I'm very weak infront of
cockroachers, especially the flying ones. Aiyo, I will just run and
cover my head with something, anything! &lt;img title="Mad" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_mad.gif" alt="Mad" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:15:17 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6693647</guid>
      <author>cycle</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:58:19 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Related topic: &lt;a href=
"http://buddhism.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&amp;amp;thread_id=140402"
rel="nofollow"&gt;Ways to get rid of Pests/Insects&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello, my master Ven. Shen Kai offered a solution to Ants and
$*$@roaches. He also mentioned about mosquitoes (but I can't
remember well for that one). I will summarise a few points
below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Ants&lt;/strong&gt; - put some Mei2 You2 near their home, they
dislike the Mei2 You2 and will definitely move away from their home
to somewhere else. To give the ants a sense of direction where to
go you may put some food nearby, and they will go and live there.
But don't put the food too far as it may be difficult for them to
travel that far distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;$*$@roach&lt;/strong&gt; - get some empty Wu3 Jia1 Pi2 Jiu3 (a
type of Chinese traditional beer?). $*$@roaches love to have a beer
and will all go inside. Then you can throw the cans into a dirty
place i.e trash can and let them live in their paradise. I don't
know about other beers, you all could experiment yourself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Mosquitoes&lt;/strong&gt; - I can remember only he mentioend two
ways - burning that mosquito 'incense', or using some kind of
electronic device that could make them sterilised and not be able
to reproduce babies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So we do not necessarily need to kill them to get rid of the pests.
Wisdom will be of good use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My Master taught - to develope Great Compassion one must start
by not harming, and protecting animals no matter how tiny they
are.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though these animals may be tiny - if you can kill small
animals, one day you might kill bigger animals, then killing humans
no longer seem a difficult task to do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:58:19 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6691189</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:54:55 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by i_luv_erky:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;I learned not to kill ant or even
mosquitoes.&lt;br /&gt;
But Aedes how?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If they Breed, we will bleed.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Up to you... honestly I still kill mosquitoes sometimes due to
reasons such as that you mentioned.. but know that every
unwholesome intentional action (which is 'bad karma') will lead to
unwholesome karmic effect in future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My dharma teacher got bitten by aedes, stayed in hospital for a
long time and at one point there was certain life dangers, but
still she refuses to kill a single mosquito to this day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure if everyone can be as 'extreme', or compassionate, as
her. We can try. In Japan, Zen monks have a practice at certain
times of a day, to let the mosquitoes in and be fed by their blood.
I think it is a great practice, though of course not so feasible in
our country with mosquitoes that spreads diseases around. But at
least you know the kind of compassion that true practitioners have
for these animals..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, my dharma teacher did mentioned before that if
lets say.. the dharma center was infested with pests and there is
no way but to get rid of them, she should shoulder the karma of
inviting pest controllers to get rid of them. Do note that one must
be ready to shoulder the karma, because there is definitely going
to be negative karmic effect from these... but sometimes its for
the greater good.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:54:55 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6691180</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:46:52 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by TWE:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;Wah eternal now i really very impressed
with your patience to type so many stuff here . Good work pal the
buddhist community needs pple like you &lt;img title="Very Happy" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_biggrin.gif" alt="Very Happy" /&gt; .
Frankly speaking i couldn't find the time to read every words that
you type .&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NP, anyway, read a post or two everyday, you'll finish reading
in no time &lt;img title="Wink" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_wink.gif" alt="Wink" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:46:52 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6691167</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by TWE @ Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:43:25 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Wah eternal now i really very impressed with your patience to
type so many stuff here . Good work pal the buddhist community
needs pple like you &lt;img title="Very Happy" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_biggrin.gif" alt="Very Happy" /&gt; .
Frankly speaking i couldn't find the time to read every words that
you type .&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:43:25 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6690959</guid>
      <author>TWE</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by i_luv_erky @ Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:31:20 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I learned not to kill ant or even mosquitoes.&lt;br /&gt;
But Aedes how?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If they Breed, we will bleed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:31:20 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6690890</guid>
      <author>i_luv_erky</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Mon, 07 May 2007 00:23:29 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;BTW forummers I understand some of my posts are hard to
understand.. or if there are any questions (don't have to worry
whether they are answered here or not) you can always ask in the
forum &lt;img title="Smile" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_smile.gif" alt="Smile" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 00:23:29 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6441214</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:19:17 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;How about a quick explaination of Karma in
Buddhist terms and in Hindu terms? &lt;img title="Laughing" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_lol.gif" alt="Laughing" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can take a look at &lt;a href=
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma#In_the_Dharmic_religions" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma#In_the_Dharmic_religions&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:19:17 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6386726</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by Herzog_Zwei @ Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:39:43 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;How about a quick explaination of Karma in Buddhist terms and in
Hindu terms? &lt;img title="Laughing" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_lol.gif" alt="Laughing" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:39:43 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6383979</guid>
      <author>Herzog_Zwei</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Wed, 04 Apr 2007 01:24:05 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;(continued from previous post)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We might conceive of this as compassion having gotten caught in
a loop, the loop of the illusion of duality. This is sort of like a
dog&#8217;s tail chasing itself. Pain and pleasure, suffering and
satisfaction always seem to be &#8220;over there.&#8221; Thus, when pleasant
sensations arise, there is a constant, compassionate, deluded
attempt to get over there to the other side of the imagined split.
This is fundamental attraction. You would think that we would just
stop imagining there is a split, but somehow that is not what
happens. We keep perpetuating the sense of a split even as we try
to bridge it, and so we suffer. When unpleasant sensations arise,
there is an attempt to get away from over there, to widen the
imagined split. This will never work, because it doesn&#8217;t actually
exist, but the way we hold our minds as we try to get away from
that side is painful. When boring or unpleasant sensations arise,
there is the attempt to tune out all together and forget the whole
thing, to try to pretend that the sensations on the other side of
the split are not there. This is fundamental ignorance and it
perpetuates the process, as it is by ignoring aspects of our
sensate reality that the illusion of a split is created in the
first place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These strict definitions of fundamental attraction, aversion and
ignorance are very important, particularly for when I discuss the
various models of the stages of enlightenment. Given the illusion,
it seems that somehow these mental reactions will help in a way
that will be permanent. Remember that the only thing that will
fundamentally help is to understand the Three Characteristics to
the degree that makes the difference, and the Three Characteristics
are manifesting right here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remember how it was stated above that suffering motivates
everything we do? We could also say that everything we do is
motivated by compassion, which is part of the fundamentally empty
nature of reality. That doesn&#8217;t mean that everything we do is
skillful; that is a whole different issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Compassion is a very good thing, especially when it involves one's
self and all beings. It is sort of the flip side of the Second
Noble Truth. The whole problem is that &#8220;misdirected&#8221; compassion,
compassion that is filtered through the process of ego and its
related habits, can produce enormous suffering and often does. It
is easy to think of many examples of people searching for happiness
in the strangest of places and by doing the strangest of things.
Just pick up any newspaper. The take-home message is to search for
happiness where you are actually likely to find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might say that compassion is the ultimate aspect of desire, or
think of compassion and desire on a continuum. The more wisdom or
understanding of interconnectedness there is behind our intentions
and actions, the more they reflect compassion and the more the
results will turn out well. The more greed, hatred and delusion or
lack of understanding of interconnectedness there is behind our
intentions and actions, the more they reflect desire and the more
suffering there will likely be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is sometimes referred to as the &#8220;Law of Karma,&#8221; where karma is
a word that has to do with our intentions and actions. Some people
can get all caught up in specifics of this that cannot possibly be
known, like speculating that if we kill a bug we will come back as
a bug and be squished. Don't. Cause and effect, also called
interdependence, is just too imponderably complex. Just use this
general concept to look honestly at what you want, why, and
precisely how you know this. Examine what the consequences of what
you do and think might be for yourself and everyone, and then take
responsibility for those consequences. It's a tall order and an
important practice to engage in, but don't get too obsessive about
it. Remember the simplicity of the first training, training in
kindness, generosity, honesty and clarity, and gain balance and
wisdom from the other two trainings as you go.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes looking into suffering and desire can be overwhelming.
Life can sometimes be extremely hard. In these moments, try looking
into the heart side of the equation, compassion and kindness.
Connect with the part of your heart that just wishes the suffering
would end and feel that deeply, especially as it manifests in the
body. Just this can be profound practice. There are also lots of
other good techniques for cultivating a spaciousness of heart that
can bear anything, such as formal loving-kindness practices (see
Sharon Salzburg&#8217;s excellent &lt;span style=
"text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Loving-kindness, The Revolutionary
Art of Happiness&lt;/span&gt;). Finding them and practicing them can make
the spiritual path much more bearable and pleasant, and this can
make it more likely that we will be able to persevere, gain deep
insights, be able to integrate them into our lives, and use them to
benefit others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The take-home message is to take the desire to be happy and free of
suffering and use its energy to do skillful things that can
actually make this happen, rather than getting caught in old
unexamined patterns of searching for happiness where you know you
will not find it. The Three Trainings are skillful and can inform
the whole of our life. By following them we may come to the end of
many forms of suffering and be in a much better position to help
others do the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;TRUTH NUMBER THREE: THE END OF SUFFERING&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This brings us nicely to the Third Noble Truth, &lt;strong&gt;the end of
suffering&lt;/strong&gt;. Now, as noted before, there are three types of
suffering pertaining to the scope of each of the three trainings.
Traditionally, the Buddha talked about the end of suffering as
relating to mastering the third training and thus becoming highly
enlightened. The first point is that it can be done and is done
today by meditators like you from many spiritual traditions. Yes,
there are enlightened people walking around, and not just a rare
few that have spent 20 years in a cave in Tibet. This is really
important to understand and have faith in. The other point is that
with the end of fundamental desire, which we will render here as
the end of compassion and reality being filtered through the odd
logic of the process of ego, there is the end of fundamental
suffering. That's it. Done is what has to be done. Gone, gone, gone
beyond, and all of that. All beings can do it, and there is, to
make bit of a mystical joke, no time like the present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, it must be said that the Buddha also praised those who had
mastered the other two trainings and thus eliminated what suffering
could be eliminated by those methods. Even very enlightened beings
can benefit from mastering the concentration states. However, there
are some complex and difficult issues related to eliminating all of
the ordinary suffering in the world and thus related to mastering
the first training, which is an endless undertaking. It is because
of this particular issue that such teachings as the Bodhisattva Vow
arose, and I will deal with these complexities towards the end of
this book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;TRUTH NUMBER FOUR: THE PATH&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fourth Noble Truth is the &lt;strong&gt;Noble Eightfold Path that
leads to suffering's final end&lt;/strong&gt;. Another list! Hopefully
you have come to like these little lists by now, and so one more
will hopefully be seen as another manageable little guide on how to
find the end of suffering. Luckily, we have already seen the whole
of the Noble Eightfold Path in other parts of some of the other
lists, and it is summarized in the Three Trainings of morality,
concentration and wisdom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The morality section is just broken down into three specifics:
skillful action, skillful speech and skillful livelihood. Skillful
means conducive to the end of suffering for us and for all other
living beings. Be kind, honest, clear and compassionate in your
whole life, in your actions, speech and work. Notice that nothing
is excluded here. The more of our lives we integrate with the
spiritual path, the better. Simple to remember and also a powerful
guide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The concentration section contains three things we saw in the Five
Spiritual Faculties and the Seven Factors of Enlightenment:
skillful energy, skillful concentration, and skillful
mindfulness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wisdom section has the two last parts of the path: skillful
thought or intention and skillful understanding or wisdom. These
two are often rendered in different ways, but the meaning is the
same: understand the truth of your experience and aspire to
kindness and wisdom in your thoughts and deeds. Again, simple but
powerful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 01:24:05 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6264182</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Wed, 04 Apr 2007 01:18:59 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sharing more detailed, indepth understanding of the Four Noble
Truths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following taken from 'Mastering the Core Teachings of the Buddha',
written by a modern day Arhat, Dharma Dan (source: &lt;a href=
"http://www.interactivebuddha.com/mctb.html" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;http://www.interactivebuddha.com/mctb.html&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;9. THE FOUR NOBLE TRUTHS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Four Noble Truths, &lt;strong&gt;suffering, its cause, its end, and
the path that leads to its end&lt;/strong&gt;, are fundamental to the
teachings of the Buddha. He was fond of summarizing his whole
teaching in terms of them. Actually, when asked to be really
concise, he would just say the first and third: suffering and the
end of suffering. This was what he taught. Like the other little
lists here, they have great profundity on many levels and are worth
exploring in depth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;TRUTH NUMBER ONE: SUFFERING&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first truth is the truth of &lt;strong&gt;suffering&lt;/strong&gt;. Hey,
didn't we just see that in the Three Characteristics? Yes! Isn't
that great! We also just saw it in The Three Trainings Revisited.
There must have been something important about it for it to start
off something called the Four Noble Truths that is not immediately
obvious. Why do we practice? Suffering, that's why! It is just that
simple. Why do we do anything? Suffering!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plenty of people balk at this, and say that they do lots of things
because of reasons other than suffering. I suppose that to be
really correct I should add in ignorance and habit, but these are
intimately connected to suffering. This is worth investigating in
depth. Perhaps there is something more to this first truth that
they may have missed on first inspection, as it is a deep and
subtle teaching. Actually, to understand this first truth is to
understand the whole of the spiritual path, so take the time to
investigate it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The basic gist of the truth from a relative point of view is that
we want things to be other than they are, and this causes pain. We
want things that are nice to be permanent, we want to get what we
want and avoid what we don't want. We wish bad things would go
faster than they do, and these are all contrary to reality. We all
die, get sick, have conflicts, and constantly seem to be running
around either trying to get something (greed), get away from
something (hatred), or tune out from reality all together
(delusion). We are never perfectly happy with things just as they
are. These are the traditional, relative ways in which suffering is
explained, but these definitions can only take us so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the most fundamental level, the level that is the most useful
for doing insight practices, we wish desperately that there was
some separate, permanent self, and we spend huge amounts of time
doing our best to prop up this illusion. In order to do this, we
habitually ignore lots of useful information about our reality and
give our mental impressions and simplifications of reality much
more importance than they are necessarily due. It is this illusion
that adds a problematic element to the normal and understandable
ways in which we go about trying to be happy. We constantly
struggle with reality because we misunderstand it, i.e. because
reality misunderstands itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;So what's new?&#8221; one might say. Good point! It isn't new, is it?
This has been the whole of our life! The big question is &#8220;Is there
some understanding which makes a difference?&#8221; Yes, or we wouldn't
be bothering with all of this spirituality stuff. Somewhere down in
our being there is a little voice that cries, &#8220;There is another
way!&#8221; We can find this other way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connecting with the truth of suffering can actually be very
motivating for spiritual practice. Most traditional talks on the
Buddha's teachings begin with this. More than just being motivating
for spiritual practice, tuning into suffering is spiritual
practice! Many people start meditating and then get frustrated with
how much suffering and pain they experience, never knowing that
they are actually starting to understand something. They cling to
the ideal that insight practices will produce peace and bliss and
yet much of what they find is suffering. They don&#8217;t realize that
things on the cushion tend to get worse before they get better.
Thus, they reject the very truths they must deeply understand to
obtain the peace they were looking for and thus get nowhere. They
reject their own valid insights that they have obtained through
valid practice. I suspect that this is one of the greatest and most
common stumbling blocks on the spiritual path.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a flip side to suffering which can help, and that is
compassion, the wish for there to not be suffering. Wherever there
is suffering there is compassion, though most of the time somewhat
twisted by the confused logic of the process of ego. More on this
in a bit, but it leads directly to the second Noble Truth, the
cause of suffering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;TRUTH NUMBER TWO: &#8220;DESIRE&#8221;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Second Noble Truth is that the &lt;strong&gt;cause of suffering is
desire&lt;/strong&gt;, also rendered as craving or attachment. We want
things to be other than they are because we perceive the world
through the odd logic of the process of ego, through the illusion
of the split of the perceiver and the perceived. We might say, &#8220;Of
course we want things to be great and not unpleasant! What do you
expect?&#8221; The problem isn't actually quite in the desire for things
to be good and not be bad in the way that we might think; it is, in
fact, just a bit subtler than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a really slippery business, and many people can get all
into craving for non-craving and desiring non-attachment. This can
be useful if it is done wisely and it is actually all we have to
work with. If common sense is ignored, however, desiring
non-attachment may produce neurotic, self-righteous, repressed
ascetics instead of balanced, kind meditators. A tour of any
monastery or spiritual community will likely expose you to clear
examples of both sides of this delicate balance. So, don't make too
much of a problem out of the fact that it seems that one must
desire something in order to seek it. This paradox will resolve
itself if we are able to experience reality in this moment
clearly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;Craving,&#8221; &#8220;attachment,&#8221; and &#8220;desire&#8221; are some of the most
dangerous words that can be used to describe something that is
actually much more fundamental than these seem to indicate. The
Buddha did talk about these conventional forms of suffering, but he
also talked about the fundamental suffering that comes from some
deep longing for a refuge that involves a separate or permanent
self. We imagine that such a self will be a refuge, and so we
desire such a self, we try to make certain sensations into such a
self, we cling to the fundamental notion that such a self can exist
as a stable entity and that this will somehow help. The side
effects of this manifest in all sorts of additions to mind states
and emotions that are not helpful, but these are side effects and
not the root that cause of suffering that the Buddha was pointing
to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As stated earlier, a helpful concept here is compassion, a heart
aspect of the practice and reality related to kindness. You see,
wherever there is desire there is suffering, and wherever there is
suffering there is compassion, the desire for the end of suffering.
You can actually experience this. So obviously there is some really
close relationship between suffering, desire and compassion. This
is heavy but good stuff and worth investigating.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 01:18:59 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6264140</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:53:00 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by Eric Cartman:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;Some dumbfcuk, upon hearing i was into
buddhism, went to set up a taoist medium place and claimed that a
deity "psychicly" knew my name and etc, and wanted to meet me up.
Then he proceeded to tell me all the wrong info lol, and he still
had the galls to tell me to go there frequently to offer some
incense LOL!&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img title="Shocked" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_eek.gif" alt="Shocked" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:53:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6241498</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:50:51 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by cycle:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;Hi AEN,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have been reading your various posts for the past few days and I
just want to let you know that you are a great Dharma teacher for
me!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm very impressed with your comprehensive knowlege in the Dharma
given your young age. I've taken refuge under the Triple Gem since
age 20 and have been studying the Dharma whenever I can, but am
still very ignorant. Bad karma. &lt;img title="Embarassed" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_redface.gif" alt=
"Embarassed" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've also met many Buddhists distorting or totally misconstrue the
actual meanings of the Dharma, even after going through Dharma
classes themselves! Some even look down on the Sangha or other
monastic places, mostly due to self delusion of one's ( false)
intelligence. This is indeed the ending of Dharma era.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your answers to many doubts and queries, challenges included, are
clear and accurate with lots of references and links. I'm
especially impressed with your wisdom and patience excercised when
dealing with forumers out to put you or Buddhism down. My kudos to
you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wish that there will be more young Buddhists like you, then there
is hope for Singapore Buddhism. &lt;img title="Smile" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_smile.gif" alt="Smile" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking forward to your postings. Jia you!&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your compliment... but what I know and my experience
is also very limited.. &lt;img title="Embarassed" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_redface.gif" alt="Embarassed" /&gt; so
I have also much to learn from others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And welcome to the forum &lt;img title="Very Happy" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=
"Very Happy" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:50:51 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6241488</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by Eric Cartman @ Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:41:04 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Some dumbfcuk, upon hearing i was into buddhism, went to set up
a taoist medium place and claimed that a deity "psychicly" knew my
name and etc, and wanted to meet me up. Then he proceeded to tell
me all the wrong info lol, and he still had the galls to tell me to
go there frequently to offer some incense LOL!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a lot of other forehead-smacking things like that that I
don't even bother to talk about anymore, because the
misunderstanding has already gone too deep for salvation due to a
group of dumbasses.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:41:04 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6250283</guid>
      <author>Eric Cartman</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by cycle @ Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:32:57 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi AEN,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have been reading your various posts for the past few days and I
just want to let you know that you are a great Dharma teacher for
me!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm very impressed with your comprehensive knowlege in the Dharma
given your young age. I've taken refuge under the Triple Gem since
age 20 and have been studying the Dharma whenever I can, but am
still very ignorant. Bad karma. &lt;img title="Embarassed" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_redface.gif" alt=
"Embarassed" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've also met many Buddhists distorting or totally misconstrue the
actual meanings of the Dharma, even after going through Dharma
classes themselves! Some even look down on the Sangha or other
monastic places, mostly due to self delusion of one's ( false)
intelligence. This is indeed the ending of Dharma era.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your answers to many doubts and queries, challenges included, are
clear and accurate with lots of references and links. I'm
especially impressed with your wisdom and patience excercised when
dealing with forumers out to put you or Buddhism down. My kudos to
you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wish that there will be more young Buddhists like you, then there
is hope for Singapore Buddhism. &lt;img title="Smile" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_smile.gif" alt="Smile" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking forward to your postings. Jia you!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:32:57 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6241399</guid>
      <author>cycle</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:24:39 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by Dan008:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;In Buddhism, there are no required of
burning joss stick or papers for the dead. Only prayers will do.
Somehow chinese like to mix the Toaist way with the Buddist way.
Buddist - practice on one's mind, only take what is needed. We do
not need to kill in order to live. Besides killing is a circle,
never ending. Thats why we need to get out of this "circle of life
and death". And we are not idol worshipers for sure, the idol of
Buddha is there for us to remind ourselves of the correct path to
enlightenment and not for us to pray for blessing and 4D... please
stop doing all these. And we bow is becuase to show our respect to
the great Buddha not to worship him. Don't understand why some
temples still have joss stick there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please understand your/our religion.&lt;br /&gt;
Correct me if I am wrong, as I am only human.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Your post is quite well said... there are a few points I would
like to post. Burning papers for the dead is not a Buddhist
practise... in Buddhism, we dedicate merits through offering the
Sangha (monastic community) and Pujas (i.e Ullambana Pujas
performed during 7th month includes chanting Ullambana Sutra and
Ksitigarbha Sutra) to the dead in hope they can be reborn in better
realms, but we do not believe that burning any papers will have any
helps on the deceased. It is more of a Chinese cultural practise or
religious Taoism practise. Also see about the myth of Ghost
Festival: &lt;a href="http://www.jenchen.org.sg/vol5no1a.htm" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;Ullambana Dharma - Not Festival Of Hungry
Ghosts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What "circle" or "cycle of life and death" means in Buddhism, is
that sentient beings are constantly being reborn in Samsara - the
world of sufferings. They are always reborn again and again in the
6 realms of existence in samsara, according to their karma.
Samsaric existence is full of pain and sufferings, even in the
Human Existence we have to go through Birth, Ageing, Sickness and
Death, and &lt;a href="http://www.jenchen.org.sg/vol4no1a.htm" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;the eight distresses&lt;/a&gt;. But even if you are born in a
royal family, or even in the celestial/heaven realms, samsaric
pleasures are still disatisfactory because of its
transiency/impermanence... and by attaching to these transient
pleasures thinking they are real and truly existent, permanent, we
create even more sufferings. We suffer as we do not know that all
compounded phenomena are empty of inherent, permanent, separate
existence... and that all arises out of conditions and are always
transient. Therefore the Buddha taught that suffering and
disatisfactoriness is a fundamental truth in life (i.e first noble
truth), however he also teaches the cause of suffering and the
solution (second, third, fourth noble truth), the path leading to
the liberation from these sufferings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sentient beings cannot become liberated from samsara because they
are tied down by the bondage of their ignorance and karmic
propensities... due to an illusion of duality (means subject-object
separation) or a false sense of self, sentient beings are
constantly grasping on things and craving for samsaric pleasures
and existence, thus undergoing never ending suffering. Not only are
we being reborn lifetime are lifetime, we are constantly reborn
moment after moment even in this very life. This is because of our
illusion and attachment to our 'self' and our sentient thoughts
(our identification and attachment to thoughts and things caused by
ignorance), and the process of identification with a 'self' is
continued without an ending until we attain insights and
enlightenment. To gain these insights we have to practise the
eightfold path in our lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So therefore in Buddhism, Buddha showed us the path leading to the
complete ending of all sufferings, finding the abiding purity and
bliss of Nirvana, to become liberated from the cycle of rebirth in
Samsara. Buddha taught that the Buddhas of past and future all
teach Buddhism as "avoid all evil, doing all good, and purifying
the mind". Most religions only teach "avoid all evil and doing all
good", but only Buddhism teaches about liberation and the
purification of the mind. The problem with just "avoiding all evil
and doing all good" is that as a result we accumulate a lot of good
karma and avoid creating bad karma, meaning we can be reborn in the
higher realms or even the celestial realms like the heavens,
however we still cannot attain nirvana, we cannot be liberated from
the cycle of samsara.. and our enjoyment in these higher realms are
also limited and transient. Similarly as described just now even if
our lives are very good, there is still bound to be
unsatisfactoriness and sufferings.. if we cannot be liberated
moment to moment. Therefore when we practise Buddhism, also we
practise purification of the mind... through mindfulness we become
aware of and disidentify from all our sentient thoughts, our
habitual tendencies of the mind, the afflictive emotions and so on
due to identification with a false sense of self, and the
identification is also known as the false 'ego'. Our Buddha Nature
is like a clear mirror, our pure awareness, which unfortunately is
obscured from us because of a layer of dust, or mental defilements.
Through Buddhism we clean the mirror of its defilements to reveal
the clear bright mirror underneath. Therefore through practising
Buddhism we gain insights into the nature of reality, the nature of
our minds, our Buddha Nature, and through awakening from our
delusions we find the nirvanic bliss of clarity and liberation from
all sufferings in our lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're right about bowing as respect and not worship or praying for
worldly favours. Buddhism is perhaps the only religion out there
that truly goes beyond forms and idols (see: &lt;a href=
"http://www.jenchen.org.sg/vol7no4c.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Buddhism is
truly detached from idols&lt;/a&gt;) As for joss stick, offering incense
is a practise since the times of Buddha in India, carried on to
various places (not only Chinese offer incense, the Tibetan
Buddhists and Theravada Buddhist like Sri Lankans, Burma etc also
offer incense). In general, incense fragrance represents the
fragrance of Dao De. And the incense we burn during religious
ceremonies and Pujas, chanting sessions are usually very very good
quality incense -- their fragrance can permeate the entire room...
not just the normal joss sticks most people use. Offering incense
is not a must when we visit Buddhist monasteries.. usually I just
put my hands together as a gesture of respect. If you are immoral,
you can offer a lot of joss sticks and there is no use. There is
also no point offering incense everywhere in the monastery making
the entire place totally smokey &lt;img title="Mr. Green" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_mrgreen.gif" alt="Mr. Green" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:24:39 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6250256</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:51:25 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by Dan008:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;Most of the Chinese in Singapore who
accepted Christianity are the weathly and english educated. I am
not saying Christianity is bad or something just that I feel that
these "weathly Singaporean Chinese" who they thinks that by
accepting Christianity and go to church every weekend with their
big BMWs and Mecs and speaks english all the way and dress up just
to go church. Do they really understand what is going to a church?
Instead of going to church to know more about Christianity and
understanding it, they focus more on being "happy" and going to
heaven! If one day Jesus says no one goes to Heaven, will these
people still help others and so call pray for them? You see they
are using "going to heaven" as a reward method, as no one wants to
go to hell. If Jesus ask you this question, in order to save more
people from going to hell, you have to go to hell. Will one do it?
This is question people should ask themselves first. Willing to
sacrifice oneself in order to help others. Just like what Jesus
did. Did he die because he can go to heaven? (Need not to say he is
the son of god).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would says it must come from the heart if you really wanna help
others. And ask for no rewards.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hmm thanks for sharing your views... but.. no comments and dont
want to offend any Christians here &lt;img title="Mr. Green" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_mrgreen.gif" alt=
"Mr. Green" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually a large proportion of true Buddhists in Singapore are also
wealthy and english educated.. but when we take into account those
who considers themselves as Buddhists even though they are not
really Buddhists (to become a Buddhist one must first take refuge
in the Three Treasures: Buddha, Dharma and Sangha) nor do they know
about the teachings of Buddhism... meaning those following the
Chinese folk traditions and are usually the elderlies who many of
them are not very well educated... then of course Christians become
comparitively more 'educated' and 'wealthy' within Singapore.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:51:25 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6238902</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by Dan008 @ Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:27:45 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In Buddhism, there are no required of burning joss stick or
papers for the dead. Only prayers will do. Somehow chinese like to
mix the Toaist way with the Buddist way. Buddist - practice on
one's mind, only take what is needed. We do not need to kill in
order to live. Besides killing is a circle, never ending. Thats why
we need to get out of this "circle of life and death". And we are
not idol worshipers for sure, the idol of Buddha is there for us to
remind ourselves of the correct path to enlightenment and not for
us to pray for blessing and 4D... please stop doing all these. And
we bow is becuase to show our respect to the great Buddha not to
worship him. Don't understand why some temples still have joss
stick there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please understand your/our religion.&lt;br /&gt;
Correct me if I am wrong, as I am only human.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:27:45 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6236034</guid>
      <author>Dan008</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by Dan008 @ Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:18:00 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most of the Chinese in Singapore who accepted Christianity are
the weathly and english educated. I am not saying Christianity is
bad or something just that I feel that these "weathly Singaporean
Chinese" who they thinks that by accepting Christianity and go to
church every weekend with their big BMWs and Mecs and speaks
english all the way and dress up just to go church. Do they really
understand what is going to a church? Instead of going to church to
know more about Christianity and understanding it, they focus more
on being "happy" and going to heaven! If one day Jesus says no one
goes to Heaven, will these people still help others and so call
pray for them? You see they are using "going to heaven" as a reward
method, as no one wants to go to hell. If Jesus ask you this
question, in order to save more people from going to hell, you have
to go to hell. Will one do it? This is question people should ask
themselves first. Willing to sacrifice oneself in order to help
others. Just like what Jesus did. Did he die because he can go to
heaven? (Need not to say he is the son of god).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would says it must come from the heart if you really wanna help
others. And ask for no rewards.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:18:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6235989</guid>
      <author>Dan008</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by Taiwanpolitics @ Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:24:47 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;buddha rox !!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:24:47 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6158343</guid>
      <author>Taiwanpolitics</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by An Eternal Now @ Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:47:57 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by redstone:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;Looks like i've got lots of reading up to
do.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Happy reading &lt;img title="Very Happy" src=
"/images/emoticons/classic/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=
"Very Happy" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:47:57 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6146716</guid>
      <author>An Eternal Now</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Buddhism ~ For Non-Buddhists and Buddhists replied by redstone @ Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:17:18 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like i&#8217;ve got lots of reading up to do.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:17:18 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:1728:240316:6144641</guid>
      <author>redstone</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1728/topics/240316</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
