explain why dogs hump people's legs thenOriginally posted by Guest_111:You're taking my point all the way to outer space.
We all know why China has a population problem, it's got more to do with the male chauvinistic/sexist ideas of the Chinese culture. Give birth until you get a boy.
My point is that homosexuality is un-natural even from a scientific point of view. If it wasn't then male-male or female-female relations should bear 'fruit', should it not? Like I said, homosexuality is a product of society not nature. Look at animals without "social skills", you do see male dogs humping on male dogs, do you? Their function to reproduce wouldn't work very well, would it?
Man to dog: Let's do it tonight? What style do you want?Originally posted by hisoka:if the dogs agree to it(assuming this cna be proven) without coercion etc why not?
did you perhaps forget to read my words in bracket? the point i was making was that IF the dog agees and it can be proven the dog agrees whats wrong with thatOriginally posted by iveco:Man to dog: Let's do it tonight? What style do you want?
Dog: Woof.
So what is that supposed to mean? Yes or no?
Dogs only know one word, and that is "Woof!" We can't tell if they are saying yes or no to our requests. How can we prove that the dog has agreed to sex?Originally posted by hisoka:did you perhaps forget to read my words in bracket? the point i was making was that IF the dog agees and it can be proven the dog agrees whats wrong with that
whoever wants to have sex with dog will have to figure it out.Originally posted by iveco:Dogs only know one word, and that is "Woof!" We can't tell if they are saying yes or no to our requests. How can we prove that the dog has agreed to sex?
Originally posted by Guest_111:Don't think you can leave out religion here. It's the bases for most people who don't think homosexuality is right. What other ways would you like to look at it?
From a practical (scientific) point of view, Homosexuality is no good either. Such a union does not contribute to the population. You're more likely to see a bigger gap in your age groups.
Social evloution, a little, yes. It also shows the results from the darker side of our society leaving behind moral ethics and values. Homosexuality is a result of social environments in many cases (i'd like to believe all of them but I know many would disagree). It could be just me but the people who I have met or actually known who are or have been or thought about being gays and or lesbians became so only after a traumatic event (plus gradual events leading up to), not so great home life (single parent, unhappy and fighting parents), stress or were rebelling against the 'strict social order'. I know some scientists have tried to prove that it's in the DNA but from my personal experience, I don't buy it one bit.
Now that everyone knows where I stand, I just like to add that no I don't believe in condeming anyone for whatever choices they make. Especially, in the name of God. He's the judge and well, none of us are part of the jury. It does say in the bible to love the sinner and hate the sin. For those who dislike gays and lesbians, show a little love. If I am right (which I think I am here *read above), love is just something that missing here.
I do agree..basically gaysim bascially are harmless. What harms are the people itself. Be it straight/bi/gay..some are really irritating to the core. My gf was persuited by this guy and despite thousands of rejections from her..he still persist on until we have to call the police. Long story.Originally posted by HENG@:ya those who dunno how to take no as a no who are irritating. be they gay, straight or bi or whatever, they're all irritating. and especially some people of a certain religion who keep pushing it and also dunno how to take no as a no. the most irritating sort of people on earth.
next time give them one tight slap then they know.![]()
Scientifically, it's proven that babies born under incest r/s have a high chance of being abnormal at birth. Why involve a young innocent life for peer pleasure? Homosexuality is different. I don't think you'll be able to get pregnant when both are of equal sex. Only way to get a child is either for the gays to adopt a child or for the lesbians to go for artificial insertion of seman. Either way, that won't affect the child physically and chances for the child to grow up healthly is high.Originally posted by Glen999:if incest is not allowed, how can homosexuality be forgiven? (just for the sake of argument)
Argument: if you are open minded and you are open on homosexuality, then you must be open for incest. For me, homo and incest are under the same category.
how about a case of incest ... and the brother/sister told society that they will not have baby.Originally posted by laosu:Scientifically, it's proven that babies born under incest r/s have a high chance of being abnormal at birth. Why involve a young innocent life for peer pleasure? Homosexuality is different. I don't think you'll be able to get pregnant when both are of equal sex. Only way to get a child is either for the gays to adopt a child or for the lesbians to go for artificial insertion of seman. Either way, that won't affect the child physically and chances for the child to grow up healthly is high.
I don't approve of incest in anyway.
I totally agree... who cares what people do in their own private bedroom as long as they don't affect others people life. It is much better than killers, people who start wars, adulters, toturers etc.... if they are ok with having sex with whatever thing that is but as long as nobody is affected (including family), it's ok....Originally posted by Glen999:whoever wants to have sex with dog will have to figure it out.
lesbian, gay, incest, dog sex, i don't care as long as they don't have impact on other people's life....
point say east you go and talkabout west cum lan out of point oneOriginally posted by iveco:Dogs only know one word, and that is "Woof!" We can't tell if they are saying yes or no to our requests. How can we prove that the dog has agreed to sex?
I think you are quoting from the Book of Leviticus..Originally posted by Glen999:if incest is not allowed, how can homosexuality be forgiven? (just for the sake of argument)
Argument: if you are open minded and you are open on homosexuality, then you must be open for incest. For me, homo and incest are under the same category.
Let's talk about Science then.. In ancient world, before we become human beings (hey, do you believe in Evolution in the first place?), our anchestors stay in a Polygamic societies.. So, do you want to revert back to that society? One alpha male can get access to many females.. and the other males will get no females at all.. In fact, such arrangements can still be seen in the animal kingdom..Originally posted by Guest_111:You're taking my point all the way to outer space.
We all know why China has a population problem, it's got more to do with the male chauvinistic/sexist ideas of the Chinese culture. Give birth until you get a boy.
My point is that homosexuality is un-natural even from a scientific point of view. If it wasn't then male-male or female-female relations should bear 'fruit', should it not? Like I said, homosexuality is a product of society not nature. Look at animals without "social skills", you do see male dogs humping on male dogs, do you? Their function to reproduce wouldn't work very well, would it?
I'm very sure God will destroy sodom and gomorrah even if the 2 angels who went to sodom and gomorrah were only the fairer genders.. The very act of wanting to have sex with someone who's unwilling is a crime..Originally posted by Deportivo:the famous story of sodom and gomorrah.
This is one of the most interesting argument. Something that buffled me for a long time.. But then, we know that homosexuals were present since time memorial, and why didn't the traits of homosexuality get stamped out?Originally posted by Guest_111:I think the only peoplle who can love a bit more unconditionally are the parents of the gays and lesbians who happen to be str8 or else they wouldn't be born in the first place.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4352011/Originally posted by Guest_111:Like I said, homosexuality is a product of society not nature. Look at animals without "social skills", you do see male dogs humping on male dogs, do you? Their function to reproduce wouldn't work very well, would it?
Bigger age gap? Isn't it because the straights are not producing as much as they used to? But how would being gay be immoral? Just like all Jews are immoral to you? Or 200 years ago when Niggers are treated as a sub-class of human beings?Originally posted by Guest_111:Don't think you can leave out religion here. It's the bases for most people who don't think homosexuality is right. What other ways would you like to look at it?
From a practical (scientific) point of view, Homosexuality is no good either. Such a union does not contribute to the population. You're more likely to see a bigger gap in your age groups.
Social evloution, a little, yes. It also shows the results from the darker side of our society leaving behind moral ethics and values. Homosexuality is a result of social environments in many cases (i'd like to believe all of them but I know many would disagree). It could be just me but the people who I have met or actually known who are or have been or thought about being gays and or lesbians became so only after a traumatic event (plus gradual events leading up to), not so great home life (single parent, unhappy and fighting parents), stress or were rebelling against the 'strict social order'. I know some scientists have tried to prove that it's in the DNA but from my personal experience, I don't buy it one bit.
Now that everyone knows where I stand, I just like to add that no I don't believe in condeming anyone for whatever choices they make. Especially, in the name of God. He's the judge and well, none of us are part of the jury. It does say in the bible to love the sinner and hate the sin. For those who dislike gays and lesbians, show a little love. If I am right (which I think I am here *read above), love is just something that missing here.
What rubbish is this? China's population is growing because people are chauvanistic and sexist and so they give birth till they get a boy???Originally posted by Guest_111:We all know why China has a population problem, it's got more to do with the male chauvinistic/sexist ideas of the Chinese culture. Give birth until you get a boy.
if it's not "power" play, then it's not morally wrong loh!!! by the way, your 'power' play is called 'rape' too.Originally posted by earthlings73:I think you are quoting from the Book of Leviticus..
In the same book, if you are willing to read more carefully, it also says that the eating of shrimps, sotong, clams, as forbidden.. So do u still eat those?
I guess at the end of the day, we will just need to understand the principles between what's right and what's wrong. Instead of following closely everything the Book has to say..
As for Incest, there's usually a "power" play.. e.g., mom and son, father and daughter.. and the victims usually do not have power to act against the pepretrator.. Hence, it's morally wrong..
so as incest lor?! as long as they don't have baby.Originally posted by laosu:Put it this way...if god is the one who created one and condemns homosexuality..then in the first place there shouldn't be two genders and simply just have one cause then there won't be such problems. Anyway I don't see it as a problem.
It's just about minority vs majority. Put it this way..if in the first place, it's was a "rule" that male should only date and marry male and same for female..then the so call str8 now are the one being condemn, what will be everyone's reaction? I guess it'll be much about the same.
Anyway, we are just human, who are we to judge other people when we are of equal species? Gay or Straight, we are all humans.
If we are talking more into science medically, then I can tell you that AIDS doesn't just associate with homosexuality anymore.
You can go fark dogs for all I care and be assured that I won't condemn you. The only thing I don't like is the act of farking a dog, not the people who do it. Same for those who bonk their sisters.Originally posted by hisoka:point say east you go and talkabout west cum lan out of point one
how about people who screw italian buses?Originally posted by iveco:You can go fark dogs for all I care and be assured that I won't condemn you. The only thing I don't like is the act of farking a dog, not the people who do it. Same for those who bonk their sisters.
You actually believe all that crap? OMG!Originally posted by HENG@:how about people who screw italian buses?![]()