i have been road hogging for 11 years,Originally posted by so_nice:hmm...u just kanna summon for road hogging izzit?![]()
lol, we'll see if that really happens, but have u ever think, what will happen if i'm eventually able to brake safely to a halt in time and avoid banging into you, you are underestimating my reaction, anyway god bless you, the surveilance camera got your stunts, be prepared to answer that to the traffic policeOriginally posted by parryhotter:Try me lah. I'll overtake you on the second lane and I'll abruptly cut into your lane (1st lane) and then I'll jam my brakes to purposely let you bang my behind and we'll see who more 'guai lan'...
Don't underestimate my ability to make you not stop in timeOriginally posted by Tomas_Rosicko:lol, we'll see if that really happens, but have u ever think, what will happen if i'm eventually able to brake safely to a halt in time and avoid banging into you, you are underestimating my reaction, anyway god bless you, the surveilance camera got your stunts, be prepared to answer that to the traffic police
I'm just going by the repetitive nature of your writing here, but, uh, you wouldn't happen to be intellectually disabled, would you? It kinda sounds like, "My unca told me to stay here, and I'm gonna stay here, because my unca told me to stay here, so I must stay here", know what I mean?Originally posted by Tomas_Rosicko:i love road hogging, road hogging is fun, tailgating is dangerous, road hogging is not dangerous. Road hoggers vs tail gaters, tailgaters vs road hoggers, when a collision happens between a road hogger and a tailgater, the tailgater is at fault, cos he bangs the road hogger from behind
tailgating is dangerous, i hate tailgaters, tailgaters are vulnerable to traffic collisons
Hogging the extreme left lane is so fun meh? The trucks... btw, have speed limit of... 60kmh?Originally posted by Tomas_Rosicko:i have been road hogging for 11 years,
haven't got involved in any traffic collisions, never kenna demerit points or traffic fines before
Agreed.Originally posted by alberteinstein:I seen a motorcyclist riding at 100km/h on 1st lane. That is not considered hogging. A merc was right behind him, tailgating him. The motorcyclist sensed it and went faster, only to have that bloody merc also gone faster, STILL tailgating him. Hope you are aware that if he was to ride at 100km/h on 2nd lane, he would be blocked by many "hoggers". But riding on 1st lane at 100km/h, I wouldn't consider he was hogging. But he got tailgated so dangerously by that merc. Can you see it???
There is no need to tailgate. If you want, ovetake! Why tailgate? The threadstarter may be inconsiderate, but he pointed out rightly the FACT that tailgating is more dangerouls than hogging. As for ppl who says cut infront and jam brake, why do that? Someone who is inconsiderate doesn't warrant such treatment. If you dun like him, overtake him!!
If someone is is a hurry, like sending ppl to hospital, you can always overtake roadhoggers. There are plenty of considerate drivers around the road. There is NEVER a need to tailgate or hate roadhoggers.
Sorry, Road hogging is not stupid. Clever people don't tailgate, cos they won't get anything out of itOriginally posted by Kr0n:You know, I don't think any of us should bother replying to posts like these. Dicks like him are just out to post something stupid to rile us all up just for the fun of it. I would love to see him get stuck in a traffic jam during an emergency.
Instead of adding credibility and recognition to his topic by replying, I think it'll be much better if we'd just ignore all these stupid posts by ostentatiously stupid people.
TR: Keep the genes to yourself, thank you. Don't spread them at all.![]()
the bike can juz give way and let the merc overtake...after the merc overtake he can go back to the 1st lane...thats the way...for pple with vehicle..the main purpose to own 1 is so that it can ferry u from point a to point b in a faster way...if u like travelling at 70 km/hr...then go lane 2...dun block pples way n time by travelling in lane 1....if ure on 90km/hr...u saw a fast car behind...give way lah...after it overtake,u can go back to ur lane mah...u nv know if its sending pple to the hospital or wat mah...Originally posted by alberteinstein:I seen a motorcyclist riding at 100km/h on 1st lane. That is not considered hogging. A merc was right behind him, tailgating him. The motorcyclist sensed it and went faster, only to have that bloody merc also gone faster, STILL tailgating him. Hope you are aware that if he was to ride at 100km/h on 2nd lane, he would be blocked by many "hoggers". But riding on 1st lane at 100km/h, I wouldn't consider he was hogging. But he got tailgated so dangerously by that merc. Can you see it???
There is no need to tailgate. If you want, ovetake! Why tailgate? The threadstarter may be inconsiderate, but he pointed out rightly the FACT that tailgating is more dangerouls than hogging. As for ppl who says cut infront and jam brake, why do that? Someone who is inconsiderate doesn't warrant such treatment. If you dun like him, overtake him!!
If someone is is a hurry, like sending ppl to hospital, you can always overtake roadhoggers. There are plenty of considerate drivers around the road. There is NEVER a need to tailgate or hate roadhoggers.
I have to agree with you on this one.. our speed limit is 90KM.. yes.. but if someone comes behind you at 110KM.. you should give way and later go behind him/her if you wish to continue on the first lane... no point irritating yourself and the other driver and getting into an accident...Originally posted by guitarman1:As I posted in the other thread, wat constitutes Road Hogging??
If you travel 130 on rite lane, and a guy come 160 behind you, you are a hog rite?? U should give way to him rite?
But don't you find it incovenient, at tat speed, to move back to middle lane so that the irritating speedster (160 guy) can pass?
The 90kmh ppl feel exactly the same way. Except that they are observing the law, so at least got a basis for argument.
Without a speed limit, 250 kmh also can be a road hog rite??!!? A Murcielago come at 300 kmh, see how u bloody give way to him at 250! hahahah....
Its an exaggerated example, but need to emphasize cuz some ppl just cant see the point.
just one thing, why cant the driver go and cut in to the left then overtake you if he driving so fast. its more the other driver irritating the law abiding person.Originally posted by houndy:I have to agree with you on this one.. our speed limit is 90KM.. yes.. but if someone comes behind you at 110KM.. you should give way and later go behind him/her if you wish to continue on the first lane... no point irritating yourself and the other driver and getting into an accident...