Road hoggers vs tailgaters
-
i see nothing wrong with road hogging, it's just inconsiderate driving, but it's not hazardous driving, the traffic police should not make road hogging an offence, unless they cause obstruction to police car or ambulances
i enjoy road hogging, road hogging is fun, i enjoy seeing desperate losers drivers tailgating me and trying desperately to beg a way past me, if they ever dare to bang me from behind, i will come out of my car and pull off their dicks, i love road hogging, road hogging is fun, tailgating is dangerous, road hogging is not dangerous. Road hoggers vs tail gaters, tailgaters vs road hoggers, when a collision happens between a road hogger and a tailgater, the tailgater is at fault, cos he bangs the road hogger from behind
tailgating is dangerous, i hate tailgaters, tailgaters are vulnerable to traffic collisons
on escalators in MRT stations, there is nothing wrong standing on the right of the escalator and blocking people in a rush, i love doing that
in a crowded place, you are in a rush but there are many people blocking your way, you cannot blame them, but blame your bloody luck, there is nothing you can do, but to resign to your fate
likewise in a congested highway, you are in a rush, but u cannot blame the front vehicle from being slow and refusing to give way to you, there is also nothing you can do, but resign to your fate, road hogging is inevitable, if you are in a rush and you tailgate the front vehicle, god bless you, you bang into him, you are at fault, not the road-hogger, god bless you, wake up your idea, don't tailgate
road hogging is inconsiderate, but it's harmless. Impatient driving is dangerous, if you plan your route and give enough time allowance, you will not be in a rush
If you are in a rush, that's your own problem, not the road-hogger's fault. Road hogging is ok. Road hogging is safe driving. As long as we are driving within the speed limit, even on right lane, it's considered safe driving
Road hogging is safe drivng. If driving too slow and blocking people is considered road hogging, then roadworks and road repair by LTA on the right lane is also considered road hogging, the government is road-hogging and should be punished. -
Have you ever realised... what if the driver in the car behind you is rushing his grandfather, who just had a heart attack, to the hospital, and your inconsiderate behavior, not based on ignorance but sheer sadisticity, results in a life lost. Can you live with that?
-
fella doesn't even have a brain. u think it matters if he had a heart?
wrong is wrong, rite is rite. making one wrong sound more rite than the other wrong doesn't make it a rite altogether. someone muz have messed with his ability to think logically.
-
hmm...u just kanna summon for road hogging izzit?
-
i have been road hogging for 11 years,Originally posted by so_nice:hmm...u just kanna summon for road hogging izzit?
haven't got involved in any traffic collisions, never kenna demerit points or traffic fines before -
Try me lah. I'll overtake you on the second lane and I'll abruptly cut into your lane (1st lane) and then I'll jam my brakes to purposely let you bang my behind and we'll see who more 'guai lan'...
-
I am willing to take you challenge, guai lan kia.
-
lol, we'll see if that really happens, but have u ever think, what will happen if i'm eventually able to brake safely to a halt in time and avoid banging into you, you are underestimating my reaction, anyway god bless you, the surveilance camera got your stunts, be prepared to answer that to the traffic policeOriginally posted by parryhotter:Try me lah. I'll overtake you on the second lane and I'll abruptly cut into your lane (1st lane) and then I'll jam my brakes to purposely let you bang my behind and we'll see who more 'guai lan'... -
Don't underestimate my ability to make you not stop in timeOriginally posted by Tomas_Rosicko:lol, we'll see if that really happens, but have u ever think, what will happen if i'm eventually able to brake safely to a halt in time and avoid banging into you, you are underestimating my reaction, anyway god bless you, the surveilance camera got your stunts, be prepared to answer that to the traffic police -
I'm just going by the repetitive nature of your writing here, but, uh, you wouldn't happen to be intellectually disabled, would you? It kinda sounds like, "My unca told me to stay here, and I'm gonna stay here, because my unca told me to stay here, so I must stay here", know what I mean?Originally posted by Tomas_Rosicko:i love road hogging, road hogging is fun, tailgating is dangerous, road hogging is not dangerous. Road hoggers vs tail gaters, tailgaters vs road hoggers, when a collision happens between a road hogger and a tailgater, the tailgater is at fault, cos he bangs the road hogger from behind
tailgating is dangerous, i hate tailgaters, tailgaters are vulnerable to traffic collisons -
selfish arsehole...
one day he will learn his lesson....
or u might as well put speed limiter in ur car la...limit to 90 kph....kaninah -
Hogging the extreme left lane is so fun meh? The trucks... btw, have speed limit of... 60kmh?Originally posted by Tomas_Rosicko:i have been road hogging for 11 years,
haven't got involved in any traffic collisions, never kenna demerit points or traffic fines before
Is there no end to the barrel of stupidity u drinks from?
Happy Hogging, who cares about u? -
I think this topic was started by a Juvenile Delinquent.
Don't bother responding, people. -
Although the front part of it sound a little trouble-making, but still I feel that there are some sense in what he write. I also believe that road hogging isn't dangerous, just inconsiderate. Read carefully and you would notice his issue is with those tailgaters, which everyone of us is not comfortable with.
What I want to emphasis is that tailgater to force road hogger off the lane is a much more inconsiderate and idoitic act than hogging itself. Other polite signals to overtake are more welcome, even to the thread starter, I guess. Like even when the escalater case, if you politely ask, the right guy will still inch a space for you to cross, if situation calls for it (catching train). -
usually and most of the time tailgating only happen at lane 1. reason is simple. asshole who road hog and think that travelling at e road limit is correct. agreed that overtaking them and slowing down suddenly is a good way to teach them a lesson since TP dont realli bother abt selffish road hogger.
and comment from parryhotter "Try me lah. I'll overtake you on the second lane and I'll abruptly cut into your lane (1st lane) and then I'll jam my brakes to purposely let you bang my behind and we'll see who more 'guai lan'..."
bro dont jam brake and let other driver haf a chance to witness.. tryy using ur handbrake the asshole wont haf a chance to react and by e time he do so its too late. and dont bother with that asshole who say he love to road hog. he is jus so dumb and stupid. every netizen that read his post will only laugh their ass off.. so do i.. i believe u too.. and he will also crap abt the sky camera.. haha.. this kind of ppl like to think of many useless postings to counter ppl that dislike him but all his method are as useless as the author himself.. wat a pity.. i believe all road hogger will meet ur nemises one day. go on and carry on to road hog. -
childish thinking....selfish thinking too...the rule is simple..if ure travelling fucking slow, go to the last lane n join the trucks!! fancy driving a car n travel slower than a truck or bus, i think u change to a bicycle would be better..do u know u we have to pay extra erp now when going out of town? becoz of fucking road hoggers that travel so slow and jamming the whole fucking area.
Anyway i juz hope that one day,when u need to rush to the hospital to have your last moment wif ur any of ur family member, and u encounter pple that road hog ur way. maybe from there, u would know the feeling..... -
You know, I don't think any of us should bother replying to posts like these. Dicks like him are just out to post something stupid to rile us all up just for the fun of it. I would love to see him get stuck in a traffic jam during an emergency.
Instead of adding credibility and recognition to his topic by replying, I think it'll be much better if we'd just ignore all these stupid posts by ostentatiously stupid people.
TR: Keep the genes to yourself, thank you. Don't spread them at all.
-
I seen a motorcyclist riding at 100km/h on 1st lane. That is not considered hogging. A merc was right behind him, tailgating him. The motorcyclist sensed it and went faster, only to have that bloody merc also gone faster, STILL tailgating him. Hope you are aware that if he was to ride at 100km/h on 2nd lane, he would be blocked by many "hoggers". But riding on 1st lane at 100km/h, I wouldn't consider he was hogging. But he got tailgated so dangerously by that merc. Can you see it???
There is no need to tailgate. If you want, ovetake! Why tailgate? The threadstarter may be inconsiderate, but he pointed out rightly the FACT that tailgating is more dangerouls than hogging. As for ppl who says cut infront and jam brake, why do that? Someone who is inconsiderate doesn't warrant such treatment. If you dun like him, overtake him!!
If someone is is a hurry, like sending ppl to hospital, you can always overtake roadhoggers. There are plenty of considerate drivers around the road. There is NEVER a need to tailgate or hate roadhoggers. -
Agreed.Originally posted by alberteinstein:I seen a motorcyclist riding at 100km/h on 1st lane. That is not considered hogging. A merc was right behind him, tailgating him. The motorcyclist sensed it and went faster, only to have that bloody merc also gone faster, STILL tailgating him. Hope you are aware that if he was to ride at 100km/h on 2nd lane, he would be blocked by many "hoggers". But riding on 1st lane at 100km/h, I wouldn't consider he was hogging. But he got tailgated so dangerously by that merc. Can you see it???
There is no need to tailgate. If you want, ovetake! Why tailgate? The threadstarter may be inconsiderate, but he pointed out rightly the FACT that tailgating is more dangerouls than hogging. As for ppl who says cut infront and jam brake, why do that? Someone who is inconsiderate doesn't warrant such treatment. If you dun like him, overtake him!!
If someone is is a hurry, like sending ppl to hospital, you can always overtake roadhoggers. There are plenty of considerate drivers around the road. There is NEVER a need to tailgate or hate roadhoggers. -
Many chain collisions arise because of tail-gating. A lot of these smart-alecs overestimate their reaction and eventually succumb to a collision because they are unable to brake in time to avoid hitting the front vehicle. Very lousy driving skills also.
Even if you are approaching a road-hogger, as a road user, you have the responsibility to maintain a safe following behind him such that when he jam-brake, you can avoid hitting him. You DON'T F U CKING TAILGATE him unless you are asking for trouble understand. When a collision occurs, it's you who is at fault for banging him from behind
i love road-hogging -
Sorry, Road hogging is not stupid. Clever people don't tailgate, cos they won't get anything out of itOriginally posted by Kr0n:You know, I don't think any of us should bother replying to posts like these. Dicks like him are just out to post something stupid to rile us all up just for the fun of it. I would love to see him get stuck in a traffic jam during an emergency.
Instead of adding credibility and recognition to his topic by replying, I think it'll be much better if we'd just ignore all these stupid posts by ostentatiously stupid people.
TR: Keep the genes to yourself, thank you. Don't spread them at all. -
the bike can juz give way and let the merc overtake...after the merc overtake he can go back to the 1st lane...thats the way...for pple with vehicle..the main purpose to own 1 is so that it can ferry u from point a to point b in a faster way...if u like travelling at 70 km/hr...then go lane 2...dun block pples way n time by travelling in lane 1....if ure on 90km/hr...u saw a fast car behind...give way lah...after it overtake,u can go back to ur lane mah...u nv know if its sending pple to the hospital or wat mah...Originally posted by alberteinstein:I seen a motorcyclist riding at 100km/h on 1st lane. That is not considered hogging. A merc was right behind him, tailgating him. The motorcyclist sensed it and went faster, only to have that bloody merc also gone faster, STILL tailgating him. Hope you are aware that if he was to ride at 100km/h on 2nd lane, he would be blocked by many "hoggers". But riding on 1st lane at 100km/h, I wouldn't consider he was hogging. But he got tailgated so dangerously by that merc. Can you see it???
There is no need to tailgate. If you want, ovetake! Why tailgate? The threadstarter may be inconsiderate, but he pointed out rightly the FACT that tailgating is more dangerouls than hogging. As for ppl who says cut infront and jam brake, why do that? Someone who is inconsiderate doesn't warrant such treatment. If you dun like him, overtake him!!
If someone is is a hurry, like sending ppl to hospital, you can always overtake roadhoggers. There are plenty of considerate drivers around the road. There is NEVER a need to tailgate or hate roadhoggers. -
As I posted in the other thread, wat constitutes Road Hogging??
If you travel 130 on rite lane, and a guy come 160 behind you, you are a hog rite?? U should give way to him rite?
But don't you find it incovenient, at tat speed, to move back to middle lane so that the irritating speedster (160 guy) can pass?
The 90kmh ppl feel exactly the same way. Except that they are observing the law, so at least got a basis for argument.
Without a speed limit, 250 kmh also can be a road hog rite??!!? A Murcielago come at 300 kmh, see how u bloody give way to him at 250! hahahah....
Its an exaggerated example, but need to emphasize cuz some ppl just cant see the point. -
I have to agree with you on this one.. our speed limit is 90KM.. yes.. but if someone comes behind you at 110KM.. you should give way and later go behind him/her if you wish to continue on the first lane... no point irritating yourself and the other driver and getting into an accident...Originally posted by guitarman1:As I posted in the other thread, wat constitutes Road Hogging??
If you travel 130 on rite lane, and a guy come 160 behind you, you are a hog rite?? U should give way to him rite?
But don't you find it incovenient, at tat speed, to move back to middle lane so that the irritating speedster (160 guy) can pass?
The 90kmh ppl feel exactly the same way. Except that they are observing the law, so at least got a basis for argument.
Without a speed limit, 250 kmh also can be a road hog rite??!!? A Murcielago come at 300 kmh, see how u bloody give way to him at 250! hahahah....
Its an exaggerated example, but need to emphasize cuz some ppl just cant see the point. -
just one thing, why cant the driver go and cut in to the left then overtake you if he driving so fast. its more the other driver irritating the law abiding person.Originally posted by houndy:I have to agree with you on this one.. our speed limit is 90KM.. yes.. but if someone comes behind you at 110KM.. you should give way and later go behind him/her if you wish to continue on the first lane... no point irritating yourself and the other driver and getting into an accident...
note that you would probably have to slow down to cut in and risk blind spot judgement error etc when you cut in to other lane, inaddition to annoying the car diagonally behind you if that guy has to slow down for you. not only that you cut in front of some one may cuase that guy to slow down, this can pile up and cause traffic congestion, in the end its the speeder's fualt and duty to find his own way to speed. thats if the other lane is occupied so that that guy cant just cut in there and overtake you otherwise its back to the first paragraph