do u like suv ???? wad is ya fav suv den ??
-
great choice.. tough looking luxury suvOriginally posted by KLZW:yes.. they're all considered suvs..
my fav is mercedes-benz G-wagen
-
i personally like the subaru forester turbo. hahaha probably because i own it, but none the less it performs well for its price.
-
yes i do like the SUV, because it gives u the "manly" and "rugged" feeling.
If money not an issue, i go for this in particular order of pricing
1.VW toureg
2.Lexus RX300
3.N.Murano
4.M.Airtrek Turbo
anyway the new lexus rx400 coming out. It's a hybrid car. Watch out here for more. I will post pic of the new green car.....
However, i jus bought the new evo ix. So no money buy SUV...
-
lamborghini suv
-
Why do people drive SUV when they rarely go mountain trekking or off roading ? Is it because they think driving a huge-ass car will inflate their manhood? Or is it because they are 4 feet high and need a platform to ride on in order to have a better view of the road ?
-
Think the main reason is space. If you have a big family, a SUV makes more sense actually. More so if you lead an active lifestyle which requires you to carry bulky sports equipment around. Haha of course some just attracted to the hiao factor.Originally posted by philia:Why do people drive SUV when they rarely go mountain trekking or off roading ? Is it because they think driving a huge-ass car will inflate their manhood? Or is it because they are 4 feet high and need a platform to ride on in order to have a better view of the road ?
Anyway if I have a choice, I will get
1. XC 90 (number 1 choice!!)
2. Merc M class
The rest out there either not practical, simply look awful or too gu niang. -
Ford Explorer
-
I hate SUVs because they waste fuel (to lug around their bigger frames and 4WD systems) and I'm a politically correct shitwit. And none of them are pretty either, the new M-Class is about the most acceptable.
-
mate, FYI, Enzos n Carrera GTs burn even more fuel to lug around nothing but some small bags and 2 people. If SUVs are politically incorrect, fast cars r worse.Originally posted by Kuali Baba:I hate SUVs because they waste fuel (to lug around their bigger frames and 4WD systems) and I'm a politically correct shitwit. And none of them are pretty either, the new M-Class is about the most acceptable.
anyways my favs are, in no particular order:
Airtrek Turbo R
Porsche Cayenne Turbo
Mercedes G55 AMG
Mercedes M55 AMG
VW Touareg
Land Rover LR3
Range Rover
Mitsubishi Pajero Evolution -
Rinspeed Chopster
http://www.germancarfans.com/photos.cfm/photoid/3050215.001/Porsche/1.html
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame.php?file=car.php&carnum=2307
M63 AMG -
What do you think of the new ML63 AMG instead of the older ML55 AMG?Originally posted by HENG@:mate, FYI, Enzos n Carrera GTs burn even more fuel to lug around nothing but some small bags and 2 people. If SUVs are politically incorrect, fast cars r worse.
anyways my favs are, in no particular order:
Airtrek Turbo R
Porsche Cayenne Turbo
Mercedes G55 AMG
Mercedes M55 AMG
VW Touareg
Land Rover LR3
Range Rover
Mitsubishi Pajero Evolution
-
as long as its a merc AMG, i like.Originally posted by philia:What do you think of the new ML63 AMG instead of the older ML55 AMG?
-
Wah.. All i wan kan boh..
Mi preference:
1.V. XC90
2.M.Airtrek Turbo
3.BMW, X5 -
For me Its Gotta be the G55 AMG if $$ is no objection....next then comes the Range Rover Sport and of course my good Ol' Nissan X-trail and BTW the Fortuner Sucks IMO....it does not share the same platform as the HIACE...it shares the same chassis as the toyota HILUX(maybe a good thing as the HLIUX is indestructible)which is y its so heavy...nevermind the weight but the engine is weaker than a 2.5L and DRUMS at the rear....
-
never seen that car...when did it debut??Originally posted by philia:What do you think of the new ML63 AMG instead of the older ML55 AMG? -
It debuted at the Frankfurt Motor Show... It's not really welcomed by the public due to the high crude prices and it's seen as a socially irresponsible car. haha but who cares..it looks good all the same.Originally posted by AE86tofu:never seen that car...when did it debut?? -
ice cream
-
haha screw that i down about 120L per week lol
-
murano n airtrek turbo.. both damn sleek n power.. prado is jus too huge even for ur average moses lim..
-
That's quite peanuts considering you are driving an uncle car.Originally posted by SEI:haha screw that i down about 120L per week lol -
wad u mean socially irresponsible???Originally posted by KangZ:It debuted at the Frankfurt Motor Show... It's not really welcomed by the public due to the high crude prices and it's seen as a socially irresponsible car. haha but who cares..it looks good all the same. -
I think he wanted to mean that the car is not environmentally friendly.Originally posted by AE86tofu:wad u mean socially irresponsible??? -
Who cares if its not environmental friendly.....Supercars Are meant to turn third world countries into arid deserts...Not make dasies grow from grounds after they drive pass....Originally posted by philia:I think he wanted to mean that the car is not environmentally friendly. -
machiam like Ferrari Enzos, SLRs, Carrera GTs n Murcielagos are environentally friendly lidatOriginally posted by philia:I think he wanted to mean that the car is not environmentally friendly.
sometimes this kind of thing hor, ppl say no brains one. see other say also follow n say. never think deeper. someone say SUV socially irresponsible, all say the same thing. But supercars leh? sports cars leh? worse wad, carry less and drink more. Kenna hit by Enzo, pedestrian cfm get sliced into 2. But I dun hear anyone making the same hoo ha about it leh? Its double standards if u like supercars, sportscars and yet speak out against the SUV for being 'socially irresponsible'. Double standards, or plain laziness to use your brain.