3. yes, any wider would be an invitation for someone to cut in.Originally posted by mancha:Why 3: At 70,80kmph leave only 1 car length space with car in front? Any wider would be an invitation for someone to cut in?
Why 4: Why signal in the midst of lane changing? Shouldn't it be (1) signal intention, (2) check for opportunity, (3) execute lane change.
haha.. it's a reality of life i guess.Originally posted by sinicker:3. yes, any wider would be an invitation for someone to cut in.
4. if signal early, the car on the right lane a distance behind you would speed up thus not allowing you to lane change.
Perhaps TP testers should go patrolling in unmarked cars and give these drivers a quick revision course with some demerit points thrown in.i think they wont bother... cause i believe they themselves are doing the same thing also...
Basically, there's a lack of culture here with people in Singapore. A non-existant degree of common Courtesy or Grace, even after so many donkey decades of Courtesy campagnes and what nought.Originally posted by mancha:Why 1: Sedan cars emerging from a side road, not giving way to vehicles on a major road, shoot out and then roll on neutral, instead of zooming out of the way?
Why 2: Drivers speeding at extremely high speed to overtake a car on the extreme left lane that is travelling at 60kmph, cut into the left then brake hard and turn into a sideroad/carpark? Why can't they follow for a while and then turn left gently?
Why 3: At 70,80kmph leave only 1 car length space with car in front? Any wider would be an invitation for someone to cut in?
Why 4: Why signal in the midst of lane changing? Shouldn't it be (1) signal intention, (2) check for opportunity, (3) execute lane change.
Perhaps TP testers should go patrolling in unmarked cars and give these drivers a quick revision course with some demerit points thrown in.