Top gear Evo vs lambo
-
This lambo sure got problem shaking the evo..haha
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdcI_dHXOz0&mode=related&search= -
tts rubbish la...and its SOOOO outdated....
u see if that evo can outrun the lambo rnd the nurburgring 
-
that evo is the FQ-400.. hardcore one.. got 400BHP..
-
i tink tat is the normal stock evo, if it was a 400hp evo, it shd be as fast or even faster than the lambo on the straights.
-
It was already mentioned in the vid that THAT Evo has 400 horsepower, thus known as the FQ-400.
It did bring out the big flaw of the Evo, its big turbo
It is fast no doubt, but no matter what, the lambo's 6.2 600bhp V12 just simply says its faster
-
Lol... such an old video... You should see the part after that... where the evo gets trounced by a 1.6l Fiat Stilo Estate... just cos its HUGE turbo lag... lol...
-
AHAHHAA
i wonder if that lambo still stand a chance if they brought in the only 800hp Norris tuned EVO 9 -
tuned evo? ok. time to fish out the tuned lambos. its only fair.Originally posted by olala:AHAHHAA
i wonder if that lambo still stand a chance if they brought in the only 800hp Norris tuned EVO 9 -
dam~Originally posted by HENG@:tuned evo? ok. time to fish out the tuned lambos. its only fair. 
-
Stock to Stock ... how can an evo ever outrun a lambo.
Even if change the turbo to the 1 big 1 small big big turbo and tune to 400.
At the most 0-100 km/h maybe on par... but once above 180km/h... I wonder how an evo can chase the monster bull.
According to survery:
Evo
0-100km/h: 5.2sec
0-200km/h: 12 secs
Lambo Murc
0-100km/h: 4.2sec
0-200km/h: 9.8sec
This is just an averegae survey on the fast timing it can get from 0-200km/h
At the 200km/h mark... most probably the evo is 1 lampost behind. lolz..
Just my 2 cents... -
Looks to me the Lambo driver was told to let Evo look good...
Doesn't make sense when the Lambo's ground clearance is so low and cannot handle corners. I see that the Evo's suspension is so spongy around corners.
It's marketing gimmick I feel.. -
Looks to me the Lambo driver was told to let Evo look good...
Doesn't make sense when the Lambo's ground clearance is so low and cannot handle corners. I see that the Evo's suspension is so spongy around corners.
It's marketing gimmick I feel.. -
the VFQ400's 0-100 time is 3.8 secs. AS TESTEDOriginally posted by drumstick:Stock to Stock ... how can an evo ever outrun a lambo.
Even if change the turbo to the 1 big 1 small big big turbo and tune to 400.
At the most 0-100 km/h maybe on par... but once above 180km/h... I wonder how an evo can chase the monster bull.
According to survery:
Evo
0-100km/h: 5.2sec
0-200km/h: 12 secs
Lambo Murc
0-100km/h: 4.2sec
0-200km/h: 9.8sec
This is just an averegae survey on the fast timing it can get from 0-200km/h
At the 200km/h mark... most probably the evo is 1 lampost behind. lolz..
Just my 2 cents... -
oh i have no doubt the evo in this case can keep up with the lambo. however, the spin was quite probably orchestrated.Originally posted by ShutterBug:Looks to me the Lambo driver was told to let Evo look good...
Doesn't make sense when the Lambo's ground clearance is so low and cannot handle corners. I see that the Evo's suspension is so spongy around corners.
It's marketing gimmick I feel..
as for how well a car can corner, it has more to do than ground clearance alone. -
Visibly, the Lambo has much broader wheelbase.Originally posted by HENG@:oh i have no doubt the evo in this case can keep up with the lambo. however, the spin was quite probably orchestrated.
as for how well a car can corner, it has more to do than ground clearance alone.
Wouldn't this count for superb cornering abilities?
Agreeably, the Evo is King on the road as is obvious on our roads today, but pitching it with a Lambo and saying it can even outshine a Lambo? I think it's marketing.
By the way, anyone know how is the consumption like on such an evil car, the Evo? -
if really a lambo was to lose out, they wud be better selling toy cars instead
-
the cornering does not solely base on the wheelbase only. The sheer weight of the Murcielago makes it difficult to turn round corners. Similarly take a bag that is empty and take a bag filled with stuffs and try to fling them around and change direction. You will see what i mean.
Btw I'm sure many of you watched the so gorgeous looking Gallardo convertible episode, Jeremy did mention that Lambo owners simply do not care how fast the lambo goes round corners but simply the sound and its looks. As a lambo fan i have to say i have that mindset
-
hmmm. i missed the gallardo convertible esposide. which week is that?Originally posted by storm_freaky13:the cornering does not solely base on the wheelbase only. The sheer weight of the Murcielago makes it difficult to turn round corners. Similarly take a bag that is empty and take a bag filled with stuffs and try to fling them around and change direction. You will see what i mean.
Btw I'm sure many of you watched the so gorgeous looking Gallardo convertible episode, Jeremy did mention that Lambo owners simply do not care how fast the lambo goes round corners but simply the sound and its looks. As a lambo fan i have to say i have that mindset -
imagine hw much work and effort u have 2 go thru just 2 put 800BHP into a 4 banger and i can gurantee u it wun be reliable and undrivable for everyday use...u're talking abt the whole package when u say which car is better u noob....Originally posted by olala:AHAHHAA
i wonder if that lambo still stand a chance if they brought in the only 800hp Norris tuned EVO 9 and i can tell u that car is...RUBBISH.... a mclaren F1 LM is MUCH more economical than the FQ400 already and that is in race spec... 
-
it does 3.6MPG....and the mclaren F1 GTR does 6MPG and its WAY faster....Originally posted by ShutterBug:Visibly, the Lambo has much broader wheelbase.
Wouldn't this count for superb cornering abilities?
Agreeably, the Evo is King on the road as is obvious on our roads today, but pitching it with a Lambo and saying it can even outshine a Lambo? I think it's marketing.
By the way, anyone know how is the consumption like on such an evil car, the Evo? -
noob?Originally posted by AE86tofu:imagine hw much work and effort u have 2 go thru just 2 put 800BHP into a 4 banger and i can gurantee u it wun be reliable and undrivable for everyday use...u're talking abt the whole package when u say which car is better u noob.... and i can tell u that car is...RUBBISH.... a mclaren F1 LM is MUCH more economical than the FQ400 already and that is in race spec...
i wuld b surprise that a person wuld use a 800hp machine for road use
a 800hp norris evo is use for track
looks who talking -
at 200km/hr,i doubt 2.2 secs is not juz 1 lampost...Originally posted by drumstick:Stock to Stock ... how can an evo ever outrun a lambo.
Even if change the turbo to the 1 big 1 small big big turbo and tune to 400.
At the most 0-100 km/h maybe on par... but once above 180km/h... I wonder how an evo can chase the monster bull.
According to survery:
Evo
0-100km/h: 5.2sec
0-200km/h: 12 secs
Lambo Murc
0-100km/h: 4.2sec
0-200km/h: 9.8sec
This is just an averegae survey on the fast timing it can get from 0-200km/h
At the 200km/h mark... most probably the evo is 1 lampost behind. lolz..
Just my 2 cents... -
go ahead and try 2 use tt 800BHP car in a endurance race....Originally posted by olala:noob?
i wuld b surprise that a person wuld use a 800hp machine for road use
a 800hp norris evo is use for track
looks who talking even a 10+lap race tt car sure go kaput one...overheat like no ones business.... -
everycar will overheatOriginally posted by AE86tofu:go ahead and try 2 use tt 800BHP car in a endurance race.... even a 10+lap race tt car sure go kaput one...overheat like no ones business....
diferent car has the different pros and cons
juz like F1 cars are fast,they overheat easily -
do you even have the slightest clue about the meaning of "overheat"??Originally posted by olala:everycar will overheat
diferent car has the different pros and cons
juz like F1 cars are fast,they overheat easily