Let's compare car fuel consumption..
-
Hi,
With so many cars out there in the market, I was just wondering the actual petrol consumption for the various models. To start off, here's mine...
Car Model: Honda Jazz (Jul 2007)
FC: 16-17km/l (70% Expressway, 30% City)
Please continue sharing ur FC...
Cheers! -
Car Model: Toyota Corolla Altis 1.6 (Jul 2004)
FC: 15.8km/l (80% Expressway, 20% City) -
Car Model: Nissan Sunny FL Manual Drive(Oct 2003)
FC: 15+km/l (70% Expressway, 30% City)
Light modification of cold air intake. -
I think its more of how u drive than wad car u drive..
-
civic fd1a
8km/l to 12km/l (heavy foot to light foot)
40% highway 60% stuck in traffic light -
Galant 2.0 GDI (10.5 km/l - 11.5 km/l) drove for 4.5 yrs & just scrap.
Camry 2.0 (11 km/l - 12 km/l) just bought for 3 weeks.
Both car based on 30% urban driving & 70% expressway. -
With normal driving, it is 300+ per full tank and with fuel saving driving I get 500+ per full tank...
No matter what car you drive, you can have substantial savings if you practice fuel savings techniques. -
how to calculate the distance travelled per litre?
-
Go to the petrol station and reset the odometer to zero. Then pump to full tank.
After maybe using half a tank, go to the petrol station and pump to full. Record down the mileage shown in the odometer. Record down the amount of petrol pumped. Divide the mileage by the number of liters and you get km/liter.
Reset the odometer back to zero, pump to full, use about half and repeat this a few times and take the average. -
FD2A
11.3 - 12km/l
65% E'way 35% City -
My family's
Mitsubishi Grandis - 9-10km/l
Middle-Footed(averaged 4k rpm)
30% road - 70% highway -
Subaru Forester 2.5XT 9.6 - 10.3 km/l
Toyota Corolla Altis 1.6 E 14.8-15.2 km/l
Both are around 75% highway 25% city. -
my altis FC is damn bad, only plus minus 11
-
bravo turbo
9-10km/l (still running in)
ex ride - integra
10km/l -
is the bravo turbo worth it?Originally posted by alex2405:bravo turbo
9-10km/l (still running in)
ex ride - integra
10km/l
Ridiculous price of 100k for the turbo model.Myaswell get a wrx -
But different market ma..WRX is for ah bengs and Bravo Turbo more for cultured people..Originally posted by ceecookie:is the bravo turbo worth it?
Ridiculous price of 100k for the turbo model.Myaswell get a wrx
-
i know that.But if u want turbo then wrx more value for money.Originally posted by alleggerita:But different market ma..WRX is for ah bengs and Bravo Turbo more for cultured people..
And for 100k,i rather buy the Mazda CX-7...Turbocharged engine taken from 6 MPS -
Altis and Sunny >15km/l?
New Camry >11km/h?
That's very seng.
My family's 03 Camry 8-10km/l. Think cos my dad puts alot of barang barang in the boot.
I also do share fuel burden sometimes. -
it depends alot on the perspective on how you look at.wrx resale value will be alot lower if you look at the current market.where else for myself, i'm looking for a comfort and a slight moderate power.as i have been driving jap cars for the past years, a conti will be a good change.was also deciding between the 207 gti and golf gt but guess the interior of bravo attracted me.
-
me is mazda 3 june06.
can range anywhere from 9-12km/l.
expressway 60 - 40 city.
does bodykit/door visors affect FC? -
To me at least, I think VW Golf's interior is the best among conti hatchbacks..quality the best and ergonomics also very good..very user-friendly..Originally posted by alex2405:it depends alot on the perspective on how you look at.wrx resale value will be alot lower if you look at the current market.where else for myself, i'm looking for a comfort and a slight moderate power.as i have been driving jap cars for the past years, a conti will be a good change.was also deciding between the 207 gti and golf gt but guess the interior of bravo attracted me.