<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in 'backfire' | sgForums.com</title>
    <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2/topics/317304</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://www.sgforums.com/open_search.xml"/>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>backfire replied by AE86tofu @ Wed, 14 May 2008 21:04:59 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;not only cos of that...but also in naturally aspirated
engines...its due to the valve overlap...especially for those
running camshafts with long duration....meaning that the exhaust
valves take longer than usual to close to help with the
"scavenging" effect...but as its damn long some of the gases from
the intake stoke escapes out into the exhaust valves...and the
exhaust pipes and valves being very hot...ignite the air/fuel
mixture....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:04:59 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2:317304:8086603</guid>
      <author>AE86tofu</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2/topics/317304</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>backfire replied by zerocool85 @ Wed, 14 May 2008 19:14:03 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;thanks for the explanation!.. however.. it doesnt make sense to
me though.. if all the cylinders do not combust the fuel.. it can
mean that less power is being output?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i always had the impression that performance wants all the fuel
to be burnt for maximum power and also efficiency..&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:14:03 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2:317304:8086407</guid>
      <author>zerocool85</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2/topics/317304</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>backfire replied by tomsss @ Wed, 14 May 2008 17:40:17 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;... plus the catylic converter, if they didn't remove it.... and
they are really expensive to replace.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:40:17 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2:317304:8086219</guid>
      <author>tomsss</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2/topics/317304</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>backfire replied by n0x @ Wed, 14 May 2008 03:34:07 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;there are 2 reasons which i know of which cause backfire from
the exhaust...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) they install a kit at the exhaust there to make it
backfire... of cos its illegal in sg...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) the car's egine has anti-lag system or&amp;nbsp;in intial d
talk.. "the mis-firing system"&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;why does such a system exist?? bcos there is a need to counter
turbo lag in turbocharged engines...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;usually in a normal engine... the spark plug is tuned to
detonate the fuel air mixture at top dead end.. meaning when the
mixture is fully compressed... after which the exhaust is
expelled...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;however.&amp;nbsp; in an anti lag system.. the engine is tuned such
that the detonation of the spark plug in&amp;nbsp;one of the
cylinder&amp;nbsp;is delayed... so when the rest of the cylinders
detonate ... tt one particular cylinder did not.. and when the
exhaust is expelled in the other cylinders.. tt special cylinder is
expelling unburnt fuel air mixuter... and this is when the spark
plug detonate...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;so in other words... the combustion of the air fuel mixture
happens in the exhuast manifold... and this drives the
turbocharger.. and produce the back fire and the popping sound u
hear..much like someone firing an M16....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;of cos this means u have to change exhuast manifold and
turbocharger frequently bcos they are literally eaten up by the
flames.... 5000km if i am not wrong..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 03:34:07 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2:317304:8084732</guid>
      <author>n0x</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2/topics/317304</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>backfire replied by NoobBOY @ Tue, 13 May 2008 19:45:06 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There's many causes that cause the engine to backfire, all i can
remember now is left over unburnt fuel and wrong camshaft
timing&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:45:06 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2:317304:8083843</guid>
      <author>NoobBOY</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2/topics/317304</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>backfire replied by zerocool85 @ Mon, 12 May 2008 17:29:53 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;i read on the net about backfires..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;too lean fuel with too much air&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and too rich with too little air&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;is this the cause? and if it is claimed to be dangerous and
unhealthy for engines/exhaust to have backfires.. why do the so
called well-tuned-cars still have backfires? cars like ferrari that
is stock also have backfire..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;can anybody explain? to add on, i also know the difference
between afterfire and backfire..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;afterfire is just the continuous popping of exhaust sounds after
reving.. backfires will have flames coming out..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;asking this question because i saw a red f430 speeding in KG
JAVA tunnel earlier on with flames coming out of his exhaust
shifting up his gear and releasing throttle.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:29:53 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2:317304:8081046</guid>
      <author>zerocool85</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2/topics/317304</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
