<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in 'China No 1 in......!!!' | sgForums.com</title>
    <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2237/topics/314626</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://www.sgforums.com/open_search.xml"/>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>China No 1 in......!!! replied by Arapahoe @ Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:16:10 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;is also number 1 in copy and fake.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:16:10 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2237:314626:8018052</guid>
      <author>Arapahoe</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2237/topics/314626</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>China No 1 in......!!! replied by elindra @ Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:23:05 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Of course la somemore to cut cost a lot of companies there burn
coal as a source of energy coz it's cheaper&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:23:05 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2237:314626:8016555</guid>
      <author>elindra</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2237/topics/314626</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>China No 1 in......!!! replied by noahnoah @ Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:18:17 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LOS ANGELES (AFP) - - &lt;strong&gt;China has already surpassed the
United States as the world's largest carbon polluter, the authors
of a California study said Tuesday&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our best forecast has China's CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions
correctly surpassing the United States in 2006 rather than 2020 as
previously anticipated," said the study by researchers at the
University of California.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The report, written by economic professors Maximilian Aufhammer
of UC Berkeley and Richard Carson of UC San Diego, is to be
published next month in the Journal of Environmental Economics and
Management.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers compiled information about the use of fossil fuels
in various Chinese provinces and forecast an 11 percent annual
growth of carbon emissions from 2004 to 2010&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Previous estimates had set the growth rate at 2.5 to five
percent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The spike in air pollution by China has largely cancelled out
efforts by other countries' attempts to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol, the authors
said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers predicted that by 2010, "there will be an
increase of 600 million metric tons of carbon emissions in China
over the country's levels in 2000."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That growth would "dramatically overshadow the 116 million
metric tons of carbon emissions reductions pledged by all the
developed countries in the Kyoto Protocol," the report said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Put another way, the projected annual increase in China alone
over the next several years is greater than the current emissions
produced by either Great Britain or Germany.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The researchers studied pollution data from China's 30
provincial entities in order to obtain a more precise snapshot of
greenhouse gas emissions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Everybody had been treating China as single country, but each
of the country's provinces is larger than many European countries,
both in geographic size and population," said Carson.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"In addition, there is a wide range in economic development and
wealth from one province to the next, as well as major differences
in population growth, all of which has an effect on energy
consumption that cannot be easily addressed in models based upon
aggregate national data."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aufhammer said the results showed the "emissions growth rate is
surpassing our worst expectations, and that means the goal of
stabilizing atmospheric CO2 is going to be much, much harder to
achieve."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:18:17 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2237:314626:8016549</guid>
      <author>noahnoah</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2237/topics/314626</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
