<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in 'Ram question: It's Corsair performance better than Kingston?' | sgForums.com</title>
    <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2250/topics/317918</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://www.sgforums.com/open_search.xml"/>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Ram question: It's Corsair performance better than Kingston? replied by abao @ Tue, 20 May 2008 23:49:20 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Clock Latency matters more than brand.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 23:49:20 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2250:317918:8101353</guid>
      <author>abao</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2250/topics/317918</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ram question: It's Corsair performance better than Kingston? replied by SoulDivine @ Sun, 18 May 2008 23:51:06 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When it comes to RAM modules, brand does not matter other than
where/which distributor you have to look for when you need a
replacement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a RAM is suppose to run at 800Mhz, it doesent matter which
brand you are using as all will run at the speed specified, thus
same performance regardless of brand.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 23:51:06 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2250:317918:8096308</guid>
      <author>SoulDivine</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2250/topics/317918</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ram question: It's Corsair performance better than Kingston? replied by MyPillowTalks @ Sun, 18 May 2008 13:49:55 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;in my opinion, actually i don't think the brand matters, what
matters is the amount of memory, the front side bus speed, and the
lantency, for better performance, choose those KIT, both run @ same
speed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;im using Corsair XM2 800mhz dual channel 4gb KIT, and i think
that the performance is notbad already.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 13:49:55 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2250:317918:8094737</guid>
      <author>MyPillowTalks</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2250/topics/317918</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ram question: It's Corsair performance better than Kingston? replied by Animetshop @ Sun, 18 May 2008 12:19:17 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ram question: It's Corsair performance better than Kingston?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 12:19:17 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2250:317918:8094598</guid>
      <author>Animetshop</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2250/topics/317918</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
