<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in 'Chemistry- PH3' | sgForums.com</title>
    <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2297/topics/320041</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://www.sgforums.com/open_search.xml"/>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Chemistry- PH3 replied by UltimaOnline @ Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:17:05 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A student of mine came across something similar (and in fact
related, to this thread's discussion... you should be able to
figure out the connection, by the time you read the end of this
post), in her SAJC 2007 prelim paper practice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SAJC question&amp;nbsp;required that&amp;nbsp;the ('A'
level)&amp;nbsp;student be&amp;nbsp;aware of the fact that the bond
angle&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;H2S&amp;nbsp;is smaller than the bond angle in
H2O.&amp;nbsp;(Check for 'A'&amp;nbsp;level students :&amp;nbsp;Did you know
this?). Since it was a Paper 1 qn, it is uncertain if SAJC expected
their students to be able to explain why.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read the following url for the answer (several suggestions by
different people are made, you should be able to pick up the most
relevant and helpful one from the list... how about that? another
MCQ question for you right there!).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Why is the bond angle smaller in H2S compared to in H2O?"&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=
"http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/chem03/chem03447.htm" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/chem03/chem03447.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(When you're done with the above, ask yourself if you see the
link to the PH3 vs NH3 discussion... see the connection? Yes, the
helpful reply by Roberto Gregorius does add&amp;nbsp;on an important
point to my explanation (see previous post in this thread)&amp;nbsp;on
PH3, namely&amp;nbsp;the link between&amp;nbsp;atomic radii (or&amp;nbsp;number
of electron shells)&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;the *need* for differing extents
of hybridization.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:17:05 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2297:320041:8199208</guid>
      <author>UltimaOnline</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2297/topics/320041</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chemistry- PH3 replied by Darkness_hacker99 @ Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:42:43 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! =D&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:42:43 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2297:320041:8155233</guid>
      <author>Darkness_hacker99</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2297/topics/320041</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chemistry- PH3 replied by UltimaOnline @ Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:59:31 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, there is more to this matter, but here is a brief
summary.&amp;nbsp;If anyone has anything further to add, please do
so.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As the electron geometry is tetrahedral (the molecular geometry
is trigonal pyramidal), you might expect the P bonding orbitals to
be sp3 hybridized, in accordance to the bond angles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, note that&amp;nbsp;because of the following (from
Wikipedia)&amp;nbsp;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; PH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; is a trigonal pyramidal molecule
with C&lt;sub&gt;3v&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="/topic/molecular-symmetry" class=
"" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style=
"text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #003399;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;molecular
symmetry&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;. The&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=
"/topic/bond-length" class="" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style=
"text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #003399;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;length&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;of the P-H
bond 1.42&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="/topic/ngstr-m-3" class="" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #003399;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&#197;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;, the H-P-H&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;a href="/topic/molecular-geometry" class="" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #003399;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;bond angles&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;are
93.5&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href="/topic/degree" class="" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #003399;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&#176;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;. The&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;a href="/topic/dipole-moment-disambiguation-1" class="" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #003399;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;dipole moment&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;is
0.58 D, which increases with&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=
"/topic/substitution-chemistry" class="" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #003399;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;substitution&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;em&gt;of&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="/topic/methyl" class="" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #003399;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;methyl groups&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;in
the series: CH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;PH&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, 1.10 D;
(CH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;)&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;PH, 1.23 D;
(CH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;)&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;P, 1.19 D. In contrast, the dipole
moments of amines decrease with substitution, starting with&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;a href="/topic/ammonia" class="" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style=
"text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #003399;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;ammonia&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;, which has
a dipole moment of 1.47 D. The low dipole moment and almost
orthogonal bond angles lead to the conclusion that in
PH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; the P-H bonds are almost entirely p&#963;(P) &#8211; s&#963;(H) and
the lone pair contributes only a little to the&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=
"/topic/molecular-orbital" class="" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style=
"text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #003399;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;molecular
orbitals&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;. The high positive chemical
shift of the P atom in&lt;sup&gt;31&lt;/sup&gt;P NMR spectrum accords with the
conclusion that the lone pair electrons occupy the 3s orbital and
so are close to the P atom. This electronic structure leads to a
lack of&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="/topic/nucleophile" class="" rel=
"nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #003399;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;nucleophilicity&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;em&gt;and an inability to form&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="/topic/hydrogen-bond"
class="" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;span style=
"text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style=
"color: #003399;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;hydrogen bonds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;.
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(edited : For those who might be confused, I will&amp;nbsp;give a
simplified explanation&amp;nbsp;of the statement "the &lt;em&gt;almost
orthogonal bond angles lead to the conclusion that in
PH&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; the P-H bonds are almost entirely p&#963;(P) &#8211; s&#963;(H) and
the lone pair contributes only a little to the molecular
orbitals".&lt;/em&gt; Recall that p orbitals are px, py and pz, 90 deg
angles. Whilst sp3 hybridized orbitals have 109.5 deg angles. Since
in PH3 the angles are much closer to 90 deg than 109.5 deg, you
would expect the P-H bonds to be mainly sigma bonds from the
overlap of p electrons (from P) and s electrons (from H). Notice
then, that the s orbitals are largely not involved in bonding, ie.
the lone pair occupies the s orbital. Recall that the electrons in
the s orbital, on average, are closer (ie. spend more time nearer)
to the nucleus, compared to the electrons in the p orbitals. In
conclusion, the lone pair is close to the P nucleus, and hence P
has slightly increased electron density, which has an effect on
polarity of the molecule.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hence, due to the&amp;nbsp;particular nature of the PH3 molecular
orbitals and&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;trigonal pyramidal&amp;nbsp;molecular
geometry, specifically that the lone pair occupying the 3s orbital
and thus being relatively&amp;nbsp;closer to the P atom than the bond
pairs&amp;nbsp;between P and H, there is consequently a
slightly&amp;nbsp;greater electron density and a slightly
partial&amp;nbsp;negative charge&amp;nbsp;on the P atom (even as P and H
have the same electronegativity),&amp;nbsp;and hence&amp;nbsp;a slight
dipole moment, making PH3 a slightly polar molecule.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Therefore, you would expect the permanent dipole-dipole
interactions to be weak, unlike the stronger hydrogen bonding in
NH3. Induced dipole-dipole van der Waals interactions,&amp;nbsp;that
are present between all molecules (whether polar or non-polar),
would play a significant role in the intermolecular&amp;nbsp;attractive
forces for PH3.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If anyone has anything further to add, please&amp;nbsp;do
so.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:59:31 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2297:320041:8146844</guid>
      <author>UltimaOnline</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2297/topics/320041</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chemistry- PH3 replied by UltimaOnline @ Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:13:58 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ah yes, you're correct. P and H both have the same
electronegativity of 2.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hold a moment...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:13:58 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2297:320041:8146776</guid>
      <author>UltimaOnline</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2297/topics/320041</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chemistry- PH3 replied by Bigcable22 @ Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:57:31 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by UltimaOnline:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Like ammonia (N and P are both Grp V), phosphorus&amp;nbsp;hydride
or phosphane (IUPAC names) aka phosphine (common name)&amp;nbsp;has
VSEPER geometry of&amp;nbsp;trigonal pyramidal with 3 bond pairs and
one lone pair. Phosphorus is more electronegative than hydrogen.
Thus permanent dipole-dipole interactions exist between PH3
molecules.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Electronegativity increases from left to right, and bottom to
top, of the periodic table. Most electronegative element is
flourine, followed by oxygen, then third place is a draw between
nitrogen and chlorine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;erm no.. For PH3, the electronegativity difference is 0 between
P and H (2.1 for each)..&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:57:31 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2297:320041:8146618</guid>
      <author>Bigcable22</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2297/topics/320041</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chemistry- PH3 replied by UltimaOnline @ Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:15:38 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Like ammonia (N and P are both Grp V), phosphorus&amp;nbsp;hydride
or phosphane (IUPAC names) aka phosphine (common name)&amp;nbsp;has
VSEPER geometry of&amp;nbsp;trigonal pyramidal with 3 bond pairs and
one lone pair. Phosphorus is more electronegative than hydrogen.
Thus permanent dipole-dipole interactions exist between PH3
molecules.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Electronegativity increases from left to right, and bottom to
top, of the periodic table. Most electronegative element is
flourine, followed by oxygen, then third place is a draw between
nitrogen and chlorine.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:15:38 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2297:320041:8146289</guid>
      <author>UltimaOnline</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2297/topics/320041</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chemistry- PH3 replied by Bigcable22 @ Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:50:46 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How come PH3 molecules have permanent dipole dipole attraction
arh? Dont P and H have the same electronegativity?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:50:46 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2297:320041:8145291</guid>
      <author>Bigcable22</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2297/topics/320041</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
