<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in 'Premier players hit &#163;1bn jackpot - Europe left behind' | sgForums.com</title>
    <link>http://sgforums.com/forums/2497/topics/319071</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://sgforums.com/open_search.xml"/>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Premier players hit &#163;1bn jackpot - Europe left behind replied by purpledragon84 @ Sat, 31 May 2008 01:05:15 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by sand king:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LOL to the 3rd point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
poor wigan hahaha..&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 01:05:15 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">sgforums.com:2497:319071:8127276</guid>
      <author>purpledragon84</author>
      <link>http://sgforums.com/forums/2497/topics/319071</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Premier players hit &#163;1bn jackpot - Europe left behind replied by sand king @ Sat, 31 May 2008 00:53:45 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;LOL to the 3rd point.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:53:45 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">sgforums.com:2497:319071:8127255</guid>
      <author>sand king</author>
      <link>http://sgforums.com/forums/2497/topics/319071</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Premier players hit &#163;1bn jackpot - Europe left behind replied by zocoss @ Thu, 29 May 2008 22:42:03 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by SexyChin:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;that is the total wages spent. it could mean that arsenal spent
less wages for more players.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You mean pay lesser but have more players correct?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This being the case, why don't they just cut away the dead wood
and pay the bigger guys more so they won't run away? hmmm...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 22:42:03 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">sgforums.com:2497:319071:8124573</guid>
      <author>zocoss</author>
      <link>http://sgforums.com/forums/2497/topics/319071</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Premier players hit &#163;1bn jackpot - Europe left behind replied by SexyChin @ Thu, 29 May 2008 22:25:56 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;that is the total wages spent. it could mean that arsenal spent
less wages for more players.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 22:25:56 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">sgforums.com:2497:319071:8124495</guid>
      <author>SexyChin</author>
      <link>http://sgforums.com/forums/2497/topics/319071</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Premier players hit &#163;1bn jackpot - Europe left behind replied by zocoss @ Thu, 29 May 2008 22:19:37 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I thought Arsenal had a&amp;nbsp;strict salary structure so&amp;nbsp;how
come only about $2 million lesser than United?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 22:19:37 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">sgforums.com:2497:319071:8124464</guid>
      <author>zocoss</author>
      <link>http://sgforums.com/forums/2497/topics/319071</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Premier players hit &#163;1bn jackpot - Europe left behind replied by zocoss @ Thu, 29 May 2008 10:07:02 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Premier players hit &#163;1bn jackpot - Europe left behind by
huge hike&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=
"http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/05/28/article-1022593-0168FBDF00000578-627_468x415.jpg"
height="415" alt="" width="468" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Wages in the Barclays Premier League broke through the
&#163;1billion barrier last season as clubs continued to pass their
riches to the players in the quest for glory. Deloitte's Annual
Review of Football Finances, published today, confirms the Premier
League as the wealthiest in the world and projects it will become
even wealthier.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revenues generated by clubs during the 2006-07 season totalled
more than &#163;1.5bn, an increase of 11 per cent on the previous season
and a figure which dwarfs the four other big European leagues.
Germany and Spain were the closest with revenues of
&#163;900million.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deloitte expect the Premier League figure to exceed &#163;2bn a year
before the end of the decade because the cash bonanza from last
summer's new broadcasting deal has already started to flow in. With
runaway revenues come spiralling wages. The average pre-tax salary
for a Premier League footballer was &#163;1m ( &#163;19,000 per week) in 2006
- 7, compared with &#163;210,000 for a player in the Championship.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Premier League wages for players and staff were up 13 per cent
to &#163;949m and will have passed &#163;1bn last season when the TV money
started to appear in club accounts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chelsea reported the biggest wage increase in 2006-07, up &#163;19m
as they signed Andriy Shevchenko and Michael Ballack on deals worth
more than &#163;125,000 a week and rewarded established players with new
contracts after back-to- back Premier League titles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other major increases were recorded by West Ham (&#163;13m),
Portsmouth (&#163;12m) and Newcastle (&#163;10m) - three clubs trying to
bridge the yawning gap to the Big Four, who command extra revenues
from the Champions League.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pompey's wage bill jumped by 49 per cent, the biggest for a
non-promoted club since the arrival of Roman Abramovich at Chelsea
in 2003. The investment was rewarded with two of the best seasons
in the club's history, finishing ninth and eighth and winning the
FA Cup. The achievements of West Ham and Newcastle did not match
their investment. West Ham were almost relegated and Newcastle
struggled on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Transfer spending also soared. The record &#163;492m in 2006-07 was
smashed last season when &#163;600m was paid for players, most of it
going overseas. The vast wealth of England's top division means the
mid-table teams can compete financially with bigger sides in Europe
in terms of transfer fees and salaries, leaving players to choose
between the money and the medals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If money talks there will be no end to the surge of foreign
players unless FIFA president Sepp Blatter successfully imposes a
quota system for homegrown players.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the influx of foreign owners started in English football
there was a suspicion they would prioritise profits but Deloitte
suggest their motives mirror those of the traditional owners of
English clubs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Modern owners are still prepared to ignore normal business
practices and indulge their fans by spending to strengthen the
team, although West Ham are now belt-tightening after the excesses
of the brief Eggert Magnusson era. The Premier League's wages to-
turnover ratio is 63 per cent, a figure Deloitte say remains
'reasonably comfortable'.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dan Jones, of Deloitte's Sports Business Group, said: 'As in
prior decades, we are seeing clubs treated as "trophy assets",
except with clubs now owned by billionaires from a range of
nationalities rather than local businessmen.'&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:07:02 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">sgforums.com:2497:319071:8122867</guid>
      <author>zocoss</author>
      <link>http://sgforums.com/forums/2497/topics/319071</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
