<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in 'Fat or Slim' | sgForums.com</title>
    <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2535/topics/316788</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://www.sgforums.com/open_search.xml"/>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Fat or Slim replied by fifteen @ Sat, 10 May 2008 14:27:28 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by Deino:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;haha...sorry...i know...i was juz playin around...haha&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;=)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 14:27:28 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2535:316788:8075721</guid>
      <author>fifteen</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2535/topics/316788</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fat or Slim replied by Deino @ Sat, 10 May 2008 09:17:41 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;haha...sorry...i know...i was juz playin around...haha&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 09:17:41 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2535:316788:8075093</guid>
      <author>Deino</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2535/topics/316788</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fat or Slim replied by FrozernFire @ Fri, 09 May 2008 20:38:21 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;the psp slim can be said to be more fragile, notably lacking a
metal chassis holding the motherboard and other components together
present in the original psp, and a thinner shell&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:38:21 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2535:316788:8074059</guid>
      <author>FrozernFire</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2535/topics/316788</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fat or Slim replied by fifteen @ Fri, 09 May 2008 15:23:00 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ha ha, chill. Nobody critisise it. But there's not a proper name
to use yet? The threadstarter use the word "fat" lols.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, it does depends on personal preference. I never say that
the not so slim and light one not good=)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Peace=)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:23:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2535:316788:8073529</guid>
      <author>fifteen</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2535/topics/316788</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fat or Slim replied by Deino @ Fri, 09 May 2008 00:56:00 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;ARGHHH.....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why the hell must people call it fat?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;juz becoz the 2ndG psp is called slim&amp;amp;lite doesn't mean you
can call it psp fat.....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;since when did sony labelled it PSP FAT?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;then wot the 3rd gen psp is gonna be called wot? psp anorexic?
lol&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f$@k you......i'm sorry...i'm just being pissed off...pls mind
me....haha....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i prefer the PSP coz it feels more solid....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #3366ff;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mod's note: sorry but have to
edit the word. Chill.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:56:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2535:316788:8072187</guid>
      <author>Deino</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2535/topics/316788</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fat or Slim replied by fifteen @ Thu, 08 May 2008 22:29:19 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Depends on personal reference. I prefer the Slim because it's
might lighter and slimer.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:29:19 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2535:316788:8071801</guid>
      <author>fifteen</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2535/topics/316788</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fat or Slim replied by slapper @ Wed, 07 May 2008 20:53:54 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Curious to know what you guys think about the newer slim PSP, as
compared to the 1G fat one. Personally I own a fat PSP and tried my
hands on the slim one - arrive with&amp;nbsp;the conclusion that I
still very much prefer the fat version, simply because it feels
more solid and durable. The slim one on the other hand, is flimsy
and quite fragile, granted it is light-weight and comes with more
colors, that's prob the only good thing. Still, coming out with the
slim version is probably Sony's way of cost cutting :P&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure if you can still get fat ones in the market, I
doubt so. For those who owns the fat PSP, think twice before
throwing them into the junk yard!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:53:54 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2535:316788:8068948</guid>
      <author>slapper</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2535/topics/316788</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
