Sports Very Own <FlameBox>!!!
-
Originally posted by ghimpheng:o well my 1st time i wrote to "The New Paper" and won myself letter of the week and some prizes
i am not acting big ego or what just to prove that your statement is false
You know wad? Your letter is just stating the obvious fact - Injuries = Dropping of point and though fixtures. It makes me wonder why edwin chose your letter cos i think anyone would have and could have come up with similar theories.
Why didn't you include the off field news? Didn't you know that players are affected psychologically as well? Like Lamps and Terry refusal to sign a new contract, Mourinho cold war with Abramovic, Ronaldo links to Madrid, etc?
You see, there really isn't anything to boast about. I'm pretty sure most of us here would have and could have written a much better letter.
Cheers.
CK -
You must understand, a little thing to most of us seems like a BIG thing to him. It's like how he thinks he knows a lot when he knows peanuts..... in fact, less than peanuts.Originally posted by CKeer:
You know wad? Your letter is just stating the obvious fact - Injuries = Dropping of point and though fixtures. It makes me wonder why edwin chose your letter cos i think anyone would have and could have come up with similar theories.
Why didn't you include the off field news? Didn't you know that players are affected psychologically as well? Like Lamps and Terry refusal to sign a new contract, Mourinho cold war with Abramovic, Ronaldo links to Madrid, etc?
You see, there really isn't anything to boast about. I'm pretty sure most of us here would have and could have written a much better letter.
Cheers.
CK -
haha i seen others posting the same thing (similar idea) but noe exactly the same and did not win the prizeOriginally posted by CKeer:
You know wad? Your letter is just stating the obvious fact - Injuries = Dropping of point and though fixtures. It makes me wonder why edwin chose your letter cos i think anyone would have and could have come up with similar theories.
Why didn't you include the off field news? Didn't you know that players are affected psychologically as well? Like Lamps and Terry refusal to sign a new contract, Mourinho cold war with Abramovic, Ronaldo links to Madrid, etc?
You see, there really isn't anything to boast about. I'm pretty sure most of us here would have and could have written a much better letter.
Cheers.
CK
And The Question of that Week is (How can Man U slip up?)
they are not asking about chelsea
ha now you are doubting the postman choice and even sort of insult him -
Action Speak louder than wordsOriginally posted by SumOne:You must understand, a little thing to most of us seems like a BIG thing to him. It's like how he thinks he knows a lot when he knows peanuts..... in fact, less than peanuts. -
Originally posted by ghimpheng:Action Speak louder than words
yong ci bu dang -
Originally posted by ghimpheng:haha i seen others posting the same thing (similar idea) but noe(not) exactly the same and did not win the prize
And The Question of that Week is (How can Man U slip up?)
they are not asking about chelsea
ha now you are doubting the postman choice and even sort of insult him
Damn, you're so good at contradicting yourself. See why? (Read the underlined)
As regards to the question of the week, didn't i mention off field problems about Ronaldo's links to Real Madrid and Barcelona? Also, since you said that they are not asking about Chelsea, why did you include these 2 sentences?
"Chelsea have no major injuries with Terry back. Only Joe Coe is currently injuried.
Also, Chelsea's form has been good since Petr Cech's return. I reckon that Chelsea will continue to shine. "
Click here
Think again.
Cheers.
CK -
Similar Idea but they did not comment on both chelsea and Man utd as detailed as me or comment only on man utdOriginally posted by CKeer:
Damn, you're so good at contradicting yourself. See why? (Read the underlined)
As regards to the question of the week, didn't i mention off field problems about Ronaldo's links to Real Madrid and Barcelona? Also, since you said that they are not asking about Chelsea, why did you include these 2 sentences?
"Chelsea have no major injuries with Terry back. Only Joe Coe is currently injuried.
Also, Chelsea's form has been good since Petr Cech's return. I reckon that Chelsea will continue to shine. "
Click here
Think again.
Cheers.
CK
if you had not read the rest of the letters for that week topic please go read it up b4 commenting as if u read all of them which i think you did not even have the paper and did not bother to read the paper and blast me all the way
And yes Chelsea form has been awesome as they won all epl games since Jan 31 2007 Seven Consecutive Victories -
Originally posted by ghimpheng:Similar Idea but they did not comment on both chelsea and Man utd as detailed as me or comment only on man utd
if you had not read the rest of the letters for that week topic please go read it up b4 commenting as if u read all of them which i think you did not even have the paper and did not bother to read the paper and blast me all the way
And yes Chelsea form has been awesome as they won all epl games since Jan 31 2007 Seven Consecutive Victories
Please la, I think you should be the one reading my post. I blast you because I said that most of us here would have and could have written a much better letter. Seriously, had Zocoss, Someone or Stellazio wrote in as well, you letter would not be even appearing in the Paper at all.
p.s I think your letter is chosen because your letter is long and the others are relatively short. It's a joke.
Please re-read what i've posted earlier before you post this self-kick-in-the-butt reply.
United is also on the roll with 7 consecutive premiership victories since 31st Jan 2007.
Cheers.
CK -
Why are you guys going on about something that everyone will forget after awhile except for that one person itself. Not like getting a letter of the day makes you a soccer guru or something like that. We know what are his 'real views' on soccer.
If he were to include those 'real views' of his, I doubt he would still be getting his letter of the day. He probably knows that anyway hence leaving them out. But I might also be giving that person too much credit, for him to know what to leave out.
End of the day, he got a letter of the day. That was more than a week ago or something? Who really remembers? -
Speaking of TNP, now Tohari Paijan's column is always a good read. Ojective, most in depth, most precise match analysis. Letter of the days are sometimes fun to read, but I won't count on for real soccer info or analysis. Not saying all those who get letters of the day are idiots (maybe at least one of them is), but like I said, it's not a credential telling others to die die listen to you when it comes to soccer. Especially when one's soccer knowledge has been found to be wanting on so many occassions vs one single letter.
-
Originally posted by CKeer:
you are insulting the editor not me
Please la, I think you should be the one reading my post. I blast you because I said that [b]most of us here would have and could have written a much better letter. Seriously, had Zocoss, Someone or Stellazio wrote in as well, you letter would not be even appearing in the Paper at all.
p.s I think your letter is chosen because your letter is long and the others are relatively short. It's a joke.
Please re-read what i've posted earlier before you post this self-kick-in-the-butt reply.
United is also on the roll with 7 consecutive premiership victories since 31st Jan 2007.
Cheers.
CK[/b] -
Originally posted by ghimpheng:you are insulting the editor not me
The fact is, i'm not insulting anyone. I'm just pointing out that I'm puzzled by the way they select the letter of the week. Insulting? Any vulgarities or name-calling from me? This is at most, a criticism.
Choose your words wisely young man.
Cheers.
CK -
Ghim Pheng is confused, as always.Originally posted by CKeer:
The fact is, i'm not insulting anyone. I'm just pointing out that I'm puzzled by the way they select the letter of the week. Insulting? Any vulgarities or name-calling from me? This is at most, a criticism.
Choose your words wisely young man.
Cheers.
CK -
you only know the word confuse / confused or whatOriginally posted by SumOne:Ghim Pheng is confused, as always.
Mister so called "Netural" -
I do know other words, but that one word best describes you.Originally posted by ghimpheng:you only know the word confuse / confused or what
Mister so called "Netural" -
moderators, why is super*** allowed to post rubbish?
it is not 1st but umpteen times, can he be kicked or ban? -
This one must ask Jason liao.Originally posted by iceFatboy:moderators, why is super*** allowed to post rubbish?
it is not 1st but umpteen times, can he be kicked or ban? -
i dun understand wads the game of cricket and why is it so important for India/Blangadesh to be involved in it
