http://sgforums.com/forums/3/topics/316818 en-US 60 <p>haiz... see the way they play.. know liao... but what can chelsea do... complain to FA meh.. even complain i don't think got use... cos.. just look at FA for the case over tevez.. u know who they side liao...</p> Fri, 16 May 2008 15:56:58 +0800 sgforums.com:3:316818:8090872 youyayu http://sgforums.com/forums/3/topics/316818 <p>*yawns</p> Mon, 12 May 2008 23:52:25 +0800 sgforums.com:3:316818:8081931 gigabyte14 http://sgforums.com/forums/3/topics/316818 <p>WestHam is like a bitch who willingly let other 'Man' abuse them.&nbsp; Can't believe there's such a team in BPL.</p> <p>No wonder Jcole &amp; Lampard left that crap of a team!</p> Mon, 12 May 2008 11:55:22 +0800 sgforums.com:3:316818:8080378 divingutd http://sgforums.com/forums/3/topics/316818 <p><strong><span style="color: #993300;">Aiyah, why so surprising?<br /></span></strong></p> <p><strong><span style="color: #993300;">Everytime Man U wins, it is a team that rolled over and died or kelong.</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span style="color: #993300;">Like Man U vs Liverpool. People say Liverpool kelong to Man U.</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span style="color: #993300;">This time, ppl say Man U take BPL, Chelsea take CL.</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span style="color: #993300;">Man U actually can just pick any tom dick and harry to play for them and still win the BPL. No problem!</span></strong> <img src= "/images/emoticons/kde-3.5.8/KMess-Violet/arrogant.png" alt= "arrogant.png" /></p> Thu, 08 May 2008 00:06:51 +0800 sgforums.com:3:316818:8069601 palachan http://sgforums.com/forums/3/topics/316818 <p><strong>Curbs have had stated it as such in his comments on Thursday.</strong></p> <p><strong>When he uttered them, you should have realised that he gave his team approval to just appear and then disappear on the pitch.</strong></p> <p><strong>That's why Chelsea became so angry, it was a sheer lack of professionalism.</strong></p> <p><strong>Still............WH manager Curbs is a good pal of Fergie. And West Ham is in mid-table, and not facing relegation. They could afford a loss and shrug it off.</strong></p> Thu, 08 May 2008 00:01:57 +0800 sgforums.com:3:316818:8069588 divingutd http://sgforums.com/forums/3/topics/316818 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Would you still believe that West Ham has been professional and did bother to move their butts in an attempt to deny Man Utd?</p> <p>1-0, 2-0, 3-0, no real effort to track the runs of Man Utd players. 3-1, was an "lucky" goal from Ashton who had his back facing goal, and was trying to do something&nbsp;special than getting&nbsp;back into the game.</p> <p>4-1, unbelievably easy for crarrick&nbsp;to control the ball, move it forward and&nbsp;pick his shot. Anyone surprised West Ham to continue their lacklusure performance after that? Mind you, they&nbsp;are&nbsp;playing with 1 extra man at 1-3!</p> <p>Wigan will do the same for Man Utd, it is the title to Old Trafford for sure. Unless, unless, Newcastle's Keegan decide to play with 11 strikers against Chelsea and end up losing 40-0. No other permutations&nbsp;that's for sure. (which he didn't.)</p> Wed, 07 May 2008 23:57:03 +0800 sgforums.com:3:316818:8069571 1greatguy http://sgforums.com/forums/3/topics/316818