which race got most muscular body
-
which race IN SINGAPORE got most muscular body (oni men u wan 2 incl. women, oso can)?
chinese? malays? indians? eurasians? maybe sikhs (not tamil indians, but sikh indians)? maybe foreigners? so called "ang mohs" (not fair to call european descent ppl ang moh lah, "red haired m0*key" is NOT respectful)?
europeans? americans? canadians? japanese? koreans? maybe foreign workers from thailand? china? india? bangladesh? philippines? indonesia?
your opinions which one issit?
i dun tink it's chinese for sure nor japanese nor koreans. i tink maybe europeans or sikhs? or maybe foreign construction workers because they work so hard physical labour? but dun get enuff food oso, cos dun have much money, they are used as cheap labourer oni. quite unfair actually.
sigh! -
huh?
u can simply get muscular body by working out
so u mean Europeans work out more than Asians? -
europeans. europeans have bigger a built than most asians.
-
know its clone liao
can smell the pungent coconut oil early in the morning
-
not totally true lah e.g. men have more muscular body than women oso other race may have more muscle than any one race. i wanna noe opinions oni. thxOriginally posted by laurence82:huh?
u can simply get muscular body by working out
so u mean Europeans work out more than Asians? -
u sure? sikhs oso quite stronng? i tink some malay guys oso quite buff? indian (non sikhs) oso not bad sometimes. chinese oso not bad.Originally posted by Saint Valentine:europeans. europeans have bigger a built than most asians.
see i just curious 2 noe which race got more muscular bodied ppl? -
plz learn 2 tok wif sum respect. dun throw unnecessary accusations. why u wanna laff @ coconut oil users. u got no respect for ur own oso issit?Originally posted by laurence82:know its clone liao
can smell the pungent coconut oil early in the morning -
whats wrong with coconut oil?Originally posted by protonhybrid:plz learn 2 tok wif sum respect. dun throw unnecessary accusations. why u wanna laff @ coconut oil users. u got no respect for ur own oso issit?
if u say that saying coconut oil is accusation, then people call me banana the whole day, i should be in hospital having seizure now -
mai dee siao lah.Originally posted by laurence82:whats wrong with coconut oil?
if u say that saying coconut oil is accusation, then people call me banana the whole day, i should be in hospital having seizure now -
grukhras..
dun know how to spell it -
anyone can get muscular if they just work out right, but Caucasians naturally have a more built body..
-
-
Japanese
-
i think the trolls..
humans can be the yardstick here...
the elves seem kinda effie since Legolas..
the hobbits got their name dragged through the mud by Frodo the Fag
dwarves are muscular, but they're kinda small...
but check out the orcs and the trolls... they're born bloodthirsty maniacs ready for war...
and also here, the trolls keep getting whacked, and banned, they keep coming back.. there must be a lot of muscles in there..
so, i vote the TROLLS -
I was thinking ogres.. or centaurs minus their hoven feet.. What say you?
-
With proper diet,enough sleep and serious training.Everybody can be muscular.
Of course genetics play a part.But ultimately it's all about hardwork.Nobody is born muscular.
-
u sure? u oso say genetics play a part then how?Originally posted by Burgerking:With proper diet,enough sleep and serious training.Everybody can be muscular.
Of course genetics play a part.But ultimately it's all about hardwork.Nobody is born muscular. -
how to see if got genetics?Originally posted by protonhybrid:u sure? u oso say genetics play a part then how? -
race? shud be all races... their legs also super fit
-
ppl say im quite muscular even tho i dont go to the gymOriginally posted by Burgerking:With proper diet,enough sleep and serious training.Everybody can be muscular.
Of course genetics play a part.But ultimately it's all about hardwork.Nobody is born muscular. -
-
some ppl are born with lower metabolism rate than others, some easier to gain muscle than others...etc. everyone is differentOriginally posted by protonhybrid:u sure? u oso say genetics play a part then how?
my friend who lift for less than a year already bigger than some ppl who lift for god-knows-how-long.
Genetics is kinda like talent. Lance armstrong's V2Omax thingy is at 80+, a normal less gifted person max is around 40. And if they train VERY hard, their max will not go beyond 60. Whereas even if Armstrong juz slack everyday his max will NOT go below 60
U gt watch football mahz? Know Maradona? Yes, we know he is gifted and he works very hard. But there are others who work harder than him but nowhere near as good as he is... -
An American academic, who teaches at the Warwick University in the United Kingdom, has described J R R Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings trilogy as an 'epic rooted in racism'.
Dr Stephen Shapiro, an expert in cultural studies, race and slavery, said the author used his novels to present bigotry through a fantasy world.
Following the release in UK of the film The Two Towers, the second in the series, Dr Shapiro told rediff.com that the books represent anxieties about immigration in mid-1950s Britain.
He said: "Put simply, Tolkien's good guys are white and the bad guys are black, slant-eyed, unattractive, inarticulate and a psychologically undeveloped horde."
In the trilogy, a small group, the fellowship, is pitted against a foreign horde and this reflects long-standing Anglo-European anxieties about being overwhelmed by non-Europeans, he said.
This is consistent with Tolkien's Nordicist convictions. He thinks the Northern races had a culture and it was carried in the blood, Dr Shapiro said.
While Tolkien describes the Hobbits and Elves as amazingly white, ethnically pure clans, their antagonists, the Orcs, are a motley dark-skinned mass, akin to tribal Africans or aborigines. The recent films amplify a 'fear of a black planet' and exaggerate this difference by insisting on stark white-black colour codes, Dr Shapiro said.
He added: "Tolkien wrote The Lord of the Rings because he wanted to recreate a mythology for the English, which had been destroyed by foreign invasion. He felt the Normans had destroyed organic English culture. There is the notion that foreigners destroy culture and there was also a fantasy that there was a solid homogeneous English culture there to begin with, which was not the case because there were Celts and Vikings and a host of other groups.
"We have a pure village ideal, which is being threatened by new technologies and groups coming in. I think the film has picked up on this by colour coding the characters in very stark ways.
"For instance, the fellowship is portrayed as uber-Aryan, very white and there is the notion that they are a vanishing group under the advent of the other, evil ethnic groups.
"The Orcs are a black mass that doesn't speak the languages and are desecrating the cathedrals.
"For today's film fans, this older racial anxiety fuses with a current fear and hatred of Islam that supports a crusading war in the Middle East. The mass appeal of The Lord of the Rings, and the recent movies may well rest on racist codes."
Dr Shapiro said that the trilogy, which began in the 1930s and published in the 1950s, was written at the onset of de-colonisation, when the first immigrants from the Caribbean and Indian subcontinent came to Britain. The Midlands, Tolkien's model for the Shire, was becoming a multicultural region.
A spokesman for Harper Collins, publisher of the trilogy, accused Dr Shapiro of mixing up his dates: "The copyright for The Fellowship of the Ring, the first in the series, was 1954. Tolkien would have finished writing the book quite a bit before the mid-50s and certainly the idea would have come a number of years before, given the sheer size of the book. So I think the timing is out.
"A number of academics have commented on Tolkien's work and this is the first time anybody has ever seen these issues in it. Of course, if you look hard enough at many great epics, you can extrapolate what you like, particularly if you have academic kudos behind you.
"A number of people have said that they think The Lord of the Rings could be an allegory for the Second World War, or indeed the first, as Tolkien fought in it, but it was never a view that he agreed with. His great abiding passion and interest came from the Icelandic sagas and mythology, and this was his version of one of those sagas." -
africans who come here?
-
i think all constuction workers veri fit...