Heaven does not exist - Andrew PK Yap
-
No problem, you win!!!!Originally posted by eagle:Try as you may to continue debunking me
We will leave for the forum to judge.
EAGLE FTW!!!!!
-
Why don't you start a topic next call
None of us ever exists - Andrew PK Yap
-
YES! 100th POST....
Mr....
Eat your heart out -
LOL... You celebrated your 100th post with a fireworksOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:YES! 100th POST....
Mr....
Eat your heart out -
It is a private joke between
and me... -
Lame and useless thread...
-
morbid4ever FTW!Originally posted by morbid4ever:Lame and useless thread... -
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:morbid4ever FTW!
I thought he was deep. Seems like he's nothing -
Gensis FTW!Originally posted by Gensis:
I thought he was deep. Seems like he's nothing -
But he's not stupid, a nut case maybe, but not stupid.Originally posted by Gensis:
I thought he was deep. Seems like he's nothing -
mancha FTW!!!Originally posted by mancha:But he's not stupid, a nut case maybe, but not stupid. -
He's not stupid. He's just lacking in logic. Seriously lacking.Originally posted by mancha:But he's not stupid, a nut case maybe, but not stupid. -
for someone who does not know that he has committed the logical fallacy of "ed hominem" ......Originally posted by Gensis:He's not stupid. He's just lacking in logic. Seriously lacking.
Gensis FTW!!!
with fireworks...
-
enlightened people would get on with their lives i would think
-
That is actually another logical fallacy the "omniscient fallacy" but since you are so polite, no fireworks for you...Originally posted by Eric Cartman:enlightened people would get on with their lives i would think -
Funny that you should talk about logic..
And wow you actually replied to everyone's posts are you trying to increase your post count? -
ulquiorra87 FTW!!!Originally posted by ulquiorra87:Funny that you should talk about logic..
And wow you actually replied to everyone's posts are you trying to increase your post count? sorry, got carried away...
Since I started the thread... it is only the polite thing to do... if I can... -
enlightenment has no logic
-
I see that you do not understand what a fallacy is. He's giving an opinion and you call it a fallacy. Let me brief you on what a fallacy is then.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:That is actually another logical fallacy the "omniscient fallacy" but since you are so polite, no fireworks for you...
A fallacy comes from an argument. An argument would consist of at least a premise and a conclusion. A fallacy is thus an error in the reasoning of the argument. This is different from a factual error, which is simply being wrong in facts. There are two different types of fallacies, deductive and inductive. An opinion is thus definitely not a fallacy.
The problem with you is that although your very first post consists of a good fallacy, your following posts do not. What you thought were fallacies are not fallacies. Conclusions from fallacies stems from the premises, which are usually factually correct. It's the error in reasoning in the conclusion that makes the fallacy. The example you have listed gives no conclusion. You have merely listed two premises, and you were unable to answer me what were your premises and conclusions, showing your total ignorance in this area while trying to argue and acting as if you know what a fallacy is.
These show one thing. You falter in the area of logic and reasoning. -
enlightenment my friend, is beyond the peak of logic... you climb to the summit of logic and you can climb no higher... you can only be enlightened...Originally posted by Eric Cartman:enlightenment has no logic
Where did you learn your nonsense about enlightened people and enlightenment? -
*sigh* you are hopeless, I do not know if I want to teach you.... anyway I GTG....Originally posted by eagle:I see that you do not understand what a fallacy is. He's giving an opinion and you call it a fallacy. Let me brief you on what a fallacy is then.
A fallacy comes from an argument. An argument would consist of at least a premise and a conclusion. A fallacy is thus an error in the reasoning of the argument. This is different from a factual error, which is simply being wrong in facts. There are two different types of fallacies, deductive and inductive. An opinion is thus definitely not a fallacy.
The problem with you is that although your very first post consists of a good fallacy, your following posts do not. What you thought were fallacies are not fallacies. Conclusions from fallacies stems from the premises, which are usually factually correct. It's the error in reasoning in the conclusion that makes the fallacy. The example you have listed gives no conclusion. You have merely listed two premises, and you were unable to answer me what were your premises and conclusions, showing your total ignorance in this area while trying to argue and acting as if you know what a fallacy is.
These show one thing. You falter in the area of logic and reasoning. -
ya ya... You were never fit enough to hold on to your logic and reasoning, simply because you do not have enough depth.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:*sigh* you are hopeless, I do not know if I want to teach you.... anyway I GTG.... -
OK eagle FTW!!!Originally posted by eagle:ya ya... You were never fit enough to hold on to your logic and reasoning, simply because you do not have enough depth.
really GTG... see ya! -
beyond peak of logic = no more logicOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:enlightenment my friend, is beyond the peak of logic... you climb to the summit of logic and you can climb no higher... you can only be enlightened...
Where did you learn your nonsense about enlightened people and enlightenment? -
Sorry that I was just bored... with no one else to chat with at that unearthly hour. Haha...
It was nice talking to you (ya, I know, mostly rubbish from my side). I respect you on how you see any winning and losing as a small matter. This is something that I need to learn; my desire to win is sometimes too strong. Just wondering if you do use MSN. I would like to add you. =D