
True, but it's difficult to say. Because he was standing infront of the test model, furthermore, to fully test the product, we don't have the spare resources. Because the product, VDR-MC5, requires a Handycam, regardless of DVtape, HDD, or DVD-R/+-RW and a 12cm blank DVD of any format. What's the worst part, it requires time. We have plenty of customers, especially that it's on a weekend and Christmas being just around the corner, we don't have the manpower to handle such things which requires such an extensive amount of time.Originally posted by unclepoh:Azurewind.....
yes i knw that uncle is wrong also to be in such an impolite manners. coz mayb he has that mindset " i can pay , customer is always right ... etc " Yes he did lost his cool barking around as u described........
ok i see this in another viewpoint....its miscommunication.
that uncle he wans to test the product but in according to u, product must be bought first, then allowed to be tested and exchanged if there is anything wrong with the product. But the uncle dun wan to buy first but insist on testing it first. . . . . maybe this is where the problem lies.
Maybe the uncle just want to try out the functions of the item, to have a feel of the item, take a closer look, or mayb plug in to see.......ok to some pple, this is called "testing". that is to test the item.
So he may say " can i test the item ? if not how i knw whether it suits me ? "
so actually he is not supposed to test before buying.
The keypoint here is wrong usage of word...or maybe presented himself wrongly....he should say " do u have a sample for me to try out ?" maybe that will be easier to understand by sales/promoters.....
no offence intended. just my personal views. pardon me for my lousy eng.
Because the customer is not obliged to buy. The same right appeal to us, and it will apply to us, you ask, we're not obliged to answer or give in to your demands. The world isn't fair. It's because you don't work for food or money, that you remain in the same standard as you are currently and will remain the stagnant until you die. Then you come up with your crappy philosophy that the tertiary sector is unfair. I'm pretty sure that if people can actually realize that Bush is dumb, I think they have the intellectual intelligence to realize that the tertiary sector is unfair. If it was unfair in the first place.Originally posted by beggarchief:DONT LISTEN TO OTHER PEOPLE. LISTEN TO BEGGAR, SURE NO WRONG ONE.
BEGGAR HAMMER PEOPLE IN YPAP NOBODY DARE FIGHT BACK. Y? BECAUSE BEGGAR IS CORRECT.
BEGGAR HAMMER PEOPLE HERE IN THIS FORUM AND YET THEY REBUTTED. Y? BECAUSE THEY DONT UNDERSTAND SIMPLE CONCEPT, SIMPLE LOGIC.
BELIEVE BEGGAR. WHATEVER BEGGAR SAY IS CORRECT, 100% CORRECT. IF NOT CORRECT, YOU CAN HAMMER MY DOG.
LET BEGGAR REITERATE ONE MORE TIME:
THE PRACTISE OF "PAY THEN TEST" IS AN UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICE AND SHOULD BE ABOLISHED,
TO PROTECT CONSUMERS' RIGHTS AND INTERESTS, AND FOR A FAIRER TRADE PRACTISE. IT SHOULD BE "TEST THEN PAY".
.........................................................
PLS DONATE GENEROUSLY TO BEGGARCHIEF'S AUTHORISED BEGGARS. ALL AUTHORISED BEGGARS WEAR A BEGGAR'S TAG WITH LIC NO.
Originally posted by cyrusv2:he might have ulterior motives.....like making claims to his companies or something..... dont be so hot-blooded my young one
Awww... you going?Originally posted by beggarchief:HI AZUREWIND,
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR RESPONSE.
ACTUALLY, BEGGAR DONT THINK LIKE POSTING ANYMORE, BUT BEGGAR THINKS YOUR POST DESERVES A REPLY FROM BEGGAR.
REALLY SORRY, BEGGAR CAN ONLY UNDERSTAND PART OF IT. THE REST TOO DEEP FOR BEGGAR TO COMPREHEN.
IN SPORE OR RATHER THIS WORLD, THERE ARE MANY UNFAIR TRADE PRACTISES.
THESE UNFAIR PRACTISES ARE NOT ILLEGAL. DEALS, CONTRACTS ETC ARE BETWEEN 2 CONTRACTING PARTIES, NO MATTER HOW UNFAIR, ONCE AGREED UPON, IT BECOMES BINDING.
THIS WORLD, INCLUDING SINGAPORE IS ABOUT BIG FISH EAT SMALL FISH.
BIG BUSINESSES DICTATE THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND THE HELPLESS CONSUMERS JUST ACCEPT IT QUIETLY.
C.A.S.E OR THE GOVT IS NOT GOING TO MEDDLE WITH COMMERCIAL AFFAIRS, ALTHOUGH C.A.S.E HAD MANAGED TO BEG THE GOVT AND NOW HAVE SOME TEETH TO BITE.
THERE ARE STILL ALOT FOR C.A.S.E TO DO TO INCLUDE MORE UNFAIR PRACTISES BY UNSCRUPULOUS BUSINESSES TO COME UNDER THE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTISES ACT.
THE PRACTICE OF "PAY THEN TEST" IS AN EXAMPLE OF UNFAIR TRADE PRACTISES.
WHAT BEGGAR IS TRYING TO DO HERE IS TO HIGHLIGHT THAT IT IS NOT FAIR AND NEED TO CHANGE.
CONSUMERS WHO DONT KNOW THEIR RIGHTS OR NOT FIGHTING FOR THEIR RIGHTS SUFFER.
IT IS UP TO INDIVIDUAL CONSUMER TO DECIDE WHETHER THEY WANT TO FIGHT FOR THEIR RIGHTS.
ABOVE ARE ABOUT THE TOPIC OF THIS THREAD.
NOW, ABOUT BEGGARCHIEF.
BEGGARCHIEF IS A NOBODY AND HIS ACTIONS IS VERY INSIGNIFICANT TO THE SOCIETY, HE IS NOT CAPABLE ENOUGH TO INFLUENCE OR HAVE ANY IMPACT ON THE SOCIETY. HE CANT CONTRIBUTE ANYTHING TO THE SOCIETY. WITH HIM AROUND OR NOT, THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE.
HE IS JUST A DULL AND BORED INDIVIDUAL EXPRESSING HIS VIEWS, HIS HONEST VIEWS ON ISSUES.
ONE SHOULD NOT BE TOO SUPERFICIAL TO BELIEVE IN WHATEVER PEOPLE SAY IN THE CYBERSPACE.
ONE HAS TO LEARN TO IDENTIFY JOKES; ALLEGATION; OPINION; ADVICE ETC FROM THE FORUMITE'S POSTING. NEED TO READ IN BETWEEN LINES.
IF YOU ARE SMART ENOUGH, YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT BEGGAR'S VIEW IS RIGHT.
THERE ARE TOO MANY IGNORANCE, NAIVE AND ACT-SMART PEOPLE IN THIS FORUM.
TRY CONSULT OTHER ADULTS FOR THEIR OPINION.
BEGGARCHIEF
BEGGAR CUM CONMAN CUM FENGSHUI MASTER
P/S:
FORUMITES WHO LAUGH AT BEGGAR'S POSTINGS ARE PEOPLE WITH SENSE OF HUMOUR.
FORUMITES WHO THINK BEGGAR TALKED NONSENSE ARE PEOPLE WHO LACK IT.