I believe girls should not be educated
-
Look who's barking here?
A wise person would not get into an argument with a retard who argues for the sake of doing so.
This is important to enjoy the one-man barking show.
*** Takes Popcorns and Watch ***
-
This argument hasn't ended yet ?
-
Originally posted by parn:
Look who's barking here?
A wise person would not get into an argument with a retard who argues for the sake of doing so.
This is important to enjoy the one-man barking show.
*** Takes Popcorns and Watch ***
WOW your E-Popcorn is really frightening. hahaha
-
Who's going to be the "bigger" person and put an end to this childish argument ? . I'm sure most forumers are bored with you two already.
-
Originally posted by parn:
You.
Aren't you one of them who couldn't get over the 30k ring?
Too bad, I DENY you...please continue to harp on the 30k ring.
u sure? i won't even pay 1 dollar candy for you
-
Originally posted by HyperionDCZ:
parn is someone, who uses load after load of rubbish, to convince herself that she has some semblance of a brain.
she runs away from the challenge of anyone who's beyond her wit (which includes most people), and just bullshits to get herself out of the corners she runs into all the time.
doesn't understand simple words, and talks complete nonsense as a result.
sounds like someone who lacks intellect, who lacks any significant education, who thinks very highly of herself, who's very insecure, and thus very defensive. Interesting person. But useless.
so true..
-
Originally posted by HyperionDCZ:
parn is someone, who uses load after load of rubbish, to convince herself that she has some semblance of a brain.
she runs away from the challenge of anyone who's beyond her wit (which includes most people), and just bullshits to get herself out of the corners she runs into all the time.
doesn't understand simple words, and talks complete nonsense as a result.
sounds like someone who lacks intellect, who lacks any significant education, who thinks very highly of herself, who's very insecure, and thus very defensive. Interesting person. But useless.
This is a good one. Well said, good observation. plus one.
-
I don't believe these retards has ran out of steam already.
Certainly this is the suitable ending fit for retards who argued for the sake of doing it.
And that's why those guys were unable to become MEN....still unable to make it to be a MAN.
Need more encouragement?
-
Just stop it, you are making a bigger fool of yourself by continuing.
-
-
Lai chou chou re nao....
+ 1
+ 1
++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1
+ 1
+ 1
-
A bit crooked....dunno why.
-
Originally posted by rainee:
Just stop it, you are making a bigger fool of yourself by continuing.
I agree. -
I also want to have fun
+ 1
+ 1
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1
+ 1
+ 1
-
like this?
+ 1
+ 1
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1
+ 1
+ 1
-
Originally posted by Danielhuang88:
Alright fair enough. First things first, please do get the definitions "elite" and "good" school striaght. Only shallow people fail to make the distinction between a "good" school and "elite" school. So please, before you associate me with elitism, get your definitions straight.
You’re mistaken. No one inferred elitism with students from elite schools. Elitism in education is a topic that belongs to another thread for another day. Road sweepers may be elitists; graduates from elite schools may also qualify themselves for road sweeping. Elitism is a belief, an attitude ingrained in the social psyche through nasty experience. These beliefs direct your conduct in this society. No one is associating you with elitism here but since you insist, it helps to define it.
Elitism refer to situations in which an elite individual assumes special privileges and responsibilities in the hope that this arrangement will benefit humanity.Originally posted by Danielhuang88:About the conventional part, there is no basis for the comparison. In no part of my argument did i include conventional or radical societies. I merely included singapore being a conventional society so as to irritate a certain femenist being rather unfriendly in her posts.
Thanks for clarifying this. Like I said earlier, people who think that gender directly determines the value/worth of a person's potential in the workforce are incapable of negotiating beyond conventional ideas. These ideas are outdated and invalid in modern society.
In respond, you said that Singapore is a conventional society, then you went on about nudist beaches and sex with minors. What were you suggesting?
Originally posted by Danielhuang88:"It's sexist to assume that all indivuduals clearly fit into the category of male or female roles in our society - women have characteristics fit for home making, therefore they should be home makers"
-What is sexist about saying a gun is designed to kill, therefore you should use it instead of the stone as it is more effective.The principle here in mind is cigars are just cigars. Boys and girls, men and women are simply people. Rights, responsibilities and chances should not be affected by things like gender. A full-blown investigation into this is foolish.
Already there are extreme examples of such discrimination seen in existing societies, say India, China. Forumers have quoted decent examples, so I won’t discuss at length. These events should not be forgotten and must not be repeated. Pursuing equal chances for both genders is not about who has the bigger cigar. Not about who’s getting the cigar. It’s about making new cigars and embracing the process of lighting up.
Men have characteristics fit for combat, therefore all of them should serve NS is also a form of sexism. Simply because guns are designed to kill, therefore they MUST kill. If they don't kill, they are not living up to the sole purpose of their design and existence?
Imho, we have varied roles and these roles are ever changing, there is beauty in this change because it is fluid and it represents possibilities.
Originally posted by Danielhuang88:Now let us review, why is it that our dear femenists are so unhappy about being homemakers? Is it because they find that they do not get enough recognition, or is it because they get paid nothing ? If that is the case, perhaps they should be complaining to the government about it and not calling us "unevolved oppressive extremists" to sum up their, ah, case.
I like the new tone you are taking but it smells familiar to an old one you made.
You said, “Women and men will never be equal. But that doesnt mean one is superior and one is inferior. However if the situation does require women to go out and work then by all means. However now, the situation requires women to be home-makers that is all. And that is the gyst of why women should not require education.
There is nothing chauvinist about this, it is however fairly gender steorotypical.”
In other words, you are saying, that unless the situation requires women to go out and work, it should remain exclusively male? Please clarify, which situation. Our current situation? World situation? Singapore’s situation? Evolutionary situation? Your situation? For example, as long as the University of Bigotry have enough lecturers, female educators should be denied access to interviews and teaching positions, simply because they are not required?Originally posted by Danielhuang88:Now let us review, why is it that our dear femenists are so unhappy about being homemakers? Is it because they find that they do not get enough recognition, or is it because they get paid nothing ? If that is the case, perhaps they should be complaining to the government about it and not calling us "unevolved oppressive extremists" to sum up their, ah, case.
Don’t get lippy. You know this bit is irrelevant.
I’ll reserve the rest for another day.Later Danielhuang88.
-
i lazy to read all the pages but 30 pages in 3 days
-
Originally posted by jumpmanz:
i lazy to read all the pages but 30 pages in 3 days
30 pages of crap from a crap maker parn.
-
wa piang haven end ah...
-
Originally posted by jumpmanz:
i lazy to read all the pages but 30 pages in 3 days
I'll be very happy if we can catch up with CrapBox. -
Originally posted by parn:
I'll be very happy if we can catch up with CrapBox.parn you nid to go find a job and eat some bitter.
-
Originally posted by parn:
I'll be very happy if we can catch up with CrapBox.i'll be very happy if you were banned
-
Originally posted by Beaten_And_Damned:
i'll be very happy if you were banned
Me too, but I'll be very happy if you were beaten and damned then banned.At least you got banned with an irony.
-
Originally posted by parn:
Me too, but I'll be very happy if you were beaten and damned then banned.At least you got banned with an irony.
Beaten and damned is the clone of parn.
-
Originally posted by parn:
Me too, but I'll be very happy if you were beaten and damned then banned.At least you got banned with an irony.
I'd be very happy if you had your hands chopped and mouth removed.
At least we'd be spared of a crap spouter and a nuisance