-
-
Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Use P1.

TS don't know just anyhow write say he promote green PC and lower power consumption. all theories only. your monthly utilities bills tells all and the power efficiency depends greatly on your PSU also. most electronics product now are manufactured under the WEEE and rohs requirements so they are inevitably all going to go 'green'..TS just stating the obvious even if u want a product that is non-green u also cannot find anymore..unless u go for those made in countries or companies not ISO certified or not need to conform to the EU directives one.
headache mi now...thinking down to the level of a tood
-
-
-
Originally posted by hobochua:Can earn extra cash if managed to get hold of special pics of celebrities....
Part time reporter ........cool...
cannot leh even if i got celeb pics i also cannot post here leh latter can see the face ppl recognize hor will get sued 1

i show u all hor my travel photos lah take from different angle got upskirt and voyeuish one esp my trip to jap got see female ninja zg 1
can howlian here rite and anyhow suggest ppl ontour jobs mnc haha
oppss cannot anyhow write anymore 1 reply only got hit by ppl now gather my tail and hide in one corner

-
-
-
Originally posted by blazon:No one is an expert here.
But pipipopo claims to be one.
And he/she needs to win, else he will get cramps.
I'm only here because i promote "quieter and low-power consumption/green pc"

here here anyhow write anymore right? u here to promote crap and toodyness we all can see.
-
-
-
Originally posted by blazon:I mentioned clearly comparing only basic apps,
common sense to know that video encoding belong to processor
intensive tasks like video editing and gaming, and thus
more cpu mips will benefit.
Can't even read proper english or no common sense?
Which school are/were u from?toopid u tood common sense don't apply in the technical world of processors and u hav to know how they function and their basics in order to write some sense. video encoding to be more specific don't only depends on the processor it also depends on the pipelines. The P4 did better than the older AMDs because of the longer pipelines and virtual multicore. now with multiple physical cores the resources can be distributed evenly so that applications and instructions can be executed smooth and fast. for gaming ppl look for the graphics card because it plays the most important part in video rendering and gaming performances. better cpu means nothing if u hav not a good graphics card tood

Originally posted by blazon:Which part did i say u are an (loser) over-clocker ?
Can't read again? Or feel guilty?
Ur friends are rich? Rich doesn't mean they are not losers either.
Why mention rich friends? U have no confidence and need to bring
their "rich" status out?anyhow write now u tink i wrote that coz my feelings r hurt that u indirectly telling me i am a loser? my friends r so rich that they can afford to waste time gaming and overclocking. so what they are losers or they want to be losers? they can afford to
i hav so much confidence that i can write here
forever to prove that u r so tood as to start a thread techincally
that should belong to It tech forums yet u no confidence need to
post in chit chat
i anyhow
write also can beat u in theory. why r u hurt that i call u tood
that yr mama got fuk by bodoh and my friends all so rich and free
that they can afford to be losers but u can't? tood 
Originally posted by blazon:All P4 are based on the same core, differences only in cache and manufacturing
processes.
Do i need to explain in details how newer manufacturing process,
smaller transistors, lower voltage can can lower power consumption to some extend? (I doubt u can understand)
But the core itself is inefficient by Design.
Those in the CPU design community should know.
Don't understand English or technical aspects?
Reading web pages alone does not mean u know enough.
Prescott batch is one of the worst.
But its not just prescott, but others P4s too, esp the high-frequency ones.
Go find the MIPS-per-watt ratings.
Manufacturing processes can only help so much.what nonsense all P4 based on the same core? den why are there williamette and northwood and prescottcores in the P4 series? again u show ye tood tinking with that u wrote. who don't know lower voltage can lower power consumption but can it increase performance? ask my losers rich friends who overclocks
u don't need to explain more on the manufacturing
process coz the detials are never found anywhere u can access. how
big a mouth to go with yr mama's vaginal that the core itself is
inefficient what u in dsign community? anyhow say i in design can
tell u the core is efficient enough...but my bosses want to jack up
prices so sometimes we do things in ways ppl cannot comprehend u
tood
now say
prescott one of the worse so which of the high frequency ones are
bad also tell us leh tood? MIPS rating? i olny read my monthly
utilities bills and with what i am using my computer for and what i
can read off the power meter my P4 only consumes less that 100
watts per hour man even when i watch TV tood 
Originally posted by blazon:Only you yourself is having headache.
U must be just a kid. No one wishes to win.
You just showed so much of your character. Pathetic.
Not going to argue with u anymore, waste of my time here.i tink u r the kid yrself and u mama never giv u brains when she pop u out from her vaginal u can argue more but u can never beat me coz u r just a little boy who like to be a girl tood now when u lose anyhow write tood stuff here who u tryin to fool tood. not argue wif me arh so fast declare defeat come back leh i not done with u yet i got losts of time to watse ...u also come lah now holiday very free mah we all know tood
-
-
-
Originally posted by ceecookie:Also its pointless to compare clock speed for the 2 makers,as the AMD and Pentium/Core 2 artichitecture is totally different.
I go for Intel,AMD not good.go buy Intel esp if got sale and u find worth it. i will not disagree fully with u after all there's demand for the intel chips.
for mi i sit and wait. AMD's chips coming out in 2007 and vista's still not fully waxed.
all the hassle on multi-core is for the HD and 64-bit computing. only when these 2 are fully in swing then we will see how efficient the multi-cores are from the 2 processor giants and they core performances. its too early to tell now, too little charts and benchmarks to convince ppl.
all in all its too earlier in the battle to kill princes... -quote from Achilles (Troy)Edited by pipipopo 30 Nov `06, 12:51AM
-
-
-
Originally posted by aku1b0d0:nope. in this case, it consumes less power, if i'm not wrong.
the last line explains ALL.
i might not be a computer otaku, but i'm really interestd in computers and tech stuff.please don't embarrass yourself here lah bang.
u want to challenge yet what u wrote are only your 'presumed' victory and what u tink u r right about? what about the technical aspects? i will tell u the technical aspects of what makes the duo or multicore more superior over the P4s.
the architecture, the type of newer transistors used and the design of the processor layout with newer power efficient instructions and technology allows that. of not why would anyone pay for the R&D works with the processors in the lab and research department?
it won't consume a significant lesser power u will ever notice trust me. well at least if u compare it to the prescott u will.
if u r really interested in computers go read up and use them. why quote the obvious and pat your own back tinkin u hav paid tribute to your interest and its all well worth it? to ppl who knows more about stuff in this area it givs them headaches
-
-
-
Originally posted by aku1b0d0:it's not considered as flame if u can't win, loser.

dude, gather up some intelligence before talking.
"for the price u pay of course good lah." and u surrendered just after i flamed u a bit.

no lah for the price u pay its good and it also consumes more power when it has to do more work.
pay for the premium price of multicore upfront and pay for the higher electricity bills when the workload on the processor increases or stay happy with the stock processing power with normal applications. what's more to disagree with that? unless u have another make of multicore from the AMD like the older X2 cores to compare with.
when it comes to hardware bodoh u are not on par with me. i only want the TS tood ar s that's all.
buzz off
-
-
-
Originally posted by kawasaki2:What's wrong with Intel Pentium 4 processors? You talking about overheating or what?
P4 with HT technology still can use.
AMD speed indication is not clear, don't know what they mean by 3500+ or 2400+, Intel at least label clearer.
They offer a variety for users to choose. Not everyone needs a extremely powerful computer, right?TS just read one core type from the P4 series and pass jusdgement saying the P4 sux too much power that tood!
more specify TS should point to the core name and say that core of the P4 series sux. lik that those using good and sturdy cores from the other P4 series sure disagree 1.
as for the AMD series just do a search and goggle the core names are there just that ppl need to get use to the model and series naming for the AMD processors. for the 3500+ there are winchester and clawhammer core. one has a large L2 cache which the other consumes less power and rns cooler at stock
-
-
-
Originally posted by orionlight:Not really lah, the Northwood P4s are quite ok, in fact i still have one running fine after 4 years, no overheating issue.It's only the the prescotts, smithfields and preslers that are damn bloody hot and sucks power

that's why this thread is started by someone who ars s itchy for som spa nkin

-
-
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
Originally posted by Blazon:
The fact is, todays CPU power is more than enough for 90% of people.
Compare web-browsing, emailing, office apps, play dvd, mp3s
on a single core and dual core, or even an under-clocked single core,
u will not even notice the difference.
Besides many PCs in work places, do not do much more than the above tasks.
Unless u hardcore gamers and do profressional video editing.
As for over-clockers, they are losers with nothing better to do.
quote:
Originally posted by Blazon:
P4 is inefficient by design.
quote:
Originally posted by Blazon:
U think too much
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No all the computers i have worked with with my previous companies on LAN and local network lacks the processing power. oh gawd u must have worked with a few computers only in your pathethic life
i notice a lot of difference when i encode video on a single core as compared to a duo core man. don't bull here lah u never do more than just spresheet and word doc only anyhow write u bluff who? what hardcore gamer? i anyhow write u also believe u tood! what designer i design girls panties k need what? pentium 3 can oredi tood! overclockers? u overclock vefore? i got many rich friends nothing to do with plenty of time they OC so r they losers? yes but their fathers rich for them to lose what can u say? tood again!
P4 inefficient? only the prescott lah tood!
u real scary ccat never mind where u post i also can flame tood.
if ppl tink too much u tood must be one who never uses yr brain...why mama never born u brain arh tood?!
u giv everyone here a headache thinking down to your level tood!
Edited by pipipopo 29 Nov `06, 11:35PM
-
-
-
why would i buy a power saving CPU that can only perform light duties and cannot overclock to the fullest. tell that to the cpu extremists and overclockers or gamers who want a stable machine.
avoid P4..so many members in the P4 family which 1 u tokin about and what's a tpoic like this doing in chit chat? oh i see take this to IT tech forum scared kena flame...but no the flaming starts here and anywhere
noob
-
-
-
many lik to relate SMEs as family businesses but small and medium size enterprise usually sees the bosses hiring people they hav worked with before or whom they can trust. especially exe positions, sales, engineering and service, even quality assurance get to travel too. as for MNCs usually they have separate sales and service teams located at the various regional offices and in the areas affected the branch personnel there shall be triggered.
-
-
-
Originally posted by elindra:Ouch, I feel Don Don's claws

Anyway, like what most of the forumites have posted, you need to work in an International or Global Company.
Likely jobs are:
- Sales & Marketing - Especially if they have overseas customer database
- Business Development - For overseas market
- International Franchising
- Engineering posts which require you to go overseas for training
- Purchasing (Yes, a purchaser actually have pretty good chances of going overseas, then again it depends on the product you are dealing with)
u r wrong...that toopid guy who told u that prob knows nothing about what puke hes orgasming from his mouth...even SMEs local company that deals with suppliers or customers from overseas get a great deal of chance to travel too...now not only limited to undergrad posts...even ITE and diploma certified candidates hav available posts that requires u to travel too. chances are there so if u like the exposure go for it. when u had enough just pull out.
-
-
-
Originally posted by ditzy:You can take my job, if you're lucky, you get to go muar at least twice a week.

my job also very busy everyday travel here and there asia i travel all over also sian man when i meet my friends i can only tok about travel travel travel and i show them my travel photos and forever i tell ppl i very busy travel travel and when i lose an argument in forums and at kpoi tiam restaurant i say i am smarter coz i travel travel travel isee the whole so wen i see ppl i tink they r small

-
-
-
Originally posted by browniebaobao:sure?
there was once me and sis held on to the phone for 1 hour plus each.
so HOT that we demanded an explanation why nobody picked up the phone for that long. Then, they called me back everyday for about a week to make sure everything was fine.i think its the technical helpdesk side charging 30cents per min call to them. worse their 1610 free only for singtel residential line and singtel mobile...M1 and starhub lines calling in cannot.
-
