Signup
LoginRecent Posts by xian89
-
-
Hmm... to all MS Access pros n genius,
Can some1 tell me how shd I keep info in table for the below scenrio?
1 person in charge of many tasks
1 task can also be done by many people
I know i shd have 2 tables [Person] and [task]
in task table i shd have e.g
1. task id
2. task description
3. person ( which shd be link to [ person] table ba.....)
but liddat onli can sastify :
1 person --> many task , n not
1 task --> many person
how ar?
-
-
-
Originally posted by Tayysj:Use EDDIES to check on outstanding offences for other people's car.
https://www.psi.gov.sg/NASApp/tmf/TMFServlet?app=SPF-PTD-EDDIES-II&Reload=true
At the website above, click outstanding traffic offence then click check by locally registered vehicle number then key in the number and tada.
Edit: manually copy and paste the URL. apparently sgforums can't support https:// urls.No Outstanding Offences
-
-
-
Originally posted by tailslide:if the other party dun file a report on their side, ur insurance company would get the other party's insurance company to ask for the other party to file a report so that they can decide the liability percentage by comparing reports/ lawyers fight it out. in this case, if the other party dun cooperate by filing the report, the insurance companies lan lan just keep sending him reminder until he wanna settle lor -> waste time only. in this case, the only way to get him to settle is to initiate a civil summon to compel him to attend court, engage lawyers to fight the claim in court -> waste time, waste money.
Even if I want to initate a civil summon, w/o any of his detail, how m i suppose to do so?
meanwhile, if it was indeed his fault, he would have happy happy go repair his car out of his own pocket. no proof of accident to back up anyone's claim liao. nothing to affect his NCD or premiums.
Nope. He insist that it is my fault.
how bad was ur accident? IMO, under those circumstances, its 50/50 based upon ur version. likewise, insurance will likely settle at 50/50 liability if they find conflicting reports from both parties. in this case, both of u will lose ur NCD and ur premiums will both increase. could have well been a better option to settle on the spot and agree to repair ur own vehicles rather than lose the above.
As above, no injuries. Regarding 2nd part, nope i dun think he wan to settle on the spot. Brought alot ppl to boast his morale. Since he dun wan, why shd I compel.
i would have taken the photos, go to traffic police immediately, lodge a report against the guy for dangerous driving/ hit and run, send e-mail/see MP to compel immediate investigations citing that the guy has intention of repairing on his own to evade ownership of accident (since he would not have lodged a report). the police may or may not eventually act on the case but at least circumstantially, it is deemed that the other party is more culpable.
-
-
-
Originally posted by hisoka:but i think both sides supposed to fill in some forms with the particulars of the other person.
if that person dun give i wonder how would it be consideredI file his side of the report with his car plate no.
I ask for his NRIC no. , but he F** ly did not give any details.
-
-
-
Juz need opinion....
Scenrio: multi carpark with 1 direction
(A) If a vehicle at 1 side of the lane is coming to stationery position, can
another overtake it on the other side. Or muz the other have to wait
to see whether he will move.
(B) Even if the vehicle saw a empty parking lot, is it wrong to not look out for
approaching vehicle or even signal to warn other vehicles before parking.
(C) Can ppl ASSUME that since there is an empty parking slot, & their vehicle
is slowing down, it is clear that they want to park? By right, no matter
where u are, isn't it a rule to show ur intention to park?(the driver did
not show)
I have described the above to the ppl handling my case. They say chance will be 50%/50% coz both party has their wrongs. It depends whose story is more convincing.
-
