-
-
Sigh this is the reason I don’t SG military that frequently.
The quality of the posts are going downhill.
For the record on Ultimax 100, you can piece together the history from here.
http://www.thegunzone.com/556dw-6.html
Note: Mr Sullivan moved to Singapore to design the weapon due to US export restrictions.
-
-
-
Originally posted by Miracles&Prophecies:
Sorry I think AIM 54 never hit anything during war time.
Its hit rate was so poor that the only thing that it could reasonably hit were flight drones.
Also the F-14s have been banned from performing extremely low level flying (sea top flying) and the use of afterburner due to troubles in its engines.
snipI think your info on F-14 performance is out of date. Afterburner problems were resolved in the nineties? I can't remember the cause, need to check some books at home.
-
-
-
Originally posted by Scania L113 lover:
Say....is that a ghost in your avatar?
No fromhttp://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showpost.php?p=3075460&postcount=6
-
-
-
This info is from a paper put forward by a think tank. It is on why F-22 is not worth the money.
Quite old but worth a read. http://www.cdi.org/program/document.cfm?DocumentID=3389&from_page
The performance data on the chart will show you why F-18 is taking over the F-14. Not to mention the fact that the F-14 is a hangar queen, going at 1 maint hour per flying hour.
-
-
-
Originally posted by specialOps:They can disagree all they want, but I personally know people who were in the Bionix development team, and they spent several years developing it, and we also know the reason for its specific developments...its not a copied product, there was nothing to copy from in the first place.
Anyway...ST's factory is at Boon Lay, its not a secret...all the Bionix, SAR-21, Ultimax-100 SAW, bullets....Primus, FH-2000, mortar..wadever, all from there.It is 100% designed and made in Singapore....one of the best APCs in the world today...very proud of it.
I was referring to the last part about the best APCs in the world. IMHO it could have been designed better.
Whether did the folks ST copied the designs, I couldn't care less.
-
-
-
Originally posted by eagle:combat load for recce (my time was a few years ago only, not the load of 20 years ago)
Heaviest is the R2 load:
Field Pack:
7 standard field packs (with ET blade) (~4kg? Not sure)
1 * 940 signal set with battery (10kg)
1 * 940 signal set accessories (~1kg+)
1 * 940 battery (~1kg)
1 * 1.5 litre bottle (1.5kg)
SBO:
Standard with 2L water + 1 * smoke grenade
In war, will need to carry 3 additional magazines of rounds I think.
Food: 3 days ration
Weapon: Carbine (Now is SAR21)
Cannot remember if I have forgotten anything else...akan datang vests with inserts! what happened to frag grenade and ammo?
-
-
-
Originally posted by chino65:
We all know the M16 is not a perfect system.
But for all its supposed unreliability, the IDF have fought in the desert for 30 years with the M16.
(And here we have people in the US conducting laboratory tests to simulate desert combat? What a stupid waste taxpayers' money. Why not just ask the IDF "hey does the M16 work in the desert?)
There is the usual lame argument that the IDF used M16' cos they were FOC. But if the M16 didn't work in the desert, they wouldn't use it even if you pay them to.
But as it turns out, the IDF love the M16 / M4 and is a "weapon of choice".
...
IDF used expensive FN FALs in the 60's but they phased it out when they found it sensitive to the desert environment. [b]And yes, the FN FAL is a piston-drive.
So a piston-drive is not the magic bullet to reliability. [/b]The FN is 7.62mm and the then new standard is 5.56mm. No prizes for the reasons of change.
-
-
-
Originally posted by chino65:Here's an embarrassing incident with a training grenade.
The training grenade looks just like a real grenade. It is made of metal and has big holes in the body. Same as SFG87 it has safety clip, safety pin etc. After use the instructor will retrieve the metal body and put in another new blasting fuse. It is louder than a thunderflash.
I tossed the practice grenade around a corner in a comms trench into the bunker. As per SOP, I had my back turned away from the blast direction.
But the grenade had hit something and bounced back and rolled towards me. Since I had my back turned as per SOP I didn't know the thing rolled towards a few inches from my a.ss. Luckily, the instructors on top of the trench saw and yelled for me to scram.
I scammpered away just a milisecond before the grenade exploded. And luckily it was all just a drill.
So should a grenade be round or square?It should be round. The problem with the grenade rolling back is due to a SAF problem. The training areas are simply too clean. The rooms do not have enough debri to simulate real world.
-
-
-
Originally posted by specialOps:Advantage of the F/A-18D:
- Better low-speed manoeverability
- Better reliability (Two-engine + made-for-carrier engineering)
Disadvantege:
- Expensive
- Higher maintenance (two-engine + more expensive parts)
- Can't share technology and "special equipment" with a special ally.
Advantage of F-16:
- Much better agility.
- Technology and equipment sharing with a special ally
- Low cost
- Outwardly more defensive rather than offensive weapon (Less likely for political hoo-haa)
Disadvantage:
- Very slightly lower payload
- Shorter range
Overall ... F-16 still more worthwhile buy.You have no idea how wrong you are.
Try getting an F-16 to carry one of the following:
1. Harpoon
2. AMRAAM
3. AMRAAM + Harpoon
Pull 3G, lucky the wings are still there.
-
